mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Min Li <min.li@microchip.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@intel.com>,
	Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] dpll: document locking rules
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 13:25:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f73146cb-fcbb-4263-90d9-b5378faf30f7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106121005.1327603-11-ivecera@redhat.com>



On 11/6/26 1:10 PM, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Describe the lock levels of the subsystem, which domain a callback runs
> under and the rules device drivers have to follow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c          |  9 +++++++
>   2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> index 7c117ae37cc1bc..40d5037ff3bb0f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> @@ -675,6 +675,50 @@ In the error path we have to rewind every allocation in the reverse order:
>   
>   More complex example can be found in Intel's ICE driver or nVidia's mlx5 driver.
>   
> +Locking
> +=======
> +
> +The subsystem uses two levels of locks, always taken in this order:
> +
> +- ``dpll_lock`` protects the topology of dpll devices and pins and their
> +  lifetime. Functions changing the topology, for example dpll_pin_register(),
> +  take it for write and send the create and delete notifications under it.
> +  Netlink requests, each part of a dump and change notifications take it for
> +  read for their whole duration.
> +- A domain lock serializes driver callbacks. All dpll devices and pins created
> +  with the same module and ``clock_id`` belong to one domain, in practice to
> +  one chip or card.
> +
> +A netlink request addressing a device or a pin by its ID holds the domain lock
> +of that object from start to end. A notification holds it while its message is
> +built and sent, so messages of one object are sent in the order they were
> +built. Only one domain lock is held at a time, so domains have no lock order,
> +and callbacks of different domains can run concurrently.
> +
> +Callbacks of a dpll device run under the domain of the device. Callbacks of a
> +pin run under the domain of the pin, whichever driver registered them:
> +
> +- A driver registering a pin of another driver with its dpll device has these
> +  callbacks serialized with the driver that created the pin, not with the other
> +  callbacks of its device, so it has to protect the state they share by itself.
> +  A callback stuck in such a registration stops the domain of the pin.
> +- The parent pin of a pin registered with dpll_pin_on_pin_register() and its
> +  dpll devices can belong to another driver, so the callback must not
> +  dereference their private data.
> +- The frequency monitor belongs to the dpll device, so only callbacks of a pin
> +  of the same domain registered with dpll_pin_register() can include
> +  ``.measured_freq_get``.
> +
> +Device drivers have to follow these rules:
> +
> +- A callback must not call dpll_device_change_ntf(), dpll_pin_change_ntf() or
> +  any function changing the topology.
> +- A callback notifies about objects of the domain it runs under with
> +  __dpll_device_change_ntf() or __dpll_pin_change_ntf(). Other objects have to
> +  be notified from a context that holds no domain lock, for example a work item.
> +- A driver must not call dpll_device_change_ntf(), dpll_pin_change_ntf() or any
> +  function changing the topology while holding a lock that its callbacks take.
> +
>   SyncE enablement
>   ================
>   For SyncE enablement it is required to allow control over dpll device
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> index 84377f8ba16036..6ad40fb9eee855 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> @@ -932,6 +932,10 @@ __dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>    * @ops: ops for a dpll pin ops
>    * @priv: pointer to private information of owner
>    *
> + * The callbacks run under the domain of @pin. If @pin belongs to another domain
> + * than @dpll, they are not serialized with the callbacks of @dpll and @ops must
> + * not include .measured_freq_get.
> + *
>    * Context: Acquires dpll_lock and domain locks
>    * Return:
>    * * 0 on success
> @@ -1049,6 +1053,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_unregister);
>    * Register a pin with a parent pin, create references between them and
>    * between newly registered pin and dplls connected with a parent pin.
>    *
> + * The callbacks run under the domain of @pin. The parent pin and its dplls can
> + * belong to another driver, so @ops must not dereference their private data.
> + * The frequency monitor belongs to a dpll, so @ops must not include
> + * .measured_freq_get.
> + *
>    * Context: Acquires dpll_lock and domain locks
>    * Return:
>    * * 0 on success
Reviewed-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06 12:09 [PATCH net-next 00/10] dpll: do not serialize driver callbacks under global dpll_lock Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] ice: dpll: notify TSPLL lock status from the periodic work only Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:20   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] ice: dpll: serialize changes of the SyncE CGU registers Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] dpll: add domain object Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:23   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] dpll: take domain locks around driver callbacks Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:23   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] dpll: convert dpll_lock to rwsem Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] dpll: add KUnit tests for core locking Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] dpll: reject measured_freq_get for foreign and on-pin registrations Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] dpll: zl3073x: update locking comments Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:24   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] ice: dpll: " Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 15:31   ` Petr Oros
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] dpll: document locking rules Ivan Vecera
2026-11-10 12:25   ` Petr Oros [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f73146cb-fcbb-4263-90d9-b5378faf30f7@redhat.com \
    --to=poros@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=grzegorz.nitka@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=karol.kolacinski@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=min.li@microchip.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®