Re: [PATCH v9 11/16] cxl/pci: Update __cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors

["Bowman, Terry" <terry.bowman@amd.com>]

On 6/12/2025 11:46 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 12:22:34 -0500
> Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> wrote:
> 
>> __cxl_handle_cor_ras() is missing logic to leave the function early in the
>> case there is no RAS error. Update __cxl_handle_cor_ras() to exit early in
>> the case there is no RAS errors detected after applying the mask.
> 
> I'm all for this as sensible cleanup, but the 'missing' kind
> of suggest a bug to me whereas I don't see one.
> Perhaps reword?
> 

Yes, I will reword the commit message.

-Terry

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 9 +++++----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> index 0f4c07fd64a5..f5f87c2c3fd5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> @@ -677,10 +677,11 @@ static void __cxl_handle_cor_ras(struct device *dev, u64 serial,
>>  
>>  	addr = ras_base + CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET;
>>  	status = readl(addr);
>> -	if (status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK) {
>> -		writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>> -		trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(dev, serial, status);
>> -	}
>> +	if (!(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK))
>> +		return;
>> +	writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>> +
>> +	trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(dev, serial, status);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void cxl_handle_endpoint_cor_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
>