From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: B.Steinbrink@gmx.de, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:21:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070831162146.GD7161@frankl.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1188571401.26038.41.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1184 bytes --]
Daniel,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 07:43:20AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 14:05 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Daniel,
>
> > Yes, I realized I missed a small detail in the switch statement.
> > Could you try the new version?
>
> This patch still has the stuck NMI .. Essentially the same thing that
> happened without the patch..
>
Ok, looks like deaulting to P6 does not quite work.
Here is a new version. This time I used a different approach.
I am must admit I am a bit puzzled by the duplication of information
between the wd_ops and the nmi_watchdog_ctlblk structure. My understanding
is that thelater is used as a cache for the info that needs to be per-cpu.
The wd_ops provides the MSR to use for the counter, yet all the setup_*()
routines hardcode the MSR. Not sure why?
In this patch, the setup_*() routine now extract the MSR from the wd_ops
to copy them into the nmi_watchdog_ctlblk. This is not done for P4 because
of the special and ugly case of HT.
With this approach, we can now create a custom wd_ops for CoreDuo that is
a clone of the intel_arch_wd_ops, except for the MSR.
Could you try this one instead?
Thanks.
--
-Stephane
[-- Attachment #2: coreduo3.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2070 bytes --]
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c
index 9b5d6af..f9066e1 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c
@@ -271,8 +271,8 @@ static int setup_k7_watchdog(unsigned nmi_hz)
unsigned int evntsel;
struct nmi_watchdog_ctlblk *wd = &__get_cpu_var(nmi_watchdog_ctlblk);
- perfctr_msr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0;
- evntsel_msr = MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0;
+ perfctr_msr = wd_ops->perfctr;
+ evntsel_msr = wd_ops->evntsel;
wrmsrl(perfctr_msr, 0UL);
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ static int setup_p6_watchdog(unsigned nmi_hz)
unsigned int evntsel;
struct nmi_watchdog_ctlblk *wd = &__get_cpu_var(nmi_watchdog_ctlblk);
- perfctr_msr = MSR_P6_PERFCTR0;
- evntsel_msr = MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0;
+ perfctr_msr = wd_ops->perfctr;
+ evntsel_msr = wd_ops->evntsel;
/* KVM doesn't implement this MSR */
if (wrmsr_safe(perfctr_msr, 0, 0) < 0)
@@ -577,8 +577,8 @@ static int setup_intel_arch_watchdog(unsigned nmi_hz)
(ebx & ARCH_PERFMON_UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES_PRESENT))
return 0;
- perfctr_msr = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR1;
- evntsel_msr = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL1;
+ perfctr_msr = wd_ops->perfctr;
+ evntsel_msr = wd_ops->evntsel;
wrmsrl(perfctr_msr, 0UL);
@@ -613,6 +613,16 @@ static struct wd_ops intel_arch_wd_ops = {
.evntsel = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL1,
};
+static struct wd_ops coreduo_wd_ops = {
+ .reserve = single_msr_reserve,
+ .unreserve = single_msr_unreserve,
+ .setup = setup_intel_arch_watchdog,
+ .rearm = p6_rearm,
+ .stop = single_msr_stop_watchdog,
+ .perfctr = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0,
+ .evntsel = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0,
+};
+
static void probe_nmi_watchdog(void)
{
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
@@ -623,6 +633,10 @@ static void probe_nmi_watchdog(void)
wd_ops = &k7_wd_ops;
break;
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 14) {
+ wd_ops = &coreduo_wd_ops;
+ break;
+ }
if (cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON)) {
wd_ops = &intel_arch_wd_ops;
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-31 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 0:06 Daniel Walker
2007-08-08 14:20 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-08-08 15:20 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-20 16:44 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-23 20:08 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-23 21:22 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 0:45 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 7:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 9:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-27 11:35 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 16:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:05 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 11:38 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-27 15:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:26 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 17:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:17 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 19:12 ` David Rees
2007-08-29 7:42 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-29 22:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-29 23:59 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-30 8:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-30 15:24 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <32209efe0708300950r5787402l4d02cedd862314fd@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-30 22:11 ` Al Boldi
2007-09-03 12:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-03 13:20 ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-30 15:54 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Bill Davidsen
2007-09-03 12:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 16:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 16:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 17:08 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 18:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 8:11 ` David Rees
2007-08-27 11:42 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 14:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:11 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:54 ` nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21 Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 17:55 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 22:55 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 23:07 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 9:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 14:34 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 17:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 18:30 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 19:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 20:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-29 21:24 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-30 1:21 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-30 21:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 14:43 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 16:21 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2007-08-31 16:35 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 18:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 0:24 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 1:00 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 1:36 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 19:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-09-01 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 20:46 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 9:12 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-28 20:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 20:21 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070831162146.GD7161@frankl.hpl.hp.com \
--to=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome