From: albin_yang@163.com
To: kprateek.nayak@amd.com
Cc: albin_yang@163.com, albinwyang@tencent.com, bsegall@google.com,
chen.yu@linux.dev, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, kayracizmeci@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/stats: Fix run_delay over-count for proxy-migrated blocked donors
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 21:38:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026133831.4111227-1-albin_yang@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72a6eb77-0461-477b-a0e9-c06a486e3e0e@amd.com>
Hi Prateek,
Thanks - using is_blocked as the single indicator is certainly cleaner than
piling up exceptions.
I rebuilt your diff so it applies cleanly and gave it a run. I'm afraid it
does not work as-is in my testing - two problems:
1) sched_info_depart() now calls __sched_info_dequeue(), which no longer has
the "if (!last_queued) return;" guard. A blocking task has last_queued == 0
(sched_info_arrive() cleared it at switch-in), so delta becomes
rq_clock(rq) - 0, i.e. the whole uptime:
cross-cpu: blocked 169.80 ms, run_delay delta 169047.52 ms
same-cpu: blocked 168.70 ms, run_delay delta 185515.00 ms
The control is affected too, so this is not proxy specific.
2) sched_info_enqueue() now arms only when t->is_blocked, leaving ordinary
runnable tasks with no counter at all - my sanity check went from +39 ms to
0.00 ms in every iteration, including the control. I do not think either
polarity works: is_blocked is still set during the real wakeup enqueue
(delayed sleeper: inside ttwu_runnable()'s is_blocked branch; donor: cleared
only later by ttwu_do_wakeup()). So it can gate the charge side, but the
arming side needs something already cleared at wakeup - task_is_blocked() or
sched_delayed.
The delayed reproducer shows 0, but that is easy to misread: it measures only a
delta, and the bogus depart charge lands before the window. Its absolute
run_delay is polluted too. (The 0.00 ms sanity figure is from the proxy
reproducer, which carries that check.)
For reference, !sched_delayed && !task_is_blocked() gives 0.01 ms on the proxy
case with the sanity check intact (+39 ms), and 0/20 on the delayed reproducer.
Happy to retest whatever you come up with.
Thanks,
Wei Yang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 13:07 albin_yang
2026-10-25 19:28 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-26 13:53 ` albin_yang
2026-10-26 14:48 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-26 5:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-26 13:38 ` albin_yang [this message]
2026-10-27 4:11 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 6:11 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-27 6:24 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 6:52 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-27 9:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 9:53 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-27 9:58 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-27 12:13 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-28 3:40 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-28 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-01 14:31 ` albin_yang
2026-11-01 15:19 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-02 13:15 ` albin_yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261026133831.4111227-1-albin_yang@163.com \
--to=albin_yang@163.com \
--cc=albinwyang@tencent.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chen.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®