From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel Walker" <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Natalie Protasevich" <protasnb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:26:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0708270826p7a7fb044re53d0db4094bc3d5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1188227585.2435.192.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com>
On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
[..]
> > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can be
> > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing?
> > >
> > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
> >
> > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release.
>
> Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on
> just bypassing that completely ?
IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems
to be most reasonable.
>
> Daniel
>
>
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-27 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 0:06 nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21 Daniel Walker
2007-08-08 14:20 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-08-08 15:20 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-20 16:44 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-23 20:08 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-23 21:22 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 0:45 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 7:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 9:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-27 11:35 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 16:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:05 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 11:38 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-27 15:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:26 ` Michal Piotrowski [this message]
2007-08-27 15:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 17:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:17 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 19:12 ` David Rees
2007-08-29 7:42 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-29 22:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-29 23:59 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-30 8:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-30 15:24 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <32209efe0708300950r5787402l4d02cedd862314fd@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-30 22:11 ` Al Boldi
2007-09-03 12:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-03 13:20 ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-30 15:54 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Bill Davidsen
2007-09-03 12:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 16:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 16:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 17:08 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 18:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 8:11 ` David Rees
2007-08-27 11:42 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 14:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:11 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:54 ` nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21 Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 17:55 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 22:55 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 23:07 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 9:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 14:34 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 17:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 18:30 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 19:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 20:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-29 21:24 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-30 1:21 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-30 21:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 14:43 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 16:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 16:35 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 18:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 0:24 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 1:00 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 1:36 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 19:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-09-01 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 20:46 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 9:12 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-28 20:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 20:21 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bffcb0e0708270826p7a7fb044re53d0db4094bc3d5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®