mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Min Li <min.li@microchip.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@intel.com>,
	Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 07/10] dpll: reject measured_freq_get for foreign and on-pin registrations
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 13:24:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eea7b4ef-a514-4c2e-81c4-690cdeeb40c2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106121005.1327603-8-ivecera@redhat.com>



On 11/6/26 1:10 PM, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> A message about a pin with .measured_freq_get calls .freq_monitor_get of
> a dpll of the pin. For a pin of another domain, this device callback
> would run outside the domain of the dpll, so dpll_pin_register() now
> rejects such ops.
> 
> dpll_pin_on_pin_register() checks nothing about them. The message would
> call .freq_monitor_get with no NULL check, on a dpll of the parent pin
> that can belong to another driver, so reject them there as well.
> 
> No in-tree driver passes such ops. Add KUnit tests: the ops work on a dpll
> of the domain of the pin, and are rejected on a dpll of another domain and
> under a parent pin.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
> ---
>   drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c       |   6 +-
>   drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> index 8eb74682343156..84377f8ba16036 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> @@ -958,7 +958,8 @@ dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>   
>   	dev_ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
>   	if (WARN_ON(ops->measured_freq_get &&
> -		    (!dev_ops || !dev_ops->freq_monitor_get ||
> +		    (pin->domain != dpll->domain || !dev_ops ||
> +		     !dev_ops->freq_monitor_get ||
>   		     !dev_ops->freq_monitor_set))) {
>   		ret = -EINVAL;
>   		goto out_unlock;
> @@ -1065,7 +1066,8 @@ int dpll_pin_on_pin_register(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>   
>   	if (WARN_ON(!ops) ||
>   	    WARN_ON(!ops->state_on_pin_get) ||
> -	    WARN_ON(!ops->direction_get))
> +	    WARN_ON(!ops->direction_get) ||
> +	    WARN_ON(ops->measured_freq_get))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	down_write(&dpll_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
> index a58800eda5ff51..84c405f855d8cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct dt_reg {
>   	struct dt_dev *dev;
>   	struct dt_pin *parent;
>   	struct dt_pin *notify;
> +	const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops;
>   	struct dpll_domain *forbid;
>   	enum dpll_pin_state state;
>   	enum dpll_pin_direction direction;
> @@ -276,11 +277,33 @@ static int dt_lock_status_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int dt_freq_monitor_set(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
> +			       enum dpll_feature_state state,
> +			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dt_freq_monitor_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
> +			       enum dpll_feature_state *state,
> +			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	struct dt_dev *dev = priv;
> +
> +	dt_dev_enter(dev, dpll);
> +	*state = DPLL_FEATURE_STATE_ENABLE;
> +	dt_leave(dev->dom);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static const struct dpll_device_ops dt_dev_ops = {
>   	.mode_get = dt_mode_get,
>   	.mode_set = dt_mode_set,
>   	.supported_modes_get = dt_supported_modes_get,
>   	.lock_status_get = dt_lock_status_get,
> +	.freq_monitor_set = dt_freq_monitor_set,
> +	.freq_monitor_get = dt_freq_monitor_get,
>   };
>   
>   static int dt_frequency_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
> @@ -433,6 +456,21 @@ static int dt_ref_sync_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int dt_measured_freq_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
> +				const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
> +				u64 *measured_freq,
> +				struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	struct dt_reg *reg = pin_priv;
> +
> +	dt_pin_enter(reg, pin);
> +	atomic_inc(&reg->freq_gets);
> +	*measured_freq = 1;
> +	dt_leave(reg->dom);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops = {
>   	.frequency_get = dt_frequency_get,
>   	.state_on_dpll_get = dt_state_on_dpll_get,
> @@ -446,6 +484,13 @@ static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops = {
>   	.ref_sync_get = dt_ref_sync_get,
>   };
>   
> +static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops_measured = {
> +	.measured_freq_get = dt_measured_freq_get,
> +	.state_on_dpll_get = dt_state_on_dpll_get,
> +	.state_on_pin_get = dt_state_on_pin_get,
> +	.direction_get = dt_direction_get,
> +};
> +
>   static const struct dpll_pin_properties dt_prop = {
>   	.type = DPLL_PIN_TYPE_EXT,
>   	.capabilities = DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_STATE_CAN_CHANGE |
> @@ -570,9 +615,9 @@ static void dt_reg_release(void *data)
>   
>   	if (reg->parent)
>   		dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister(reg->parent->pin, reg->pin->pin,
> -					   &dt_pin_ops, reg);
> +					   reg->ops, reg);
>   	else
> -		dpll_pin_unregister(reg->dev->dpll, reg->pin->pin, &dt_pin_ops,
> +		dpll_pin_unregister(reg->dev->dpll, reg->pin->pin, reg->ops,
>   				    reg);
>   }
>   
> @@ -588,12 +633,14 @@ static void dt_reg_add(struct kunit *test, struct dt_reg *reg,
>   	reg->parent = parent;
>   	reg->state = DPLL_PIN_STATE_SELECTABLE;
>   	reg->direction = DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_INPUT;
> +	if (!reg->ops)
> +		reg->ops = &dt_pin_ops;
>   
>   	if (parent)
> -		ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(parent->pin, pin->pin,
> -					       &dt_pin_ops, reg);
> +		ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(parent->pin, pin->pin, reg->ops,
> +					       reg);
>   	else
> -		ret = dpll_pin_register(dev->dpll, pin->pin, &dt_pin_ops, reg);
> +		ret = dpll_pin_register(dev->dpll, pin->pin, reg->ops, reg);
>   	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>   	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, dt_reg_release,
>   							reg), 0);
> @@ -1432,6 +1479,59 @@ static void dt_test_ref_sync_pair(struct kunit *test)
>   	dt_expect_events(test, (void *[]){ ctx->p.pin }, 1);
>   }
>   
> +/* A pin with a measured frequency must be in the domain of its dpll */
> +static void dt_test_measured_freq_foreign(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w;
> +	struct dt_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct dt_reg *reg;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dt_dev_add(test, &ctx->e0, &ctx->dom_e, DT_CLOCK_ID_E, 0,
> +		   DPLL_TYPE_PPS);
> +	dt_dev_add(test, &ctx->f0, &ctx->dom_f, DT_CLOCK_ID_F, 0,
> +		   DPLL_TYPE_PPS);
> +	dt_fwnode_pin_add(test, &ctx->x, DT_CLOCK_ID_E, DT_PIN_IDX_X);
> +
> +	reg = &ctx->reg_x_e0;
> +	reg->ops = &dt_pin_ops_measured;
> +	dt_reg_add(test, reg, &ctx->dom_e, &ctx->x, &ctx->e0, NULL);
> +	atomic_set(&reg->freq_gets, 0);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dt_run(test, dt_pin_ntf, &ctx->x), 0);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_GT(test, atomic_read(&reg->freq_gets), 0);
> +
> +	w = kunit_start_suppress_warning(test);
> +	ret = dpll_pin_register(ctx->f0.dpll, ctx->x.pin, reg->ops, reg);
> +	kunit_end_suppress_warning(test, w);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EINVAL);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		dpll_pin_unregister(ctx->f0.dpll, ctx->x.pin, reg->ops, reg);
> +}
> +
> +/* A pin under a parent pin cannot have a measured frequency */
> +static void dt_test_measured_freq_on_pin(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w;
> +	struct dt_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct dt_reg *reg;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dt_on_pin_add(test);
> +	dt_pin_add(test, &ctx->y, DT_CLOCK_ID_G, DT_PIN_IDX_Y, &dt_prop);
> +	reg = &ctx->reg_c_m;
> +
> +	w = kunit_start_suppress_warning(test);
> +	ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(ctx->m.pin, ctx->y.pin,
> +				       &dt_pin_ops_measured, reg);
> +	kunit_end_suppress_warning(test, w);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EINVAL);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister(ctx->m.pin, ctx->y.pin,
> +					   &dt_pin_ops_measured, reg);
> +}
> +
>   static struct kunit_case dt_cases[] = {
>   	KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_domain_sharing),
>   	KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_domain_per_module),
> @@ -1456,6 +1556,8 @@ static struct kunit_case dt_cases[] = {
>   	KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_set_on_pin),
>   	KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_device_set_ntf),
>   	KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_ref_sync_pair),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_measured_freq_foreign),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_measured_freq_on_pin),
>   	{}
>   };
>   
Reviewed-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06 12:09 [PATCH net-next 00/10] dpll: do not serialize driver callbacks under global dpll_lock Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] ice: dpll: notify TSPLL lock status from the periodic work only Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:20   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] ice: dpll: serialize changes of the SyncE CGU registers Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] dpll: add domain object Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:23   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] dpll: take domain locks around driver callbacks Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:23   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] dpll: convert dpll_lock to rwsem Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] dpll: add KUnit tests for core locking Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] dpll: reject measured_freq_get for foreign and on-pin registrations Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24   ` Petr Oros [this message]
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] dpll: zl3073x: update locking comments Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] ice: dpll: " Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] dpll: document locking rules Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:25   ` Petr Oros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eea7b4ef-a514-4c2e-81c4-690cdeeb40c2@redhat.com \
    --to=poros@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=grzegorz.nitka@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=karol.kolacinski@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=min.li@microchip.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®