mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/microcode: Support for Intel Staging Feature
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:37:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0cf3395-ed21-4f48-ab49-81c67f6a032a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241211014213.3671-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

On 12/10/2024 5:42 PM, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> 
> This series is based on 6.13-rc2. You can also find it from this repo:
>      git://github.com/intel-staging/microcode.git staging_v1

I've rebased on 6.14-rc1 and found no conflict, pushing to the repo:
     git://github.com/intel-staging/microcode.git staging_v1-for-6.14-rc1

>    3. Staging Policy (TODO):
> 
>       While staging is always attempted, the system will fall back to the
>       legacy update method if staging fails. There is an open question
>       regarding staging policy: should it be mandatory, without fallback,
>       in certain usage scenarios? This could lead further refinements in
>       the flow depending on feedback and use cases.

While I noted this as "TODO", the policy part may require a separate 
follow-up.

At the moment, I’d like to assess its current state and ensure the 
review process covers details up to the mailbox handling logic, while 
fully respecting the maintainers' schedule.

Also, feedback from those considering this feature is highly appreciated 
here. If the series looks good, I hope to collect ack or review tags to 
help move it forward.

Thanks,
Chang

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-01 16:10 [PATCH RFC 0/7] " Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] x86/microcode/intel: Remove unnecessary cache writeback and invalidation Chang S. Bae
2024-10-25 16:24   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] x86/microcode: Introduce staging option to reduce late-loading latency Chang S. Bae
2024-11-04 10:45   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] x86/msr-index: Define MSR index and bit for the microcode staging feature Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare for microcode staging Chang S. Bae
2024-11-04 11:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-04 16:08     ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-04 18:34       ` Chang S. Bae
2024-11-04 20:10         ` Chang S. Bae
2024-11-06 18:23           ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify MSR read on the boot CPU Chang S. Bae
2024-11-12 20:44             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-06 18:28     ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare for microcode staging Chang S. Bae
2024-11-07  1:12       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-08 22:42         ` Chang S. Bae
2024-11-08 22:51         ` Dave Hansen
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] x86/microcode/intel_staging: Implement staging logic Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] x86/microcode/intel_staging: Support mailbox data transfer Chang S. Bae
2024-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] x86/microcode/intel: Enable staging when available Chang S. Bae
2024-12-11  1:42 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/microcode: Support for Intel Staging Feature Chang S. Bae
2024-12-11  1:42   ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/microcode: Introduce staging option to reduce late-loading latency Chang S. Bae
2025-02-17 13:33     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-18  7:51       ` Chang S. Bae
2025-02-18 11:36         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-18 15:16     ` Dave Hansen
2024-12-11  1:42   ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/msr-index: Define MSR index and bit for the microcode staging feature Chang S. Bae
2025-02-26 17:19     ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-11  1:42   ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare for microcode staging Chang S. Bae
2025-02-26 17:52     ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-11  1:42   ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/microcode/intel_staging: Implement staging logic Chang S. Bae
2025-02-18 20:16     ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-26 17:56     ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-11  1:42   ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/microcode/intel_staging: Support mailbox data transfer Chang S. Bae
2025-02-18 20:54     ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-20 23:42       ` Chang S. Bae
2024-12-11  1:42   ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/microcode/intel: Enable staging when available Chang S. Bae
2025-02-07 18:37   ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2025-02-28 22:27     ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/microcode: Support for Intel Staging Feature Colin Mitchell
2025-02-28 22:52       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 23:23         ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-26 21:29           ` Colin Mitchell
2025-04-02 17:14             ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 23:05       ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0cf3395-ed21-4f48-ab49-81c67f6a032a@intel.com \
    --to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®