mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>
To: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>,
	Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OKS] Module removal
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:41:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207072341.22896.oliver@neukum.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020707220933.B11999@kushida.apsleyroad.org>

Hi,

> To do this, have the `free_module' function use `smp_call_function' to
> ask every CPU "are you executing code for module XXX?".  The question is
> answered by a routine which walks the stack, checking the instruction
> pointer at each place on the stack to see whether it's inside the module
> of interest.
>
> Yes this is complex, but it's not that complex -- provided you can rely
> on stack walking to find the module.  (It wouldn't work if x86 used
> -fomit-frame-pointer, for example).

How do you find CPU's that are about to execute module code ?

IMHO you need to do this freeze trick before you check the module
usage count.

[..]
> Another possibility would be the RCU thing: execute the module's exit
> function, but keep the module's memory allocated until some safe
> scheduling point later, when you are sure that no CPU can possibly be
> running the module.

But what do you do if that CPU increases the module usage count?

	Regards
		Oliver


  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-07 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-01 20:21 RE2: " Michael Nguyen
2002-07-02  1:40 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02  2:25   ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02  3:11     ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02  3:42       ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02  4:11         ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 22:23         ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-09 19:23         ` Russ Lewis
2002-07-02  4:08     ` Brian Gerst
2002-07-02  4:53       ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02  5:43         ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 16:36           ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 16:50             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-07-02 18:05               ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-03  3:50               ` Pavel Machek
2002-07-04  4:11             ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-04  6:29               ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-04  6:50                 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-07 21:09                   ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-07 21:41                     ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2002-07-08  0:31                       ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-08  6:42                         ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-08  0:18                     ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-08  0:46                       ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-08  6:22                         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-08 10:16                           ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-09  0:07                         ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-09  0:27                           ` Keith Owens
2002-07-09  3:09                             ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-09  6:25                             ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-09  8:59                               ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-09 11:06                                 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-04 12:29                 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-09  1:50                 ` Kevin O'Connor
2002-07-09  2:37                   ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 23:35         ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-02 22:41       ` RE2: " Alexander Viro
2002-07-02  8:52     ` Helge Hafting
2002-07-02 16:22       ` Werner Almesberger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-02 12:20 Ariel Garcia
2002-07-01 17:48 Bill Davidsen
2002-07-01 18:35 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-01 18:42 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2002-07-01 18:45   ` Shawn
2002-07-01 19:57 ` Diego Calleja
2002-07-01 20:03   ` Diego Calleja
2002-07-01 22:20   ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2002-07-01 22:56   ` Ryan Anderson
2002-07-02 11:37 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-07-02 12:04   ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-02 13:13     ` jlnance
2002-07-02 15:20   ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-02 15:53     ` Jonathan Corbet
2002-07-02 16:07       ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-02 17:48         ` Tom Rini
2002-07-02 18:10           ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-02 21:50             ` Ryan Anderson
2002-07-03 22:26               ` Diego Calleja
2002-07-04  0:00                 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-04  8:04               ` Helge Hafting
2002-07-02 16:08     ` Werner Almesberger
     [not found]   ` <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020702075957.24872A-100000@chaos.analogic.c om>
2002-07-04  8:36     ` Mike Galbraith
2002-07-03  0:09 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-07-12 21:51 ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200207072341.22896.oliver@neukum.name \
    --to=oliver@neukum.name \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=wa@almesberger.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®