From: Kuyo Chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
jstultz <jstultz@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/deadline: Fix RT task potential starvation when expiry time passed
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 22:20:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <089882f95b1b910f7feecddd0ad9b17f38394c64.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFAyN4rfssKmbUE5@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
On Mon, 2025-06-16 at 17:03 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> >
> > [Proposed Solution]:
> > ------------------
> > Instead of immediately re-enqueuing the DL entity on timer
> > registration
> > failure, this change ensures the DL entity is properly replenished
> > and
> > the timer is restarted, preventing RT potential starvation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index ad45a8fea245..e50cb76c961b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > @@ -1556,10 +1556,12 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq
> > *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
> > }
> >
> > if (unlikely(is_dl_boosted(dl_se) ||
> > !start_dl_timer(dl_se))) {
> > - if (dl_server(dl_se))
> > - enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se,
> > ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
> > - else
> > + if (dl_server(dl_se)) {
> > + replenish_dl_new_period(dl_se, rq);
> > + start_dl_timer(dl_se);
>
> But, even today, enqueue_dl_entity() is called with ENQUEUE_REPLENISH
> flag, so I don't get why you say 're-enqueues the DL entity without
> properly replenishing'.
>
> Also, why restarting the replenishing timer right after having
> replenished the entity?
>
When dl_defer_running = 1 and the running time has been exhausted,
it means that the dl_server should stop at this point.
However, if start_dl_timer() returns a failure, it indicates that the
actual time spent consuming the running time was unexpectedly long.
At this point, there are two options:
[as-is] 1. re-enqueuing the dl entity with ENQUEUE_REPLENISH will clear
the throttled flag
and re-enqueue the dl entity to keep the fair_server running.
enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
=> replenish_dl_entity
=> replenish_dl_new_period(dl_se, rq);
=> dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
=> dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
=> __enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se);
[to-be] 2. To avoid RT latency, the fair_server should remain throttled
while replenishing the dl_se.
Once replenishing is complete, we can ensure that a timer is
successfully started.
When the timer is triggered, the throttled state will be cleared,
ensuring that RT tasks can execute during this interval.
It is a policy decision for dealing with the case of failure in
start_dl_timer().
The second approach is better for real-time (RT) latency in my opinion,
as RT tasks must be prioritized.
> Thanks,
> Juri
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-18 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-15 13:10 Kuyo Chang
2025-06-16 15:03 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-18 14:20 ` Kuyo Chang [this message]
2025-06-19 13:13 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20 3:00 ` Kuyo Chang
2025-06-20 15:22 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-21 2:55 ` Kuyo Chang
2025-07-23 22:22 ` Pierce Wen (溫彥翔)
2025-07-24 8:23 ` juri.lelli
2025-07-30 10:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-07-31 15:00 ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-15 4:35 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-08-20 12:57 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-08-27 6:45 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for kuyo chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=089882f95b1b910f7feecddd0ad9b17f38394c64.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®