From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>
To: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>,
Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OKS] Module removal
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:41:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207072341.22896.oliver@neukum.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020707220933.B11999@kushida.apsleyroad.org>
Hi,
> To do this, have the `free_module' function use `smp_call_function' to
> ask every CPU "are you executing code for module XXX?". The question is
> answered by a routine which walks the stack, checking the instruction
> pointer at each place on the stack to see whether it's inside the module
> of interest.
>
> Yes this is complex, but it's not that complex -- provided you can rely
> on stack walking to find the module. (It wouldn't work if x86 used
> -fomit-frame-pointer, for example).
How do you find CPU's that are about to execute module code ?
IMHO you need to do this freeze trick before you check the module
usage count.
[..]
> Another possibility would be the RCU thing: execute the module's exit
> function, but keep the module's memory allocated until some safe
> scheduling point later, when you are sure that no CPU can possibly be
> running the module.
But what do you do if that CPU increases the module usage count?
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-07 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-01 20:21 RE2: " Michael Nguyen
2002-07-02 1:40 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 2:25 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02 3:11 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 3:42 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02 4:11 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 22:23 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-09 19:23 ` Russ Lewis
2002-07-02 4:08 ` Brian Gerst
2002-07-02 4:53 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-02 5:43 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 16:36 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 16:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-07-02 18:05 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-03 3:50 ` Pavel Machek
2002-07-04 4:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-04 6:29 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-04 6:50 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-07 21:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-07 21:41 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2002-07-08 0:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-08 6:42 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-08 0:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-08 0:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-07-08 6:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-08 10:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-09 0:07 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-09 0:27 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-09 3:09 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-09 6:25 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-09 8:59 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-09 11:06 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-04 12:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-09 1:50 ` Kevin O'Connor
2002-07-09 2:37 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-07-02 23:35 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-02 22:41 ` RE2: " Alexander Viro
2002-07-02 8:52 ` Helge Hafting
2002-07-02 16:22 ` Werner Almesberger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-02 12:20 Ariel Garcia
2002-07-01 17:48 Bill Davidsen
2002-07-01 18:35 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-01 18:42 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2002-07-01 18:45 ` Shawn
2002-07-01 19:57 ` Diego Calleja
2002-07-01 20:03 ` Diego Calleja
2002-07-01 22:20 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2002-07-01 22:56 ` Ryan Anderson
2002-07-02 11:37 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-07-02 12:04 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-02 13:13 ` jlnance
2002-07-02 15:20 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-02 15:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
2002-07-02 16:07 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-02 17:48 ` Tom Rini
2002-07-02 18:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-02 21:50 ` Ryan Anderson
2002-07-03 22:26 ` Diego Calleja
2002-07-04 0:00 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-04 8:04 ` Helge Hafting
2002-07-02 16:08 ` Werner Almesberger
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020702075957.24872A-100000@chaos.analogic.c om>
2002-07-04 8:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-07-03 0:09 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-07-12 21:51 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200207072341.22896.oliver@neukum.name \
--to=oliver@neukum.name \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=wa@almesberger.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®