From: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, seanjc@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing individual bits
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 16:01:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f2ac93d-5fb5-471d-9244-75f98a8fec45@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874j7w2oju.ffs@tglx>
On 8/7/2024 11:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> - fpregs_assert_state_consistent();
> Please keep this unconditional and independent of ti_work. It's a debug
> feature and you kill coverage with making it conditional on ti_work.
Sigh, I'm an idiot.
Thanks!
Xin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-07 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-07 5:47 [PATCH v1 0/3] x86: Write FRED RSP0 on return to userspace Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing individual bits Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-07 16:21 ` Brian Gerst
2024-08-07 23:03 ` Xin Li
2024-08-07 18:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-07 18:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-07 23:01 ` Xin Li [this message]
2024-08-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] x86/msr: Switch between WRMSRNS and WRMSR with the alternatives mechanism Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-07 18:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-09 23:07 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-10 0:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-10 0:25 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 17:52 ` Xin Li
2024-08-16 18:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 19:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-16 21:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 21:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-16 22:27 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 22:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-08-16 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-16 22:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-17 23:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-17 14:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-17 14:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-17 15:44 ` Xin Li
2024-08-17 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-18 5:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-17 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-18 5:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-08-18 6:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-08-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] x86/entry: Set FRED RSP0 on return to userspace instead of context switch Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-07 18:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-07 21:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-07 23:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-09 10:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-08-09 17:37 ` Xin Li
2024-08-09 22:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f2ac93d-5fb5-471d-9244-75f98a8fec45@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®