From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, david.quigley@intel.com,
lukas@wunner.de, ksinyuk@kernel.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
cedric.xing@intel.com, sameo@meta.com, drdeeglaze@gmail.com,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, aik@amd.com,
jpiotrowski@nvidia.com, qinkun@google.com, pgonda@google.com,
jic23@kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, ankita@nvidia.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kas@kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, peter.fang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/20] attestation: Add a common subsystem and TDX support
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:34:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5av76sj10a.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atooh7uO2RauUTfY@FV6GYCPJ69>
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> writes:
> Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 12:30:47PM +0200, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org wrote:
>>Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> writes:
>>
>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>>>
[ ... 67 lines skipped ... ]
>>>
>>
>>I am using this to understand what the IDE setup flow would look like,
>>but it is unclear whether the connect flow belongs in an attestation
>>framework. I understand the desire to pass the certificate slot number
>>as part of connect, and sysfs is probably not a suitable interface for
>>that. However, is CTLV the interface we want to use for connect?
>
> I was thinking about this and "connect" really does not belong in the
> attestation CTLV (same applies to "lock"). I was thinking about some
> parallel PCITSM CTLV instance, but that does not really click as well.
>
> Currently I'm thinking we can maintain existing "connect" in sysfs and
> extend it with "lock" sysfs knob for Realm side. Both would create
> ctlv-attestation-spdm instance. The same spdm instance may be created
> for other non-PCI-backed device.
>
> The proposed host flow is:
>
> sysfs connect: select tsmN and prepare the connection
> -> negotiate SPDM and discover certificates
> -> register ctlv-attestation-spdm instance in DISCOVERED state
>
> SPDM_GET
> -> populated certificate slots and digests
>
> EVIDENCE_GET(CERT_CHAIN, blob-instance=slot) /*optional*/
> -> retrieve candidate certificate chain for appraisal
>
> SPDM_AUTHENTICATE(device-generation, spdm-slot=selected_slot)
> -> authenticate the selected chain
> -> complete backend-required session and IDE setup
>
> sysfs disconnect
> -> remove the attestation instance
> -> destroy the native connection
>
> The slot is therefore selected after discovery, rather than supplied to
> connect. The attestation instance represents the prepared connection; it
> does not exist beforehand as a controller for a disconnected PCI function.
>
CCA currently takes the device identity index during pdev_create. I am
investigating how to retrieve the certificate chains for all slots. For
now, I have implemented the sequence below.
echo tsm0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/$DEVICE/tsm/connect
./ctlvctl/ctlvctl --spec-dir=./specs/ exec ctlv0 device-get
# device-get, 1 fragment, generation 0
device.generation 0
device.caps
cap.evidence
cap.min-challenge-length 0
cap.max-challenge-length 0
cap.max-total-output-length 369098752
cap.evidence-flags evidence-accept
cap.object
cap.blob-class cert-chain
cap.blob-instance 0
cap.format spdm-cert-chain
cap.representation raw
cap.representation tcb-digest
cap.hash-algo 4
cap.hash-algo 5
cap.hash-algo 6
cap.max-length 16777216
device.info
pci.name 0000:02:00.0
I think we can use evidence-refresh to select the blob-instance for the
desired slot once the CCA specification supports that.
./ctlvctl/ctlvctl --spec-dir=./specs/ exec ctlv0 state-get
# state-get, 1 fragment, generation 0
pci.generation 0
pci.connected 1
pci.locked 0
pci.accepted 0
pci.tsm-id 0
pci.dsm 0000:02:00.0
device is marked connected, but IDE is not setup as indicated by pci.accepted = 0
./ctlvctl/ctlvctl --spec-dir=./specs/ exec ctlv0 evidence-get --json '{
"evidence.challenge": "hex:", "evidence.object": [{
"evidence.blob-class": "cert-chain", "evidence.format":
"spdm-cert-chain", "evidence.blob-instance": 0,
"evidence.representation": "raw", "evidence.data": { "file":
"/tmp/cert0.bin", "data-buf-size": 16777216 } }] }'
# evidence-get, 1 fragment, generation 0
device.generation 0
evidence.generation 1
evidence.object-length 1632
I added the file: attribute to verify the evidence blob's contents. ie,
we can do:
# file cert0.bin
cert0.bin: Certificate, Version=3
./ctlvctl/ctlvctl --spec-dir=./specs/ exec ctlv0 evidence-accept device.generation=0 evidence.generation=1
# acknowledged
./ctlvctl/ctlvctl --spec-dir=./specs/ exec ctlv0 state-get
# state-get, 1 fragment, generation 0
pci.generation 0
pci.connected 1
pci.locked 0
pci.accepted 1
pci.tsm-id 0
pci.dsm 0000:02:00.0
I am wondering why we need 'devsec-run' ops. Isn't that already the result of
'evidence-accept'?
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 14:50 Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 01/20] ctlv: Add the schema language and generator Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 22:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-21 13:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 02/20] ctlv: Add the UAPI wire format and family API Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 12:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 23:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-20 23:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-21 13:54 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 03/20] ctlv: Add the root family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 12:28 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 12:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 14:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 23:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-21 16:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 04/20] Documentation: ctlv: Add userspace ABI Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 14:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 0:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-22 9:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 05/20] ctlv: Prepare message input handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 0:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-22 8:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 18:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 12:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 06/20] ctlv: Prepare blob descriptor validation Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 07/20] ctlv: Prepare schema validation Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 08/20] ctlv: Prepare message output handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 09/20] ctlv: Prepare VA blob handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 10/20] ctlv: Prepare event queue support Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 1:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-22 9:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 11/20] ctlv: Prepare runtime introspection Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 12/20] ctlv: Add device and operation dispatch Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 1:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-22 9:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 18:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 12:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 13/20] Documentation: ctlv: Describe how to write a family Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 14:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 14:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 16:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 8:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 19:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 13:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 14/20] attestation: Add the base family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 15/20] attestation: Prepare provider and instance core Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 13:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 16/20] attestation: Prepare measurement register journal Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 17/20] attestation: Add CTLV operation handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 18/20] tdx-guest: Expose the native attestation service API Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 19/20] attestation: Add the TDX family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 20/20] attestation: Add the TDX family implementation Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 22:07 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-10-16 23:43 ` [PATCH RFC 00/20] attestation: Add a common subsystem and TDX support Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-17 18:16 ` Dionna Glaze
2026-10-17 19:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 19:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 19:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 20:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-17 21:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 20:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-17 20:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 23:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-18 23:53 ` Dionna Glaze
2026-10-19 12:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 16:10 ` Dionna Glaze
2026-10-19 22:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 8:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 14:12 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-21 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 19:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-22 10:54 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 11:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-22 18:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 19:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-22 19:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 19:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-22 19:40 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-22 12:26 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-22 13:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 14:07 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-22 19:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 19:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-22 19:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 19:52 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-22 20:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-20 9:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 13:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-20 14:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 15:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-20 16:11 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-20 16:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 12:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-21 13:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-21 13:50 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-21 13:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 14:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-21 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 12:48 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-21 13:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-19 12:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-19 23:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 12:49 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-20 13:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 10:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-22 15:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 16:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 8:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-10-23 11:32 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq5av76sj10a.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.quigley@intel.com \
--cc=drdeeglaze@gmail.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jpiotrowski@nvidia.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=ksinyuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=peter.fang@intel.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=qinkun@google.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sameo@meta.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®