mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
	Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
	Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
	Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
	Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 21/28] sched: Introduce a static key to enable cache aware only for multi LLCs
Date: Sat,  9 Aug 2025 13:07:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa45f8eb38ab06d02847d57195c6304af3107c70.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

If there are more than one LLCs in the node, the
cache aware scheduling is enabled. Otherwise, the
cache aware scheduling is disabled.

The definition of multiple LLCs in a node is that
every node in the system should have more than one
LLC. For example, if node0, node1, and node2 each
have 4 LLCs, while node3 has 1 LLC (possibly due
to CPU hotplug), cache-aware scheduling should be
disabled.

Suggested-by: Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>
Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c     | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
 kernel/sched/topology.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6e61f9e1f628..194ec594561b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1175,6 +1175,8 @@ static s64 update_curr_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
 #define EPOCH_PERIOD	(HZ/100)	/* 10 ms */
 #define EPOCH_OLD	5		/* 50 ms */
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cache_present);
+
 static int llc_id(int cpu)
 {
 	if (cpu < 0)
@@ -1318,7 +1320,8 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
 	unsigned long epoch;
 	int mm_sched_llc = -1;
 
-	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE))
+	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) ||
+	    !static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present))
 		return;
 
 	if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
@@ -1366,7 +1369,8 @@ static void task_tick_cache(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	struct callback_head *work = &p->cache_work;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
 
-	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE))
+	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) ||
+	    !static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present))
 		return;
 
 	if (!mm || !mm->pcpu_sched)
@@ -9063,7 +9067,8 @@ static int select_cache_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 	struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
 	int cpu;
 
-	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_WAKE))
+	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_WAKE) ||
+	    !static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present))
 		return prev_cpu;
 
 	if (!mm || p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
@@ -10024,6 +10029,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
 	if (sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) && sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB) &&
+	   static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present) &&
 	    get_migrate_hint(env->src_cpu, env->dst_cpu, p) == mig_forbid)
 		return 0;
 #endif
@@ -10109,7 +10115,8 @@ static struct list_head
 	LIST_HEAD(no_pref_llc);
 	LIST_HEAD(pref_other_llc);
 
-	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB))
+	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB) ||
+	    !static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present))
 		return tasks;
 
 	if (cpus_share_cache(env->dst_cpu, env->src_cpu))
@@ -10295,6 +10302,7 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
 		 * they are tasks that prefer the current LLC.
 		 */
 		if (sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) && sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB) &&
+		    static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present) &&
 		    p->preferred_llc != -1 &&
 		    llc_id(env->src_cpu) == p->preferred_llc)
 			break;
@@ -10952,7 +10960,8 @@ static inline bool llc_balance(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
 	struct sched_domain *child = env->sd->child;
 	int llc;
 
-	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB))
+	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB) ||
+	    !static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present))
 		return false;
 
 	if (env->sd->flags & SD_SHARE_LLC)
@@ -11064,7 +11073,8 @@ static void update_sg_if_llc(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
 	struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share;
 
 	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE ||
-	    !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB))
+	    !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB) ||
+	    !static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present))
 		return;
 
 	/* only care the sched domain that spans 1 LLC */
@@ -11126,7 +11136,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
 			*sg_overutilized = 1;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
-		if (sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) && sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB)) {
+		if (sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) && sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB) &&
+		    static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present)) {
 			int j;
 
 			for (j = 0; j < max_llcs; ++j)
@@ -12412,7 +12423,8 @@ imbalanced_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
 static inline bool
 break_llc_locality(struct lb_env *env)
 {
-	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB))
+	if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB) ||
+	    !static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (cpus_share_cache(env->src_cpu, env->dst_cpu))
@@ -12914,7 +12926,8 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
 		int llc = llc_idx(target_cpu);
 
-		if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB))
+		if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) || !sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE_LB) ||
+		    !static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_present))
 			goto out_unlock;
 
 		if (llc < 0)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 4464b92767ad..3e60618a88e9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2857,6 +2857,7 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
 extern unsigned int sysctl_llc_aggr_cap;
 extern unsigned int sysctl_llc_aggr_imb;
+extern struct static_key_false sched_cache_present;
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 91a2b7f65fee..8483c02b4d28 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -2476,6 +2476,8 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
 	int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
 	bool has_asym = false;
 	bool has_cluster = false;
+	bool llc_has_parent_sd = false;
+	unsigned int multi_llcs_node = 1;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
 	if (max_llcs < 0) {
@@ -2545,6 +2547,8 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
 				struct sched_domain __rcu *top_p;
 				unsigned int nr_llcs;
 
+				if (!llc_has_parent_sd)
+					llc_has_parent_sd = true;
 				/*
 				 * For a single LLC per node, allow an
 				 * imbalance up to 12.5% of the node. This is
@@ -2566,10 +2570,19 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
 				 * between LLCs and memory channels.
 				 */
 				nr_llcs = sd->span_weight / child->span_weight;
-				if (nr_llcs == 1)
+				/*
+				 * iff all nodes have multiple LLCs, the
+				 * multi_llcs_node will be set to 1. If
+				 * there is at least 1 node having 1 single
+				 * LLC, the multi_llcs_node remains 0.
+				 */
+				if (nr_llcs == 1) {
 					imb = sd->span_weight >> 3;
-				else
+					multi_llcs_node = 0;
+				} else {
 					imb = nr_llcs;
+					multi_llcs_node &= 1;
+				}
 				imb = max(1U, imb);
 				sd->imb_numa_nr = imb;
 
@@ -2617,6 +2630,11 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
 	if (has_cluster)
 		static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_cluster_active);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
+	if (llc_has_parent_sd && multi_llcs_node && !sched_asym_cpucap_active())
+		static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_cache_present);
+#endif
+
 	if (rq && sched_debug_verbose)
 		pr_info("root domain span: %*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map));
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-09  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-09  4:57 [RFC PATCH v4 00/28] Cache aware load-balancing Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/28] sched: " Chen Yu
2025-08-12  1:30   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-12  3:26     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:01 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/28] sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:01 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/28] sched: Avoid task migration within its preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/28] sched: Avoid calculating the cpumask if the system is overloaded Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/28] sched: Add hysteresis to switch a task's preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-09-29 13:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30  4:31     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/28] sched: Save the per LLC utilization for better cache aware scheduling Chen Yu
2025-09-29 14:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30  4:34     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/28] sched: Add helper function to decide whether to allow " Chen Yu
2025-10-01 13:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 11:31     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-02 11:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-02 12:51         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-02 17:46         ` Tim Chen
2025-08-09  5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/28] sched: Set up LLC indexing Chen Yu
2025-09-26  6:14   ` Adam Li
2025-09-26 13:51     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-29 10:43       ` Adam Li
2025-09-30  2:54         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/28] sched: Introduce task preferred LLC field Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/28] sched: Calculate the number of tasks that have LLC preference on a runqueue Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/28] sched: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:04 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/28] sched: Calculate the total number of preferred LLC tasks during load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/28] sched: Tag the sched group as llc_balance if it has tasks prefer other LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/28] sched: Introduce update_llc_busiest() to deal with groups having preferred LLC tasks Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/28] sched: Introduce a new migration_type to track the preferred LLC load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/28] sched: Consider LLC locality for active balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/28] sched: Consider LLC preference when picking tasks from busiest queue Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/28] sched: Do not migrate task if it is moving out of its preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/28] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_LB to control cache aware load balance Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/28] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_WAKE to control LLC aggregation on wake up Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:07 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2025-08-09  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/28] sched: Turn EPOCH_PERIOD and EPOCH_OLD into tunnable debugfs Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/28] sched: Scan a task's preferred node for preferred LLC Chen Yu
2025-08-12  1:59   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-12  3:36     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/28] sched: Record average number of runninhg tasks per process Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/28] sched: Skip cache aware scheduling if the process has many active threads Chen Yu
2025-09-02  3:52   ` Tingyin Duan
2025-09-02  5:16   ` Tingyin Duan
2025-09-02  6:14     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-02  7:56       ` Duan Tingyin
2025-08-09  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/28] sched: Do not enable cache aware scheduling for process with large RSS Chen Yu
2025-09-26  8:48   ` Adam Li
2025-09-26 14:30     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-09  5:09 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/28] sched: Allow the user space to tune the scale factor for RSS comparison Chen Yu
2025-08-09  5:09 ` [RFC PATCH v4 28/28] sched: Add ftrace to track cache aware load balance and hottest CPU changes Chen Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa45f8eb38ab06d02847d57195c6304af3107c70.1754712565.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
    --cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®