From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 02/28] sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 13:01:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84ceaca0a1de853284b4fc9888af806b03cde8bb.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
1. Fix compile error on percpu allocation.
2. Enqueue to the target CPU rather than the current CPU.
3. NULL LLC sched domain check(Libo Chen).
4. Introduce sched feature SCHED_CACHE to control cache aware scheduling
5. Fix unsigned occupancy initialization to -1.
6. If there is only 1 thread in the process, no need to enable cache
awareness
7. Add __maybe_unused to __migrate_degrades_locality() to
avoid compile warnings.
8. Do not enable gcov coverage for task_cache_work() and
fraction_mm_sched() to avoid softlockup by gcov.
9. Make CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE depending on CONFIG_SMP to
avoid compile error on non-SMP system like microblaze
architecture.
10. Do not enable account cache aware statistics in
account_mm_sched() for non-normal tasks, as it could
be invoked by RT tasks.(Shrikanth Hegde)
11. Place cpu_epoch related fields in a dedicated cache line
to avoid interfering with clock_idle* fields.
(Shrikanth Hegde)
Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
include/linux/mm_types.h | 4 ++--
init/Kconfig | 4 ++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index cf26ad8b41ab..41a598a44361 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -1450,11 +1450,11 @@ static inline void mm_set_cpus_allowed(struct mm_struct *mm, const struct cpumas
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID */
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
-extern void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched *pcpu_sched);
+void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched __percpu *pcpu_sched);
static inline int mm_alloc_sched_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- struct mm_sched *pcpu_sched = alloc_percpu_noprof(struct mm_sched);
+ struct mm_sched __percpu *pcpu_sched = alloc_percpu_noprof(struct mm_sched);
if (!pcpu_sched)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 27f4012347f9..4bab39a5254c 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -950,6 +950,10 @@ config NUMA_BALANCING
config SCHED_CACHE
bool "Cache aware scheduler"
default y
+ depends on SMP
+ help
+ If set, the scheduler will try to aggregate tasks in the same process to
+ a single LLC if possible.
config NUMA_BALANCING_DEFAULT_ENABLED
bool "Automatically enable NUMA aware memory/task placement"
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e3897cd7696d..e97ab46509e3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ static s64 update_curr_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
#define EPOCH_PERIOD (HZ/100) /* 10 ms */
#define EPOCH_OLD 5 /* 50 ms */
-void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched *_pcpu_sched)
+void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched __percpu *_pcpu_sched)
{
unsigned long epoch;
int i;
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched *_pcpu_sched)
pcpu_sched->runtime = 0;
pcpu_sched->epoch = epoch = rq->cpu_epoch;
- pcpu_sched->occ = -1;
+ pcpu_sched->occ = 0;
}
raw_spin_lock_init(&mm->mm_sched_lock);
@@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ static inline void __update_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct mm_sched *pcpu_sched)
}
}
-static unsigned long fraction_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct mm_sched *pcpu_sched)
+static unsigned long __no_profile fraction_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct mm_sched *pcpu_sched)
{
guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&rq->cpu_epoch_lock);
@@ -1248,13 +1248,18 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
struct mm_sched *pcpu_sched;
unsigned long epoch;
+ if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE))
+ return;
+
+ if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
+ return;
/*
* init_task and kthreads don't be having no mm
*/
if (!mm || !mm->pcpu_sched)
return;
- pcpu_sched = this_cpu_ptr(p->mm->pcpu_sched);
+ pcpu_sched = per_cpu_ptr(p->mm->pcpu_sched, cpu_of(rq));
scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->cpu_epoch_lock) {
__update_mm_sched(rq, pcpu_sched);
@@ -1264,12 +1269,14 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
}
/*
- * If this task hasn't hit task_cache_work() for a while, invalidate
+ * If this task hasn't hit task_cache_work() for a while, or it
+ * has only 1 thread, invalidate
* it's preferred state.
*/
- if (epoch - READ_ONCE(mm->mm_sched_epoch) > EPOCH_OLD) {
+ if (epoch - READ_ONCE(mm->mm_sched_epoch) > EPOCH_OLD ||
+ get_nr_threads(p) <= 1) {
mm->mm_sched_cpu = -1;
- pcpu_sched->occ = -1;
+ pcpu_sched->occ = 0;
}
}
@@ -1278,6 +1285,9 @@ static void task_tick_cache(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
struct callback_head *work = &p->cache_work;
struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
+ if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE))
+ return;
+
if (!mm || !mm->pcpu_sched)
return;
@@ -1286,16 +1296,13 @@ static void task_tick_cache(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
guard(raw_spinlock)(&mm->mm_sched_lock);
- if (mm->mm_sched_epoch == rq->cpu_epoch)
- return;
-
if (work->next == work) {
task_work_add(p, work, TWA_RESUME);
WRITE_ONCE(mm->mm_sched_epoch, rq->cpu_epoch);
}
}
-static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
+static void __no_profile task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
{
struct task_struct *p = current;
struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
@@ -1322,6 +1329,9 @@ static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
unsigned long occ, m_occ = 0, a_occ = 0;
int m_cpu = -1, nr = 0, i;
+ if (!sd)
+ continue;
+
for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
occ = fraction_mm_sched(cpu_rq(i),
per_cpu_ptr(mm->pcpu_sched, i));
@@ -8815,6 +8825,9 @@ static int select_cache_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
int cpu;
+ if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE))
+ return prev_cpu;
+
if (!mm || p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return prev_cpu;
@@ -9569,7 +9582,7 @@ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
- if (p->mm && p->mm->pcpu_sched) {
+ if (sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) && p->mm && p->mm->pcpu_sched) {
/*
* XXX things like Skylake have non-inclusive L3 and might not
* like this L3 centric view. What to do about L2 stickyness ?
@@ -9647,7 +9660,9 @@ static long migrate_degrades_locality(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
}
#else
-static long __migrate_degrades_locality(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dst_cpu, bool idle)
+static __maybe_unused long __migrate_degrades_locality(struct task_struct *p,
+ int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
+ bool idle)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index 3c12d9f93331..d2af7bfd36bf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true)
*/
SCHED_FEAT(SIS_UTIL, true)
+SCHED_FEAT(SCHED_CACHE, true)
/*
* Issue a WARN when we do multiple update_rq_clock() calls
* in a single rq->lock section. Default disabled because the
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 839463027ab0..f4ab45ecca86 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1174,7 +1174,7 @@ struct rq {
u64 clock_idle_copy;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
- raw_spinlock_t cpu_epoch_lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t cpu_epoch_lock ____cacheline_aligned;
u64 cpu_runtime;
unsigned long cpu_epoch;
unsigned long cpu_epoch_next;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-09 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-09 4:57 [RFC PATCH v4 00/28] Cache aware load-balancing Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/28] sched: " Chen Yu
2025-08-12 1:30 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-12 3:26 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:01 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2025-08-09 5:01 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/28] sched: Avoid task migration within its preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/28] sched: Avoid calculating the cpumask if the system is overloaded Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/28] sched: Add hysteresis to switch a task's preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-09-29 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30 4:31 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/28] sched: Save the per LLC utilization for better cache aware scheduling Chen Yu
2025-09-29 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30 4:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/28] sched: Add helper function to decide whether to allow " Chen Yu
2025-10-01 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 11:31 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-02 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 12:51 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-02 17:46 ` Tim Chen
2025-08-09 5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/28] sched: Set up LLC indexing Chen Yu
2025-09-26 6:14 ` Adam Li
2025-09-26 13:51 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-29 10:43 ` Adam Li
2025-09-30 2:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/28] sched: Introduce task preferred LLC field Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/28] sched: Calculate the number of tasks that have LLC preference on a runqueue Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/28] sched: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/28] sched: Calculate the total number of preferred LLC tasks during load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/28] sched: Tag the sched group as llc_balance if it has tasks prefer other LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/28] sched: Introduce update_llc_busiest() to deal with groups having preferred LLC tasks Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/28] sched: Introduce a new migration_type to track the preferred LLC load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/28] sched: Consider LLC locality for active balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/28] sched: Consider LLC preference when picking tasks from busiest queue Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/28] sched: Do not migrate task if it is moving out of its preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/28] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_LB to control cache aware load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/28] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_WAKE to control LLC aggregation on wake up Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/28] sched: Introduce a static key to enable cache aware only for multi LLCs Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/28] sched: Turn EPOCH_PERIOD and EPOCH_OLD into tunnable debugfs Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/28] sched: Scan a task's preferred node for preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-12 1:59 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-12 3:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/28] sched: Record average number of runninhg tasks per process Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/28] sched: Skip cache aware scheduling if the process has many active threads Chen Yu
2025-09-02 3:52 ` Tingyin Duan
2025-09-02 5:16 ` Tingyin Duan
2025-09-02 6:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-02 7:56 ` Duan Tingyin
2025-08-09 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/28] sched: Do not enable cache aware scheduling for process with large RSS Chen Yu
2025-09-26 8:48 ` Adam Li
2025-09-26 14:30 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09 5:09 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/28] sched: Allow the user space to tune the scale factor for RSS comparison Chen Yu
2025-08-09 5:09 ` [RFC PATCH v4 28/28] sched: Add ftrace to track cache aware load balance and hottest CPU changes Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84ceaca0a1de853284b4fc9888af806b03cde8bb.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®