From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 28/28] sched: Add ftrace to track cache aware load balance and hottest CPU changes
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 13:09:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e3622a5b2129b56741989f15a8debabec064de9.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Introduce 3 trace events:
1.
The average time spent scanning CPUs and calculating occupancy
in each sample period. This event can be used to track the
overhead of cache-aware scheduling.
2.
The footprint when switching to a new mm_sched_cpu (a cache-hot CPU).
This event can be used to track whether there is any abnormal
bouncing of mm_sched_cpu.
3.
The footprint of load balancing when migrating a task between CPUs.
This event can be used to track whether cache-aware load balancing
behaves as expected.
All these events can be used with bpftrace to gain a basic
understanding of whether cache-aware scheduling is effective.
Suggested-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/sched.h | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 25 ++++++++--
2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h
index 4e6b2910cec3..398180c18946 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -10,6 +10,99 @@
#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
#include <linux/binfmts.h>
+TRACE_EVENT(sched_scan_cost,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *t, u64 cost, int nr,
+ u64 old_running, u64 new_running),
+
+ TP_ARGS(t, cost, nr, old_running, new_running),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
+ __field( pid_t, pid )
+ __field( u64, cost )
+ __field( int, nr )
+ __field( u64, old_running )
+ __field( u64, new_running )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ memcpy(__entry->comm, t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ __entry->pid = t->pid;
+ __entry->cost = cost;
+ __entry->nr = nr;
+ __entry->old_running = old_running;
+ __entry->new_running = new_running;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d cost=%llu nr=%d old_r=%lld new_r=%lld",
+ __entry->comm, __entry->pid,
+ __entry->cost, __entry->nr,
+ __entry->old_running, __entry->new_running)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(sched_cache_work,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *t, int pref_cpu, int pref_llc,
+ int new_cpu, int new_llc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(t, pref_cpu, pref_llc, new_cpu, new_llc),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
+ __field( pid_t, pid )
+ __field( int, pref_cpu )
+ __field( int, pref_llc )
+ __field( int, new_cpu )
+ __field( int, new_llc )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ memcpy(__entry->comm, t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ __entry->pid = t->pid;
+ __entry->pref_cpu = pref_cpu;
+ __entry->pref_llc = pref_llc;
+ __entry->new_cpu = new_cpu;
+ __entry->new_llc = new_llc;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d pref_cpu=%d pref_llc=%d attach_cpu=%d attach_llc=%d",
+ __entry->comm, __entry->pid,
+ __entry->pref_cpu, __entry->pref_llc,
+ __entry->new_cpu, __entry->new_llc)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(sched_attach_task,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *t, int pref_cpu, int pref_llc,
+ int attach_cpu, int attach_llc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(t, pref_cpu, pref_llc, attach_cpu, attach_llc),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
+ __field( pid_t, pid )
+ __field( int, pref_cpu )
+ __field( int, pref_llc )
+ __field( int, attach_cpu )
+ __field( int, attach_llc )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ memcpy(__entry->comm, t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ __entry->pid = t->pid;
+ __entry->pref_cpu = pref_cpu;
+ __entry->pref_llc = pref_llc;
+ __entry->attach_cpu = attach_cpu;
+ __entry->attach_llc = attach_llc;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("comm=%s pid=%d pref_cpu=%d pref_llc=%d attach_cpu=%d attach_llc=%d",
+ __entry->comm, __entry->pid,
+ __entry->pref_cpu, __entry->pref_llc,
+ __entry->attach_cpu, __entry->attach_llc)
+);
+
/*
* Tracepoint for calling kthread_stop, performed to end a kthread:
*/
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 018825f04063..cb2c33ee0d92 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1467,8 +1467,9 @@ static void __no_profile task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
unsigned long last_m_a_occ = 0;
int cpu, m_a_cpu = -1, cache_cpu,
pref_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE, curr_cpu = smp_processor_id(),
- nr_running = 0;
+ nr_running = 0, nr_scan = 0;
cpumask_var_t cpus;
+ u64 t0, scan_cost = 0;
WARN_ON_ONCE(work != &p->cache_work);
@@ -1499,6 +1500,7 @@ static void __no_profile task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
pref_nid = p->numa_preferred_nid;
#endif
+ t0 = sched_clock_cpu(curr_cpu);
scoped_guard (cpus_read_lock) {
get_scan_cpumasks(cpus, cache_cpu,
pref_nid, curr_cpu);
@@ -1521,6 +1523,7 @@ static void __no_profile task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
m_cpu = i;
}
nr++;
+ nr_scan++;
rcu_read_lock();
cur = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(i)->curr);
@@ -1529,8 +1532,8 @@ static void __no_profile task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
nr_running++;
rcu_read_unlock();
- trace_printk("(%d) occ: %ld m_occ: %ld m_cpu: %d nr: %d\n",
- per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i), occ, m_occ, m_cpu, nr);
+ //trace_printk("(%d) occ: %ld m_occ: %ld m_cpu: %d nr: %d\n",
+ // per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i), occ, m_occ, m_cpu, nr);
}
// a_occ /= nr;
@@ -1541,8 +1544,8 @@ static void __no_profile task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
if (llc_id(cpu) == llc_id(mm->mm_sched_cpu))
last_m_a_occ = a_occ;
- trace_printk("(%d) a_occ: %ld m_a_occ: %ld\n",
- per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu), a_occ, m_a_occ);
+ //trace_printk("(%d) a_occ: %ld m_a_occ: %ld\n",
+ // per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu), a_occ, m_a_occ);
for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
/* XXX threshold ? */
@@ -1553,12 +1556,17 @@ static void __no_profile task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
}
}
+ scan_cost = sched_clock_cpu(curr_cpu) - t0;
+
if (m_a_occ > (2 * last_m_a_occ)) {
/* avoid the bouncing of mm_sched_cpu */
+ trace_sched_cache_work(p, mm->mm_sched_cpu, llc_id(mm->mm_sched_cpu),
+ m_a_cpu, llc_id(m_a_cpu));
mm->mm_sched_cpu = m_a_cpu;
}
update_avg(&mm->nr_running_avg, nr_running);
+ trace_sched_scan_cost(p, scan_cost, nr_scan, mm->nr_running_avg, nr_running);
free_cpumask_var(cpus);
}
@@ -10443,6 +10451,13 @@ static void attach_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
+ if (p->mm)
+ trace_sched_attach_task(p,
+ p->mm->mm_sched_cpu,
+ p->mm->mm_sched_cpu != -1 ? llc_id(p->mm->mm_sched_cpu) : -1,
+ cpu_of(rq), llc_id(cpu_of(rq)));
+#endif
WARN_ON_ONCE(task_rq(p) != rq);
activate_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
wakeup_preempt(rq, p, 0);
--
2.25.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-09 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-09 4:57 [RFC PATCH v4 00/28] Cache aware load-balancing Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/28] sched: " Chen Yu
2025-08-12 1:30 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-12 3:26 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:01 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/28] sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:01 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/28] sched: Avoid task migration within its preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/28] sched: Avoid calculating the cpumask if the system is overloaded Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/28] sched: Add hysteresis to switch a task's preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-09-29 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30 4:31 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/28] sched: Save the per LLC utilization for better cache aware scheduling Chen Yu
2025-09-29 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30 4:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/28] sched: Add helper function to decide whether to allow " Chen Yu
2025-10-01 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 11:31 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-02 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 12:51 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-02 17:46 ` Tim Chen
2025-08-09 5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/28] sched: Set up LLC indexing Chen Yu
2025-09-26 6:14 ` Adam Li
2025-09-26 13:51 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-29 10:43 ` Adam Li
2025-09-30 2:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/28] sched: Introduce task preferred LLC field Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/28] sched: Calculate the number of tasks that have LLC preference on a runqueue Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/28] sched: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/28] sched: Calculate the total number of preferred LLC tasks during load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/28] sched: Tag the sched group as llc_balance if it has tasks prefer other LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/28] sched: Introduce update_llc_busiest() to deal with groups having preferred LLC tasks Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/28] sched: Introduce a new migration_type to track the preferred LLC load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/28] sched: Consider LLC locality for active balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/28] sched: Consider LLC preference when picking tasks from busiest queue Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/28] sched: Do not migrate task if it is moving out of its preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/28] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_LB to control cache aware load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/28] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_WAKE to control LLC aggregation on wake up Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/28] sched: Introduce a static key to enable cache aware only for multi LLCs Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/28] sched: Turn EPOCH_PERIOD and EPOCH_OLD into tunnable debugfs Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/28] sched: Scan a task's preferred node for preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-12 1:59 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-12 3:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/28] sched: Record average number of runninhg tasks per process Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/28] sched: Skip cache aware scheduling if the process has many active threads Chen Yu
2025-09-02 3:52 ` Tingyin Duan
2025-09-02 5:16 ` Tingyin Duan
2025-09-02 6:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-02 7:56 ` Duan Tingyin
2025-08-09 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/28] sched: Do not enable cache aware scheduling for process with large RSS Chen Yu
2025-09-26 8:48 ` Adam Li
2025-09-26 14:30 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:09 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/28] sched: Allow the user space to tune the scale factor for RSS comparison Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:09 ` Chen Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e3622a5b2129b56741989f15a8debabec064de9.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®