Re: [PATCH v9 11/16] cxl/pci: Update __cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors

[Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>]

On 6/6/25 1:55 PM, Bowman, Terry wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/6/2025 3:30 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>
>> On 6/3/25 10:22 AM, Terry Bowman wrote:
>>> __cxl_handle_cor_ras() is missing logic to leave the function early in the
>>> case there is no RAS error. Update __cxl_handle_cor_ras() to exit early in
>>> the case there is no RAS errors detected after applying the mask.
>> This change is small enough that I would just fold it into the patch that introduces this function.
>>
>> DJ
> I agree. The problem is it was already present before this series. This is a 'fix'. I had this change in:
> [PATCH v9 09/16] cxl/pci: Log message if RAS registers are unmapped
> but was asked to move out because it appeared as an unrelated miscellaneous patch.

Ok. Then

Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>

> 
> Terry
>>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 9 +++++----
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>>> index 0f4c07fd64a5..f5f87c2c3fd5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>>> @@ -677,10 +677,11 @@ static void __cxl_handle_cor_ras(struct device *dev, u64 serial,
>>>  
>>>  	addr = ras_base + CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET;
>>>  	status = readl(addr);
>>> -	if (status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK) {
>>> -		writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>>> -		trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(dev, serial, status);
>>> -	}
>>> +	if (!(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK))
>>> +		return;
>>> +	writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>>> +
>>> +	trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(dev, serial, status);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void cxl_handle_endpoint_cor_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
>