From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
arjan@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, karahmed@amazon.de,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] x86/msr: Add definitions for new speculation control MSRs
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 14:06:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae7102d6-4df8-63eb-2e1e-c7cee69fea9e@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516528149-9370-4-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
On 01/21/2018, 10:49 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Add MSR and bit definitions for SPEC_CTRL, PRED_CMD and ARCH_CAPABILITIES.
>
> See Intel's 336996-Speculative-Execution-Side-Channel-Mitigations.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index fa11fb1..3e50463 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,13 @@
> #define MSR_PPIN_CTL 0x0000004e
> #define MSR_PPIN 0x0000004f
>
> +#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048 /* Speculation Control */
> +#define SPEC_CTRL_IBRS (1 << 0) /* Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation */
> +#define SPEC_CTRL_STIBP (1 << 1) /* Single Thread Indirect Branch Predictors */
> +
> +#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049 /* Prediction Command */
> +#define PRED_CMD_IBPB (1 << 0) /* Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier */
> +
> #define MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0 0x000000c1
> #define MSR_IA32_PERFCTR1 0x000000c2
> #define MSR_FSB_FREQ 0x000000cd
> @@ -60,6 +67,10 @@
> #define MSR_IA32_BBL_CR_CTL 0x00000119
> #define MSR_IA32_BBL_CR_CTL3 0x0000011e
>
> +#define MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES 0x0000010a
> +#define ARCH_CAP_RDCL_NO (1 << 0) /* Not susceptible to Meltdown */
> +#define ARCH_CAP_IBRS_ALL (1 << 1) /* Enhanced IBRS support */
Is there any reason why all 3 are not properly sorted?
0x04e > 0x048
0x119 > 0x10a
> #define MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS 0x00000174
> #define MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP 0x00000175
> #define MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP 0x00000176
>
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-21 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-21 9:49 [PATCH v2 0/8] Speculation Control feature support, IBPB David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel feature bits for Speculation Control David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-21 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD feature bits for Prediction Command David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 17:50 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-21 18:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-22 14:31 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-22 14:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-21 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] x86/msr: Add definitions for new speculation control MSRs David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 13:06 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2018-01-21 13:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on fixed Intel processors David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 13:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] x86/speculation: Add basic support for IBPB David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-21 18:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 18:29 ` KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-21 19:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 19:31 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 19:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-21 20:04 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 20:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-21 21:25 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 19:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 18:54 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 19:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 19:31 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 19:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 20:07 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 20:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/kvm: Add IBPB support David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 18:06 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-21 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] x86/speculation: Use Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier in context switch David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] x86/mm: Only flush indirect branches when switching into non dumpable process David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae7102d6-4df8-63eb-2e1e-c7cee69fea9e@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®