From: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Min Li <min.li@microchip.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@intel.com>,
Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 07/10] dpll: reject measured_freq_get for foreign and on-pin registrations
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 13:24:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eea7b4ef-a514-4c2e-81c4-690cdeeb40c2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106121005.1327603-8-ivecera@redhat.com>
On 11/6/26 1:10 PM, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> A message about a pin with .measured_freq_get calls .freq_monitor_get of
> a dpll of the pin. For a pin of another domain, this device callback
> would run outside the domain of the dpll, so dpll_pin_register() now
> rejects such ops.
>
> dpll_pin_on_pin_register() checks nothing about them. The message would
> call .freq_monitor_get with no NULL check, on a dpll of the parent pin
> that can belong to another driver, so reject them there as well.
>
> No in-tree driver passes such ops. Add KUnit tests: the ops work on a dpll
> of the domain of the pin, and are rejected on a dpll of another domain and
> under a parent pin.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 6 +-
> drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> index 8eb74682343156..84377f8ba16036 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> @@ -958,7 +958,8 @@ dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>
> dev_ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
> if (WARN_ON(ops->measured_freq_get &&
> - (!dev_ops || !dev_ops->freq_monitor_get ||
> + (pin->domain != dpll->domain || !dev_ops ||
> + !dev_ops->freq_monitor_get ||
> !dev_ops->freq_monitor_set))) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out_unlock;
> @@ -1065,7 +1066,8 @@ int dpll_pin_on_pin_register(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>
> if (WARN_ON(!ops) ||
> WARN_ON(!ops->state_on_pin_get) ||
> - WARN_ON(!ops->direction_get))
> + WARN_ON(!ops->direction_get) ||
> + WARN_ON(ops->measured_freq_get))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> down_write(&dpll_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
> index a58800eda5ff51..84c405f855d8cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct dt_reg {
> struct dt_dev *dev;
> struct dt_pin *parent;
> struct dt_pin *notify;
> + const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops;
> struct dpll_domain *forbid;
> enum dpll_pin_state state;
> enum dpll_pin_direction direction;
> @@ -276,11 +277,33 @@ static int dt_lock_status_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int dt_freq_monitor_set(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
> + enum dpll_feature_state state,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dt_freq_monitor_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
> + enum dpll_feature_state *state,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct dt_dev *dev = priv;
> +
> + dt_dev_enter(dev, dpll);
> + *state = DPLL_FEATURE_STATE_ENABLE;
> + dt_leave(dev->dom);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct dpll_device_ops dt_dev_ops = {
> .mode_get = dt_mode_get,
> .mode_set = dt_mode_set,
> .supported_modes_get = dt_supported_modes_get,
> .lock_status_get = dt_lock_status_get,
> + .freq_monitor_set = dt_freq_monitor_set,
> + .freq_monitor_get = dt_freq_monitor_get,
> };
>
> static int dt_frequency_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
> @@ -433,6 +456,21 @@ static int dt_ref_sync_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int dt_measured_freq_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
> + const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
> + u64 *measured_freq,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct dt_reg *reg = pin_priv;
> +
> + dt_pin_enter(reg, pin);
> + atomic_inc(®->freq_gets);
> + *measured_freq = 1;
> + dt_leave(reg->dom);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops = {
> .frequency_get = dt_frequency_get,
> .state_on_dpll_get = dt_state_on_dpll_get,
> @@ -446,6 +484,13 @@ static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops = {
> .ref_sync_get = dt_ref_sync_get,
> };
>
> +static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops_measured = {
> + .measured_freq_get = dt_measured_freq_get,
> + .state_on_dpll_get = dt_state_on_dpll_get,
> + .state_on_pin_get = dt_state_on_pin_get,
> + .direction_get = dt_direction_get,
> +};
> +
> static const struct dpll_pin_properties dt_prop = {
> .type = DPLL_PIN_TYPE_EXT,
> .capabilities = DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_STATE_CAN_CHANGE |
> @@ -570,9 +615,9 @@ static void dt_reg_release(void *data)
>
> if (reg->parent)
> dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister(reg->parent->pin, reg->pin->pin,
> - &dt_pin_ops, reg);
> + reg->ops, reg);
> else
> - dpll_pin_unregister(reg->dev->dpll, reg->pin->pin, &dt_pin_ops,
> + dpll_pin_unregister(reg->dev->dpll, reg->pin->pin, reg->ops,
> reg);
> }
>
> @@ -588,12 +633,14 @@ static void dt_reg_add(struct kunit *test, struct dt_reg *reg,
> reg->parent = parent;
> reg->state = DPLL_PIN_STATE_SELECTABLE;
> reg->direction = DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_INPUT;
> + if (!reg->ops)
> + reg->ops = &dt_pin_ops;
>
> if (parent)
> - ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(parent->pin, pin->pin,
> - &dt_pin_ops, reg);
> + ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(parent->pin, pin->pin, reg->ops,
> + reg);
> else
> - ret = dpll_pin_register(dev->dpll, pin->pin, &dt_pin_ops, reg);
> + ret = dpll_pin_register(dev->dpll, pin->pin, reg->ops, reg);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, dt_reg_release,
> reg), 0);
> @@ -1432,6 +1479,59 @@ static void dt_test_ref_sync_pair(struct kunit *test)
> dt_expect_events(test, (void *[]){ ctx->p.pin }, 1);
> }
>
> +/* A pin with a measured frequency must be in the domain of its dpll */
> +static void dt_test_measured_freq_foreign(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w;
> + struct dt_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct dt_reg *reg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dt_dev_add(test, &ctx->e0, &ctx->dom_e, DT_CLOCK_ID_E, 0,
> + DPLL_TYPE_PPS);
> + dt_dev_add(test, &ctx->f0, &ctx->dom_f, DT_CLOCK_ID_F, 0,
> + DPLL_TYPE_PPS);
> + dt_fwnode_pin_add(test, &ctx->x, DT_CLOCK_ID_E, DT_PIN_IDX_X);
> +
> + reg = &ctx->reg_x_e0;
> + reg->ops = &dt_pin_ops_measured;
> + dt_reg_add(test, reg, &ctx->dom_e, &ctx->x, &ctx->e0, NULL);
> + atomic_set(®->freq_gets, 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dt_run(test, dt_pin_ntf, &ctx->x), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_GT(test, atomic_read(®->freq_gets), 0);
> +
> + w = kunit_start_suppress_warning(test);
> + ret = dpll_pin_register(ctx->f0.dpll, ctx->x.pin, reg->ops, reg);
> + kunit_end_suppress_warning(test, w);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EINVAL);
> + if (!ret)
> + dpll_pin_unregister(ctx->f0.dpll, ctx->x.pin, reg->ops, reg);
> +}
> +
> +/* A pin under a parent pin cannot have a measured frequency */
> +static void dt_test_measured_freq_on_pin(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w;
> + struct dt_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct dt_reg *reg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dt_on_pin_add(test);
> + dt_pin_add(test, &ctx->y, DT_CLOCK_ID_G, DT_PIN_IDX_Y, &dt_prop);
> + reg = &ctx->reg_c_m;
> +
> + w = kunit_start_suppress_warning(test);
> + ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(ctx->m.pin, ctx->y.pin,
> + &dt_pin_ops_measured, reg);
> + kunit_end_suppress_warning(test, w);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EINVAL);
> + if (!ret)
> + dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister(ctx->m.pin, ctx->y.pin,
> + &dt_pin_ops_measured, reg);
> +}
> +
> static struct kunit_case dt_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_domain_sharing),
> KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_domain_per_module),
> @@ -1456,6 +1556,8 @@ static struct kunit_case dt_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_set_on_pin),
> KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_device_set_ntf),
> KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_ref_sync_pair),
> + KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_measured_freq_foreign),
> + KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_measured_freq_on_pin),
> {}
> };
>
Reviewed-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 12:09 [PATCH net-next 00/10] dpll: do not serialize driver callbacks under global dpll_lock Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] ice: dpll: notify TSPLL lock status from the periodic work only Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:20 ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] ice: dpll: serialize changes of the SyncE CGU registers Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] dpll: add domain object Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:23 ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] dpll: take domain locks around driver callbacks Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:23 ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] dpll: convert dpll_lock to rwsem Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24 ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] dpll: add KUnit tests for core locking Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24 ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] dpll: reject measured_freq_get for foreign and on-pin registrations Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24 ` Petr Oros [this message]
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] dpll: zl3073x: update locking comments Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24 ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] ice: dpll: " Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] dpll: document locking rules Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:25 ` Petr Oros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eea7b4ef-a514-4c2e-81c4-690cdeeb40c2@redhat.com \
--to=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=grzegorz.nitka@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=karol.kolacinski@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=min.li@microchip.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®