mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuyo Chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: jstultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/deadline: Fix RT task potential starvation when expiry time passed
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:10:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250615131129.954975-1-kuyo.chang@mediatek.com> (raw)

From: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>

[Symptom]
The fair server mechanism, which is intended to prevent fair starvation
when higher-priority tasks monopolize the CPU.
Specifically, RT tasks on the runqueue may not be scheduled as expected.

[Analysis]
---------
The log "sched: DL replenish lagged too much" triggered.

By memory dump of dl_server:
--------------
    curr = 0xFFFFFF80D6A0AC00 (
      dl_server = 0xFFFFFF83CD5B1470(
        dl_runtime = 0x02FAF080,
        dl_deadline = 0x3B9ACA00,
        dl_period = 0x3B9ACA00,
        dl_bw = 0xCCCC,
        dl_density = 0xCCCC,
        runtime = 0x02FAF080,
        deadline = 0x0000082031EB0E80,
        flags = 0x0,
        dl_throttled = 0x0,
        dl_yielded = 0x0,
        dl_non_contending = 0x0,
        dl_overrun = 0x0,
        dl_server = 0x1,
        dl_server_active = 0x1,
        dl_defer = 0x1,
        dl_defer_armed = 0x0,
        dl_defer_running = 0x1,
        dl_timer = (
          node = (
            expires = 0x000008199756E700),
          _softexpires = 0x000008199756E700,
          function = 0xFFFFFFDB9AF44D30 = dl_task_timer,
          base = 0xFFFFFF83CD5A12C0,
          state = 0x0,
          is_rel = 0x0,
          is_soft = 0x0,
    clock_update_flags = 0x4,
    clock = 0x000008204A496900,

- The timer expiration time (rq->curr->dl_server->dl_timer->expires)
  is already in the past, indicating the timer has expired.
- The timer state (rq->curr->dl_server->dl_timer->state) is 0.

[Suspected Root Cause]
--------------------
The relevant code flow in the throttle path of
update_curr_dl_se() as follows:

dequeue_dl_entity(dl_se, 0);                // the DL entity is dequeued

if (unlikely(is_dl_boosted(dl_se) || !start_dl_timer(dl_se))) {
    if (dl_server(dl_se))                   // timer registration fails
        enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);//enqueue immediately
    ...
}

The failure of `start_dl_timer` is caused by attempting to register a
timer with an expiration time that is already in the past. When this
situation persists, the code repeatedly re-enqueues the DL entity
without properly replenishing or restarting the timer, resulting in RT
task may not be scheduled as expected.

[Proposed Solution]:
------------------
Instead of immediately re-enqueuing the DL entity on timer registration
failure, this change ensures the DL entity is properly replenished and
the timer is restarted, preventing RT potential starvation.

Signed-off-by: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index ad45a8fea245..e50cb76c961b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1556,10 +1556,12 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
 		}
 
 		if (unlikely(is_dl_boosted(dl_se) || !start_dl_timer(dl_se))) {
-			if (dl_server(dl_se))
-				enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
-			else
+			if (dl_server(dl_se)) {
+				replenish_dl_new_period(dl_se, rq);
+				start_dl_timer(dl_se);
+			} else {
 				enqueue_task_dl(rq, dl_task_of(dl_se), ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
+			}
 		}
 
 		if (!is_leftmost(dl_se, &rq->dl))
-- 
2.45.2


             reply	other threads:[~2025-06-15 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-15 13:10 Kuyo Chang [this message]
2025-06-16 15:03 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-18 14:20   ` Kuyo Chang
2025-06-19 13:13     ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-20  3:00       ` Kuyo Chang
2025-06-20 15:22         ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-21  2:55           ` Kuyo Chang
2025-07-23 22:22             ` Pierce Wen (溫彥翔)
2025-07-24  8:23               ` juri.lelli
2025-07-30 10:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-07-31 15:00   ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-15  4:35   ` Jiri Slaby
2025-08-20 12:57   ` Diederik de Haas
2025-08-27  6:45 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for kuyo chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250615131129.954975-1-kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
    --to=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®