From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RE2: [OKS] Module removal
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 00:11:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020702001152.D2295@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31042.1025576745@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>; from kaos@ocs.com.au on Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:25:45PM +1000
Keith Owens wrote:
> This is just one symptom of the overall problem, which is module code
> that adjusts its use count by executing code that belongs to the
> module. The same problem exists on entry to a module function, the
> module can be removed before MOD_INC_USE_COUNT is reached.
Ah yes, now I remember, thanks. I filed that under "improper reference
tracking". After all, why would anybody hold an uncounted reference in
the first place ?
I can understand that the exact number of references may be unknown,
e.g. if I pass a reference to some registration function, which may in
turn hand it to third parties, but why wouldn't I know that there is
at least one reference ?
If some other module B hands out uncounted references on behalf of
some module A, it would seem natural for B to make sure that it
collects them before getting unloaded (and thereby releasing A).
> 1) Do the reference counting outside the module, before it is entered.
Evil, agreed ;-)
- Werner
--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://icapeople.epfl.ch/almesber/_____________________________________/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-02 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-01 20:21 Michael Nguyen
2002-07-02 1:40 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 2:25 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02 3:11 ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2002-07-02 3:42 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02 4:11 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 22:23 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-09 19:23 ` Russ Lewis
2002-07-02 4:08 ` Brian Gerst
2002-07-02 4:53 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02 5:43 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 16:36 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 16:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-07-02 18:05 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-03 3:50 ` Pavel Machek
2002-07-04 4:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-04 6:29 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-04 6:50 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-07 21:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-07 21:41 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-08 0:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-08 6:42 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-08 0:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-08 0:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-08 6:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-08 10:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-09 0:07 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-09 0:27 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-09 3:09 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-09 6:25 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-09 8:59 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-09 11:06 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-04 12:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-09 1:50 ` Kevin O'Connor
2002-07-09 2:37 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 23:35 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-02 22:41 ` RE2: " Alexander Viro
2002-07-02 8:52 ` Helge Hafting
2002-07-02 16:22 ` Werner Almesberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020702001152.D2295@almesberger.net \
--to=wa@almesberger.net \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®