mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
	Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
	Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
	Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
	Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 16/28] sched: Consider LLC locality for active balance
Date: Sat,  9 Aug 2025 13:06:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38d036cf946223b46a20ad60ccf13f9dcb316240.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

If busiest run queue has only one task, active balance is enlisted
to actually move the task.  However, before moving the task,
we should consider whether we are moving the task from its preferred
LLC.

Don't move the single running task in a run queue to another LLC, if
we are moving it from its desired LLC, or moving it will cause too much
imbalance between the LLCs.

Co-developed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a301b56dd2b4..592a4034e760 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12332,10 +12332,43 @@ imbalanced_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
+static inline bool
+break_llc_locality(struct lb_env *env)
+{
+	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (cpus_share_cache(env->src_cpu, env->dst_cpu))
+		return 0;
+	/*
+	 * All tasks want to stay put. Move only if LLC is
+	 * heavily loaded or don't pull a task from its
+	 * preferred CPU if it is the only one running.
+	 */
+	if (env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable &&
+	    (env->src_rq->nr_running <= 1 ||
+	    _get_migrate_hint(env->src_cpu, env->dst_cpu,
+			      0, false) == mig_forbid))
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#else
+static inline bool
+break_llc_locality(struct lb_env *env)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
 {
 	struct sched_domain *sd = env->sd;
 
+	if (break_llc_locality(env))
+		return 0;
+
 	if (asym_active_balance(env))
 		return 1;
 
@@ -12355,7 +12388,8 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
 			return 1;
 	}
 
-	if (env->migration_type == migrate_misfit)
+	if (env->migration_type == migrate_misfit ||
+	    env->migration_type == migrate_llc_task)
 		return 1;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -12800,9 +12834,20 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	/* Is there any task to move? */
-	if (busiest_rq->nr_running <= 1)
-		goto out_unlock;
+	if (busiest_rq->nr_running <= 1) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
+		int llc = llc_idx(target_cpu);
 
+		if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE))
+			goto out_unlock;
+
+		if (llc < 0)
+			goto out_unlock;
+		/* don't migrate if task does not prefer target */
+		if (busiest_rq->nr_pref_llc[llc] < 1)
+#endif
+			goto out_unlock;
+	}
 	/*
 	 * This condition is "impossible", if it occurs
 	 * we need to fix it. Originally reported by
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-09  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-09  4:57 [RFC PATCH v4 00/28] Cache aware load-balancing Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/28] sched: " Chen Yu
2025-08-12  1:30   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-12  3:26     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:01 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/28] sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:01 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/28] sched: Avoid task migration within its preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/28] sched: Avoid calculating the cpumask if the system is overloaded Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/28] sched: Add hysteresis to switch a task's preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-09-29 13:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30  4:31     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/28] sched: Save the per LLC utilization for better cache aware scheduling Chen Yu
2025-09-29 14:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30  4:34     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/28] sched: Add helper function to decide whether to allow " Chen Yu
2025-10-01 13:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 11:31     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-02 11:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 12:51         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-02 17:46         ` Tim Chen
2025-08-09  5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/28] sched: Set up LLC indexing Chen Yu
2025-09-26  6:14   ` Adam Li
2025-09-26 13:51     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-29 10:43       ` Adam Li
2025-09-30  2:54         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/28] sched: Introduce task preferred LLC field Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/28] sched: Calculate the number of tasks that have LLC preference on a runqueue Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/28] sched: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/28] sched: Calculate the total number of preferred LLC tasks during load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/28] sched: Tag the sched group as llc_balance if it has tasks prefer other LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/28] sched: Introduce update_llc_busiest() to deal with groups having preferred LLC tasks Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/28] sched: Introduce a new migration_type to track the preferred LLC load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:06 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2025-08-09  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/28] sched: Consider LLC preference when picking tasks from busiest queue Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/28] sched: Do not migrate task if it is moving out of its preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/28] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_LB to control cache aware load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/28] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_WAKE to control LLC aggregation on wake up Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/28] sched: Introduce a static key to enable cache aware only for multi LLCs Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/28] sched: Turn EPOCH_PERIOD and EPOCH_OLD into tunnable debugfs Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/28] sched: Scan a task's preferred node for preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-12  1:59   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-12  3:36     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/28] sched: Record average number of runninhg tasks per process Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/28] sched: Skip cache aware scheduling if the process has many active threads Chen Yu
2025-09-02  3:52   ` Tingyin Duan
2025-09-02  5:16   ` Tingyin Duan
2025-09-02  6:14     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-02  7:56       ` Duan Tingyin
2025-08-09  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/28] sched: Do not enable cache aware scheduling for process with large RSS Chen Yu
2025-09-26  8:48   ` Adam Li
2025-09-26 14:30     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:09 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/28] sched: Allow the user space to tune the scale factor for RSS comparison Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:09 ` [RFC PATCH v4 28/28] sched: Add ftrace to track cache aware load balance and hottest CPU changes Chen Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38d036cf946223b46a20ad60ccf13f9dcb316240.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
    --cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®