From: Zenghui Yu <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 01/22] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 01:50:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <343a7e07-7fad-4979-9c9b-82ec038c293c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6269a53221b9439b9ca00d18a9d1946fb64d8cff.1775065312.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
On 4/2/26 5:52 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
> From: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
>
> Adds infrastructure to enable cache-aware load balancing,
> which improves cache locality by grouping tasks that share resources
> within the same cache domain. This reduces cache misses and improves
> overall data access efficiency.
>
> In this initial implementation, threads belonging to the same process
> are treated as entities that likely share working sets. The mechanism
> tracks per-process CPU occupancy across cache domains and attempts to
> migrate threads toward cache-hot domains where their process already
> has active threads, thereby enhancing locality.
>
> This provides a basic model for cache affinity. While the current code
> targets the last-level cache (LLC), the approach could be extended to
> other domain types such as clusters (L2) or node-internal groupings.
>
> At present, the mechanism selects the CPU within an LLC that has the
> highest recent runtime. Subsequent patches in this series will use this
> information in the load-balancing path to guide task placement toward
> preferred LLCs.
>
> In the future, more advanced policies could be integrated through NUMA
> balancing-for example, migrating a task to its preferred LLC when spare
> capacity exists, or swapping tasks across LLCs to improve cache affinity.
> Grouping of tasks could also be generalized from that of a process
> to be that of a NUMA group, or be user configurable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v3->v4:
> No change.
>
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 32 +++++
> include/linux/sched.h | 24 ++++
> init/Kconfig | 11 ++
> kernel/fork.c | 6 +
> kernel/sched/core.c | 6 +
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 266 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 14 +++
> 7 files changed, 359 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 3cc8ae722886..67b2dfcc71ea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -1173,6 +1173,8 @@ struct mm_struct {
> /* MM CID related storage */
> struct mm_mm_cid mm_cid;
>
> + /* sched_cache related statistics */
> + struct sched_cache_stat sc_stat;
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> atomic_long_t pgtables_bytes; /* size of all page tables */
> #endif
> @@ -1575,6 +1577,36 @@ static inline unsigned int mm_cid_size(void)
> # define MM_CID_STATIC_SIZE 0
> #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> +void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + struct sched_cache_time __percpu *pcpu_sched);
> +
> +static inline int mm_alloc_sched_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + struct sched_cache_time __percpu *pcpu_sched =
> + alloc_percpu_noprof(struct sched_cache_time);
> +
> + if (!pcpu_sched)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mm_init_sched(mm, pcpu_sched);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define mm_alloc_sched(...) alloc_hooks(mm_alloc_sched_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> +
> +static inline void mm_destroy_sched(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + free_percpu(mm->sc_stat.pcpu_sched);
> + mm->sc_stat.pcpu_sched = NULL;
> +}
> +#else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE */
> +
> +static inline int mm_alloc_sched(struct mm_struct *mm) { return 0; }
> +static inline void mm_destroy_sched(struct mm_struct *mm) { }
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE */
> +
> struct mmu_gather;
> extern void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm);
> extern void tlb_gather_mmu_fullmm(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm);
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index a7b4a980eb2f..bd33f5b9096b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1406,6 +1406,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> unsigned long numa_pages_migrated;
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> + struct callback_head cache_work;
> +#endif
> +
> struct rseq_data rseq;
> struct sched_mm_cid mm_cid;
>
> @@ -2376,6 +2380,26 @@ static __always_inline int task_mm_cid(struct task_struct *t)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> +
> +struct sched_cache_time {
> + u64 runtime;
> + unsigned long epoch;
> +};
> +
> +struct sched_cache_stat {
> + struct sched_cache_time __percpu *pcpu_sched;
> + raw_spinlock_t lock;
> + unsigned long epoch;
> + int cpu;
> +} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> +
> +#else
> +
> +struct sched_cache_stat { };
> +
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef MODULE
> #ifndef COMPILE_OFFSETS
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 444ce811ea67..d1f3579d6ea4 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1005,6 +1005,17 @@ config NUMA_BALANCING
>
> This system will be inactive on UMA systems.
>
> +config SCHED_CACHE
> + bool "Cache aware load balance"
> + default y
> + depends on SMP
> + help
> + When enabled, the scheduler will attempt to aggregate tasks from
> + the same process onto a single Last Level Cache (LLC) domain when
> + possible. This improves cache locality by keeping tasks that share
> + resources within the same cache domain, reducing cache misses and
> + lowering data access latency.
> +
> config NUMA_BALANCING_DEFAULT_ENABLED
> bool "Automatically enable NUMA aware memory/task placement"
> default y
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 65113a304518..98ef5c997cc3 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -724,6 +724,7 @@ void __mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
> cleanup_lazy_tlbs(mm);
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(mm == current->active_mm);
> + mm_destroy_sched(mm);
> mm_free_pgd(mm);
> mm_free_id(mm);
> destroy_context(mm);
> @@ -1124,6 +1125,9 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
> if (mm_alloc_cid(mm, p))
> goto fail_cid;
>
> + if (mm_alloc_sched(mm))
> + goto fail_sched;
> +
> if (percpu_counter_init_many(mm->rss_stat, 0, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT,
> NR_MM_COUNTERS))
> goto fail_pcpu;
> @@ -1133,6 +1137,8 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
> return mm;
>
> fail_pcpu:
> + mm_destroy_sched(mm);
> +fail_sched:
> mm_destroy_cid(mm);
> fail_cid:
> destroy_context(mm);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index b7f77c165a6e..eff8695000e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4437,6 +4437,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(u64 clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
> init_numa_balancing(clone_flags, p);
> p->wake_entry.u_flags = CSD_TYPE_TTWU;
> p->migration_pending = NULL;
> + init_sched_mm(p);
> }
>
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_numa_balancing);
> @@ -8749,6 +8750,11 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>
> rq->core_cookie = 0UL;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&rq->cpu_epoch_lock);
> + rq->cpu_epoch_next = jiffies;
> +#endif
> +
> zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scratch_mask, GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index bf948db905ed..eb3cfb852a93 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1228,6 +1228,8 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct task_struct *p)
> sa->runnable_avg = sa->util_avg;
> }
>
> +static inline void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec);
> +
> static s64 update_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> u64 now = rq_clock_task(rq);
> @@ -1250,6 +1252,7 @@ static s64 update_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>
> trace_sched_stat_runtime(running, delta_exec);
> account_group_exec_runtime(running, delta_exec);
> + account_mm_sched(rq, running, delta_exec);
>
> /* cgroup time is always accounted against the donor */
> cgroup_account_cputime(donor, delta_exec);
> @@ -1271,6 +1274,267 @@ static s64 update_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>
> static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> +
> +/*
> + * XXX numbers come from a place the sun don't shine -- probably wants to be SD
> + * tunable or so.
> + */
> +#define EPOCH_PERIOD (HZ / 100) /* 10 ms */
> +#define EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT 5 /* 50 ms */
> +
> +static int llc_id(int cpu)
> +{
> + if (cpu < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu);
> +}
> +
> +void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + struct sched_cache_time __percpu *_pcpu_sched)
> +{
> + unsigned long epoch = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> + struct sched_cache_time *pcpu_sched = per_cpu_ptr(_pcpu_sched, i);
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
> +
> + pcpu_sched->runtime = 0;
> + /* a slightly stale cpu epoch is acceptible */
> + pcpu_sched->epoch = rq->cpu_epoch;
> + epoch = rq->cpu_epoch;
> + }
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&mm->sc_stat.lock);
> + mm->sc_stat.epoch = epoch;
> + mm->sc_stat.cpu = -1;
> +
> + /*
> + * The update to mm->sc_stat should not be reordered
> + * before initialization to mm's other fields, in case
> + * the readers may get invalid mm_sched_epoch, etc.
> + */
> + smp_store_release(&mm->sc_stat.pcpu_sched, _pcpu_sched);
> +}
> +
> +/* because why would C be fully specified */
> +static __always_inline void __shr_u64(u64 *val, unsigned int n)
> +{
> + if (n >= 64) {
> + *val = 0;
> + return;
> + }
> + *val >>= n;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void __update_mm_sched(struct rq *rq,
> + struct sched_cache_time *pcpu_sched)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(&rq->cpu_epoch_lock);
> +
> + unsigned long n, now = jiffies;
> + long delta = now - rq->cpu_epoch_next;
> +
> + if (delta > 0) {
> + n = (delta + EPOCH_PERIOD - 1) / EPOCH_PERIOD;
> + rq->cpu_epoch += n;
> + rq->cpu_epoch_next += n * EPOCH_PERIOD;
> + __shr_u64(&rq->cpu_runtime, n);
> + }
> +
> + n = rq->cpu_epoch - pcpu_sched->epoch;
> + if (n) {
> + pcpu_sched->epoch += n;
> + __shr_u64(&pcpu_sched->runtime, n);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long fraction_mm_sched(struct rq *rq,
> + struct sched_cache_time *pcpu_sched)
> +{
> + guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&rq->cpu_epoch_lock);
> +
> + __update_mm_sched(rq, pcpu_sched);
> +
> + /*
> + * Runtime is a geometric series (r=0.5) and as such will sum to twice
> + * the accumulation period, this means the multiplcation here should
> + * not overflow.
> + */
> + return div64_u64(NICE_0_LOAD * pcpu_sched->runtime, rq->cpu_runtime + 1);
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
> +{
> + struct sched_cache_time *pcpu_sched;
> + struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
> + unsigned long epoch;
> +
> + if (!sched_cache_enabled())
> + return;
> +
> + if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
> + return;
> + /*
> + * init_task, kthreads and user thread created
> + * by user_mode_thread() don't have mm.
> + */
> + if (!mm || !mm->sc_stat.pcpu_sched)
> + return;
> +
> + pcpu_sched = per_cpu_ptr(p->mm->sc_stat.pcpu_sched, cpu_of(rq));
> +
> + scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->cpu_epoch_lock) {
> + __update_mm_sched(rq, pcpu_sched);
> + pcpu_sched->runtime += delta_exec;
> + rq->cpu_runtime += delta_exec;
> + epoch = rq->cpu_epoch;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If this process hasn't hit task_cache_work() for a while, or it
> + * has only 1 thread, invalidate its preferred state.
> + */
> + if (time_after(epoch,
> + READ_ONCE(mm->sc_stat.epoch) + EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT) ||
> + get_nr_threads(p) <= 1) {
> + if (mm->sc_stat.cpu != -1)
> + mm->sc_stat.cpu = -1;
> + }
> +}
I sporadically hit the SLUB "Poison overwritten" reports on the mm_struct
cache while running mm-new:
[Poison overwritten] 0xffff8001076ec8e8-0xffff8001076ec8eb @offset=51432. First byte 0xff instead of 0x6b
=============================================================================
BUG mm_struct (Tainted: G N ): Object corrupt
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocated in copy_process+0x1e48/0x2078 age=2 cpu=7 pid=11866
copy_process+0x1e48/0x2078
kernel_clone+0xa4/0x498
__do_sys_clone+0x5c/0x88
__arm64_sys_clone+0x1c/0x28
invoke_syscall+0x54/0x110
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
el0_svc+0x54/0x424
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa0/0xe4
el0t_64_sync+0x1b0/0x1b4
Freed in __mmdrop+0x108/0x180 age=2 cpu=3 pid=11955
kmem_cache_free+0x290/0x53c
__mmdrop+0x108/0x180
__mmput+0x150/0x154
mmput+0x50/0x5c
exec_mm_put_old+0x74/0x84
setup_new_exec+0x7c/0x90
load_elf_binary+0x4b0/0x1914
bprm_execve+0x300/0x83c
do_execveat_common+0x168/0x1cc
__arm64_sys_execve+0x44/0x68
invoke_syscall+0x54/0x110
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
el0_svc+0x54/0x424
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa0/0xe4
el0t_64_sync+0x1b0/0x1b4
Slab 0xffffffbfc1076e00 objects=23 used=18 fp=0xffff8001076e2140 flags=0x13fffe0000000240(workingset|head|node=1|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)
Object 0xffff8001076ec640 @offset=50752 fp=0xffff8001076e2140
[...]
The corruption is always exactly 4 bytes (0xffffffff) with everything
around still being intact poison. The in-object offset (51432 - 50752 =
680) resolves to &mm->sc_stat.cpu, and 0xffffffff is just -1. My AI model
points me to this write in account_mm_sched():
if (READ_ONCE(mm->sc_stat.cpu) != -1)
WRITE_ONCE(mm->sc_stat.cpu, -1);
and helps with analyzing and fixing the issue like below :-) . Please have
a look.
Thanks,
Zenghui
---8<---
From 992b515f18710e77308cf5f88943cc3ce918a525 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Zenghui Yu (Huawei)" <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 22:00:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] sched/cache: Fix use-after-free of mm in account_mm_sched()
account_mm_sched() accounts runtime against rq->curr and dereferences its
->mm: it updates the percpu chunk mm->sc_stat.pcpu_sched and may write
mm->sc_stat.cpu = -1.
update_se(), which samples rq->curr and calls account_mm_sched(), is not
only called from local contexts (tick, context switch) but also through
update_curr() from enqueue/dequeue paths, which frequently run on a remote
CPU while holding this rq's lock (cross-CPU try_to_wake_up(), load
balancing).
In those remote contexts rq->curr is a task concurrently running on its
home CPU. The rq lock guarantees that rq->curr's identity does not change,
but it says nothing about the lifetime of rq->curr->mm: that task does not
need the rq lock to execute execve or exit, and switches and drops its ->mm
under task_lock() and mmput(), neither of which orders against the remote
CPU. A remote CPU can therefore sample a valid mm pointer right before it
is freed and write to it afterwards, corrupting the freed mm_struct (and
the pcpu_sched percpu chunk, which mm_destroy_sched() frees even earlier).
Observed with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y as a sporadic "Poison overwritten" report
on the mm_struct cache, with the overwritten bytes resolving to
&mm->sc_stat.cpu.
Only account the physically running task (p == current), whose ->mm cannot
go away while it is the one executing this code. Local tick, context
switch and sched_ttwu_pending() paths are unaffected; updates skipped in
remote contexts only cause minor under-accounting of the sc_stat runtime
heuristics.
Fixes: df0d98475954 ("sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing")
Assisted-by: GLM-5.3 OpenCode
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu (Huawei) <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ade1eceb39b8..2bbf59370d23 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1731,6 +1731,9 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
int mm_sched_llc = -1;
unsigned long epoch;
+ if (p != current)
+ return;
+
if (!sched_cache_enabled())
return;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 21:52 [Patch v4 00/22] Cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 01/22] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:21 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-09 23:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 6:30 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-15 2:06 ` Vern Hao
2026-04-15 3:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-09-14 17:50 ` Zenghui Yu [this message]
2026-09-14 23:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 02/22] sched/cache: Limit the scan number of CPUs when calculating task occupancy Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:17 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-09 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 10:12 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-10 7:29 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10 10:20 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-10 17:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-10 17:27 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-13 7:23 ` [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: dynamically scale the period of cache work Jianyong Wu
2026-04-13 8:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-13 11:27 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-15 3:31 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-16 3:39 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-15 17:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-16 6:50 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-14 15:07 ` [PATCH v2] sched/cache: Reduce the overhead of task_cache_work by only scan the visisted cpus Luo Gengkun
2026-04-15 3:10 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-18 9:01 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-20 7:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-23 8:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Luo Gengkun
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 03/22] sched/cache: Record per LLC utilization to guide cache aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 04/22] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 05/22] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 06/22] sched/cache: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 07/22] sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 08/22] sched/cache: Introduce per CPU's tasks LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 09/22] sched/cache: Calculate the percpu sd task LLC preference Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 10/22] sched/cache: Count tasks prefering destination LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 11/22] sched/cache: Check local_group only once in update_sg_lb_stats() Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 12/22] sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 13/22] sched/cache: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 14/22] sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 15/22] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 16/22] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:27 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 17/22] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 8:59 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 18/22] sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for multi LLCs NUMA node Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:39 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 19/22] sched/cache: Allow the user space to turn on and off cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 20/22] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 21/22] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Display the per LLC occupancy for each process via proc fs Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 22/22] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Add ftrace to track the load balance statistics Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:54 ` [Patch v4 00/22] Cache aware scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 20:02 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-14 3:20 ` Duan Tingyin
2026-04-15 17:35 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-16 0:27 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-20 9:01 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-21 0:34 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-21 20:57 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-23 15:06 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-23 16:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-25 0:05 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-23 17:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-25 0:14 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=343a7e07-7fad-4979-9c9b-82ec038c293c@linux.dev \
--to=zenghui.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®