From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ricardo.neri@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] sched/fair: Allow load balancing between CPUs of identical capacity
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:45:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5097855-ee3c-49a9-82d6-93477e87534d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtBpRgQdH6=3uCL02+K1Y=HpbJoP0j8eo0HHPv8EhLQxXQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/23/26 08:20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 at 01:55, Ricardo Neri
> <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> sched_balance_find_src_rq() avoids selecting a runqueue with a single
>> running task as busiest if doing so results in migrating the task to a
>> CPU with less than ~5% of extra capacity. It also unintentionally
>> prevents migrations between CPUs of identical capacity.
>>
>> When CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is enabled, load should be balanced across
>> clusters of CPUs with the same capacity. Allowing migration between CPUs
>> of identical capacity is necessary to meet this goal.
>>
>> Use arch_scale_cpu_capacity() to reflect architectural capacity, excluding
>
> capacity_of() reflects not only RT and irq pressure but also thermal
> pressure or system frequency capping.
> If dst cluster is under thermal mitigation but the source cluster is
> not, we probably shouldn't spread tasks across both clusters.
> Have you considered using get_actual_cpu_capacity() instead of
> arch_scale_cpu_capacity() ?
Replacing arch_scale_cpu_capacity() with get_actual_cpu_capacity()
would make the == comparison below very unlikely to be true FWIW.
I think it's fine like that, I will prepare a follow-up anyway to make
it work for our "almost equal capacity" cluster systems and then also
consider switching to get_actual_cpu_capacity() since we include a margin
anyway.
>
>> runtime reductions due to side activity or thermal pressure. Guard this
>> check with the sched_cluster_active static key so that systems without
>> cluster topology are unaffected.
>>
>> Tested-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v5:
>> * Optimized logic to identify same-arch clusters only when needed.
>> * Added Tested-by tag from Christian. Thanks!
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> * Implemented the check for cluster with a local variable for improved
>> readability.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> * Reverted the inverted capacity check; the inverted form incorrectly
>> allows migrations to CPUs of slightly less capacity.
>> * Guarded the check for architectural capacity with the
>> sched_cluster_active static key.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> * Used arch_scale_cpu_capacity() instead of capacity_of() to ignore
>> runtime variability.
>> * Inverted the check for runtime capacity. (Christian)
>> * Reworded patch description for clarity.
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index e55eb019d2c9..f4eb55cad54d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -12992,13 +12992,20 @@ static struct rq *sched_balance_find_src_rq(struct lb_env *env,
>> */
>> if (env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY &&
>> nr_running == 1) {
>> + bool same_arch_cluster = static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cluster_active) &&
>> + (arch_scale_cpu_capacity(env->dst_cpu) ==
>> + arch_scale_cpu_capacity(i));
>> bool smt_degraded_cap = sched_smt_active() && !is_core_idle(i);
>>
>> /*
>> * Busy SMT siblings reduce the capacity of CPU @i. Do
>> * not skip it in this case.
>> + *
>> + * CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER requires balancing load across clusters
>> + * of identical capacity. Use architectural capacity to ignore
>> + * runtime variability.
>> */
>> - if (!smt_degraded_cap &&
>> + if (!smt_degraded_cap && !same_arch_cluster &&
>> !capacity_greater(capacity_of(env->dst_cpu), capacity))
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 0:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] sched: Fix cluster scheduling in the presence of asymmetric capacity Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 0:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] sched/fair: Do not skip CPUs of similar capacity with busy SMT siblings Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 7:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-24 5:25 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 0:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] sched/fair: Also gate overloaded status update for SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 7:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-23 0:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] sched/fair: Check CPU capacity before comparing group types during load balance Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 0:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] sched/fair: Skip misfit load accounting when the destination CPU cannot help Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 0:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] sched/fair: Allow load balancing between CPUs of identical capacity Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 7:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-23 7:45 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2026-06-24 5:25 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-06-26 0:11 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-06-26 14:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-27 2:02 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-06-29 15:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-29 15:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-06-29 15:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-29 16:32 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-06-30 7:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-26 15:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-27 19:07 ` Andrea Righi
2026-06-29 16:22 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 0:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] sched/topology: Do not clear SD_PREFER_SIBLING in domains with clusters Ricardo Neri
2026-06-23 7:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-24 5:14 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-06-26 0:19 ` Ricardo Neri
2026-06-26 14:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-29 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] sched: Fix cluster scheduling in the presence of asymmetric capacity Andrea Righi
2026-06-29 16:24 ` Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5097855-ee3c-49a9-82d6-93477e87534d@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®