From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify MSR read on the boot CPU
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:23:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241106182313.165297-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9afefb7-3c4e-48ee-aab1-2f338c4e989d@intel.com>
Replace the 32-bit MSR access function with a 64-bit variant to simplify
the call site, eliminating unnecessary 32-bit value manipulations.
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
---
I've received feedback to use rdmsrl_on_cpu() instead of rdmsr_on_cpu()
for similar code in my feature-enabling series [1]. While auditing the
tree, I found this case as well, so here's another cleanup.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e9afefb7-3c4e-48ee-aab1-2f338c4e989d@intel.com/
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 0f04feb6cafa..b942cd11e179 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -73,20 +73,17 @@ static unsigned int acpi_pstate_strict;
static bool boost_state(unsigned int cpu)
{
- u32 lo, hi;
u64 msr;
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
case X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR:
case X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN:
- rdmsr_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE, &lo, &hi);
- msr = lo | ((u64)hi << 32);
+ rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE, &msr);
return !(msr & MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_TURBO_DISABLE);
case X86_VENDOR_HYGON:
case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
- rdmsr_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_K7_HWCR, &lo, &hi);
- msr = lo | ((u64)hi << 32);
+ rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_K7_HWCR, &msr);
return !(msr & MSR_K7_HWCR_CPB_DIS);
}
return false;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-01 16:10 [PATCH RFC 0/7] x86/microcode: Support for Intel Staging Feature Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] x86/microcode/intel: Remove unnecessary cache writeback and invalidation Chang S. Bae
2024-10-25 16:24 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] x86/microcode: Introduce staging option to reduce late-loading latency Chang S. Bae
2024-11-04 10:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] x86/msr-index: Define MSR index and bit for the microcode staging feature Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare for microcode staging Chang S. Bae
2024-11-04 11:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-04 16:08 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-04 18:34 ` Chang S. Bae
2024-11-04 20:10 ` Chang S. Bae
2024-11-06 18:23 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2024-11-12 20:44 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify MSR read on the boot CPU Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-06 18:28 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare for microcode staging Chang S. Bae
2024-11-07 1:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-08 22:42 ` Chang S. Bae
2024-11-08 22:51 ` Dave Hansen
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] x86/microcode/intel_staging: Implement staging logic Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] x86/microcode/intel_staging: Support mailbox data transfer Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] x86/microcode/intel: Enable staging when available Chang S. Bae
2024-12-11 1:42 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/microcode: Support for Intel Staging Feature Chang S. Bae
2024-12-11 1:42 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/microcode: Introduce staging option to reduce late-loading latency Chang S. Bae
2025-02-17 13:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-18 7:51 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-02-18 11:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-18 15:16 ` Dave Hansen
2024-12-11 1:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/msr-index: Define MSR index and bit for the microcode staging feature Chang S. Bae
2025-02-26 17:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-11 1:42 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare for microcode staging Chang S. Bae
2025-02-26 17:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-11 1:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/microcode/intel_staging: Implement staging logic Chang S. Bae
2025-02-18 20:16 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-26 17:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-11 1:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/microcode/intel_staging: Support mailbox data transfer Chang S. Bae
2025-02-18 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-20 23:42 ` Chang S. Bae
2024-12-11 1:42 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/microcode/intel: Enable staging when available Chang S. Bae
2025-02-07 18:37 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/microcode: Support for Intel Staging Feature Chang S. Bae
2025-02-28 22:27 ` Colin Mitchell
2025-02-28 22:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 23:23 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-26 21:29 ` Colin Mitchell
2025-04-02 17:14 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 23:05 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241106182313.165297-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®