From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Kuyo Chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
jstultz <jstultz@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/deadline: Fix RT task potential starvation when expiry time passed
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:00:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2990c9d8-c957-4443-a2c5-4b62e48dc818@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWZHwr_nmMbVREKC9nQCYigT_gvKH3M9v+oyYqk6FLONw@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/30/25 11:06, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Kuyo,
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 at 14:39, Kuyo Chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>> From: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
>>
>> [Symptom]
>> The fair server mechanism, which is intended to prevent fair starvation
>> when higher-priority tasks monopolize the CPU.
>> Specifically, RT tasks on the runqueue may not be scheduled as expected.
>>
>> [Analysis]
>> ---------
>> The log "sched: DL replenish lagged too much" triggered.
>>
>> By memory dump of dl_server:
>> --------------
>> curr = 0xFFFFFF80D6A0AC00 (
>> dl_server = 0xFFFFFF83CD5B1470(
>> dl_runtime = 0x02FAF080,
>> dl_deadline = 0x3B9ACA00,
>> dl_period = 0x3B9ACA00,
>> dl_bw = 0xCCCC,
>> dl_density = 0xCCCC,
>> runtime = 0x02FAF080,
>> deadline = 0x0000082031EB0E80,
>> flags = 0x0,
>> dl_throttled = 0x0,
>> dl_yielded = 0x0,
>> dl_non_contending = 0x0,
>> dl_overrun = 0x0,
>> dl_server = 0x1,
>> dl_server_active = 0x1,
>> dl_defer = 0x1,
>> dl_defer_armed = 0x0,
>> dl_defer_running = 0x1,
>> dl_timer = (
>> node = (
>> expires = 0x000008199756E700),
>> _softexpires = 0x000008199756E700,
>> function = 0xFFFFFFDB9AF44D30 = dl_task_timer,
>> base = 0xFFFFFF83CD5A12C0,
>> state = 0x0,
>> is_rel = 0x0,
>> is_soft = 0x0,
>> clock_update_flags = 0x4,
>> clock = 0x000008204A496900,
>>
>> - The timer expiration time (rq->curr->dl_server->dl_timer->expires)
>> is already in the past, indicating the timer has expired.
>> - The timer state (rq->curr->dl_server->dl_timer->state) is 0.
>>
>> [Suspected Root Cause]
>> --------------------
>> The relevant code flow in the throttle path of
>> update_curr_dl_se() as follows:
>>
>> dequeue_dl_entity(dl_se, 0); // the DL entity is dequeued
>>
>> if (unlikely(is_dl_boosted(dl_se) || !start_dl_timer(dl_se))) {
>> if (dl_server(dl_se)) // timer registration fails
>> enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);//enqueue immediately
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> The failure of `start_dl_timer` is caused by attempting to register a
>> timer with an expiration time that is already in the past. When this
>> situation persists, the code repeatedly re-enqueues the DL entity
>> without properly replenishing or restarting the timer, resulting in RT
>> task may not be scheduled as expected.
>>
>> [Proposed Solution]:
>> ------------------
>> Instead of immediately re-enqueuing the DL entity on timer registration
>> failure, this change ensures the DL entity is properly replenished and
>> the timer is restarted, preventing RT potential starvation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
>
> Thanks, this fixes the issue I was seeing!
>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
FWIW the reported issue is also present on an arm64 rk3399 and
$SUBJECT fixes that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-31 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-15 13:10 Kuyo Chang
2025-06-16 15:03 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-18 14:20 ` Kuyo Chang
2025-06-19 13:13 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20 3:00 ` Kuyo Chang
2025-06-20 15:22 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-21 2:55 ` Kuyo Chang
2025-07-23 22:22 ` Pierce Wen (溫彥翔)
2025-07-24 8:23 ` juri.lelli
2025-07-30 10:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-07-31 15:00 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2025-08-15 4:35 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-08-20 12:57 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-08-27 6:45 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for kuyo chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2990c9d8-c957-4443-a2c5-4b62e48dc818@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®