From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Cc: eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:24:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1188606286.26038.117.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070831180644.GA24174@atjola.homenet>
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 20:06 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > something to do with the nmi hertz adjustment that happens after
> > check_nmi_watchdog() ..
>
> Hm hm, does the same thing (watchdog stuck after check) happen with
> older kernels, ie. those before Stephane's changeset that made it use
> PERFCTR1?
I noticed the frequency gets turned down after check_nmi_watchdog() is
called.. I think it's suppose to trigger once per second, but it's more
like it updates randomly ..
In older kernels it's very slow, but it's more consistent ..
Here is some output ..
morning-glory ~ # cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
0: 103 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 0 0 0 8 IO-APIC-edge i8042
4: 2320 0 0 1 IO-APIC-edge serial
8: 1 0 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
12: 0 0 0 113 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 1143 0 0 10 IO-APIC-edge ide0
16: 227 0 0 1 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb2, eth0
18: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1
19: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3
20: 0 0 0 1 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
NMI: 150 168 124 121
LOC: 6188 6189 6187 6184
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
morning-glory ~ # cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
0: 103 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 0 0 0 8 IO-APIC-edge i8042
4: 2391 0 0 1 IO-APIC-edge serial
8: 1 0 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
12: 0 0 0 113 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 1143 0 0 10 IO-APIC-edge ide0
16: 872 0 0 1 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb2, eth0
18: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1
19: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3
20: 0 0 0 1 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
NMI: 151 168 124 121
LOC: 21443 21444 21442 21439
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
dwalker2 ~ #
If you look at the LOC values you'll notice a lot of time has passed,
with only one NMI and on only one cpu ..
It's possible this is something else completely tho ..
> Maybe you could "activate" the Dprintk in write_watchdog_counter32() to
> see which value gets written to the MSR? (I don't see any switch to
> activate it, so maybe just s/Dprintk(/printk(KERN_WHATEVER / ?)
Here's the only lines printed,
setting INTEL_ARCH_PERFCTR0 to -0x0131385e
setting INTEL_ARCH_PERFCTR0 to -0x0131385e
setting INTEL_ARCH_PERFCTR0 to -0x0131385e
setting INTEL_ARCH_PERFCTR0 to -0x0131385e
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-01 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 0:06 Daniel Walker
2007-08-08 14:20 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-08-08 15:20 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-20 16:44 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-23 20:08 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-23 21:22 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 0:45 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 7:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 9:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-27 11:35 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 16:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:05 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 11:38 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-27 15:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:26 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 17:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:17 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 19:12 ` David Rees
2007-08-29 7:42 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-29 22:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-29 23:59 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-30 8:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-30 15:24 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <32209efe0708300950r5787402l4d02cedd862314fd@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-30 22:11 ` Al Boldi
2007-09-03 12:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-03 13:20 ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-30 15:54 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Bill Davidsen
2007-09-03 12:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 16:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 16:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 17:08 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 18:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 8:11 ` David Rees
2007-08-27 11:42 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 14:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:11 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:54 ` nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21 Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 17:55 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 22:55 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 23:07 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 9:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 14:34 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 17:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 18:30 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 19:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 20:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-29 21:24 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-30 1:21 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-30 21:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 14:43 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 16:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 16:35 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 18:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 0:24 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2007-09-01 1:00 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 1:36 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 19:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-09-01 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 20:46 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 9:12 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-28 20:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 20:21 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1188606286.26038.117.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®