mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
	rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, treding@nvidia.com,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bbasu@nvidia.com, Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] cpufreq: tegra194: add Tegra264 support
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 14:26:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <904f7ac1-d488-4700-8839-ae981b04a71b@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104181521.3003578-1-sumitg@nvidia.com>

Hi Sumit,

On 11/5/2026 2:15 AM, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> This series adds cpufreq support for Tegra264, which joins the SoCs
> already supported by the tegra194-cpufreq driver.
> 
> Tegra264 keeps the existing model, where BPMP provides the NDIV limits.
> The driver derives the current frequency from the core clock and
> reference counters.
> 
> The main differences are:
>   - Frequency read: through system registers, as on Tegra194, but from
>     the 64-bit architected AMU counters. The reference counter ticks at
>     the system counter rate (CNTFRQ).
> 
>   - Frequency request: through MMIO, as on Tegra234. The driver writes
>     NDIV to a core_freq_req register in the CCPLEX register space. Each
>     register controls a cluster-clock unit shared by two single-CPU
>     clusters, so both CPUs form one cpufreq policy.
> 
> The patches fall into four groups:
>   - Fix (patch 1): read each CPU's MPIDR from a CPU-hotplug callback
>     instead of at probe. A CPU that is offline at probe then also gets
>     valid cluster and core IDs.
> 
>   - Preparation (patches 2 to 5): cleanups, mostly of the counter code,
>     to make room for a 64-bit counter and for an MMIO mapping without
>     ACTMON counters.
> 
>   - Improvement (patches 6 and 7): group CPUs by the generic
>     "performance-domains" property, which cluster-based grouping cannot
>     express on Tegra264. Device trees without it keep the existing
>     grouping.
> 
>   - Tegra264 support (patches 8 and 9): the driver support, followed by
>     the device tree changes it relies on.
> 
> Patch 9 depends on "arm64: tegra: Fix address translation on Tegra264"
> from Thierry's series [1]. Without it, the ccplex@30000000 node does not
> translate to the CCPLEX registers.
> 

I have some inline comments. Please take a look.

Sashiko also has some feedback that may be worth checking:

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261104181521.3003578-1-sumitg%40nvidia.com


P1 and P8 don't apply on v7.4-rc2 / linux-next due to 4dd10fbbeb9c
(devm_kmalloc_obj conversion). Could you rebase?


> 
> Sumit Gupta (9):
>    cpufreq: tegra194: move MPIDR read to CPU hotplug callback
>    cpufreq: tegra194: remove duplicate counter sampling loops
>    cpufreq: tegra194: add tegra_counter_delta helper
>    cpufreq: tegra194: add per-SoC counter mask
>    cpufreq: tegra194: split MMIO mapping from ACTMON offset
>    dt-bindings: arm: nvidia: Document the Tegra264 CCPLEX cluster
>    cpufreq: tegra194: derive frequency domain from device tree
>    cpufreq: tegra194: Add support for Tegra264
>    arm64: tegra: Add CCPLEX cluster node for Tegra264
> 
>   .../tegra/nvidia,tegra-ccplex-cluster.yaml    |  27 +-
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi      |  21 +
>   drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm                   |   4 +-
>   drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c            | 422 +++++++++++++-----
>   4 files changed, 357 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/20261030141101.845044-1-thierry.reding@kernel.org/
> 


-- 
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-04 18:15 Sumit Gupta
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] cpufreq: tegra194: move MPIDR read to CPU hotplug callback Sumit Gupta
2026-11-13  6:27   ` Zhongqiu Han
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/9] cpufreq: tegra194: remove duplicate counter sampling loops Sumit Gupta
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] cpufreq: tegra194: add tegra_counter_delta helper Sumit Gupta
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] cpufreq: tegra194: add per-SoC counter mask Sumit Gupta
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] cpufreq: tegra194: split MMIO mapping from ACTMON offset Sumit Gupta
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: arm: nvidia: Document the Tegra264 CCPLEX cluster Sumit Gupta
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] cpufreq: tegra194: derive frequency domain from device tree Sumit Gupta
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] cpufreq: tegra194: Add support for Tegra264 Sumit Gupta
2026-11-13  6:27   ` Zhongqiu Han
2026-11-04 18:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: tegra: Add CCPLEX cluster node " Sumit Gupta
2026-11-13  6:26 ` Zhongqiu Han [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=904f7ac1-d488-4700-8839-ae981b04a71b@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®