Re: [PATCH v3 01/24] x86/tdx: Enhance tdh_mem_page_aug() to support huge pages

[Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>]

On 1/8/26 11:05, Ackerley Tng wrote:
...
>> All of those properties are important and they're *GONE* if you use a
>> pfn. It's even worse if you use a raw physical address.
> 
> We were thinking through what it would take to have TDs use VM_PFNMAP
> memory, where the memory may not actually have associated struct
> pages. Without further work, having struct pages in the TDX interface
> would kind of lock out those sources of memory. Is TDX open to using
> non-kernel managed memory?

I was afraid someone was going to bring that up. I'm not open to such a
beast today. I'd certainly look at the patches, but it would be a hard
sell and it would need an awfully strong justification.

> For type safety, would phyrs help? [1] Perhaps starting with pfn/paddrs
> + nr_pages would allow transitioning to phyrs later. Using pages would
> be okay for now, but I would rather not use folios.

I don't have any first-hand experience with phyrs. It seems interesting,
but might be unwieldy to use in practice, kinda how the proposed code
got messy when folios got thrown in.