From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 03/13] rcu-tasks: Add a Tasks RCU implementation for reader-marked trampolines
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 17:14:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqlgxKGk_AEKls_1@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915-b4-rcu-tasks-preempt-qs-v3-3-0ad30c4c5ee7@toxicpanda.com>
Le Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 01:17:30PM +0000, Josef Bacik a écrit :
> Tasks RCU waits for every task to pass through a voluntary context
> switch, usermode or idle, because a preempted task might be sitting in a
> trampoline that is about to be freed and nothing marks it as such. With
> PREEMPT_LAZY that is a poor fit for servers: cond_resched() is a no-op,
> so a CPU-bound kthread only ever leaves the CPU by preemption, and one
> such kthread holds every synchronize_rcu_tasks() caller -- ftrace and
> BPF trampoline teardown under their mutexes, the kprobe jump optimizer
> under text_mutex and cpus_read_lock() -- hostage for as long as it runs.
>
> Following the discussion on v2, take the other road: let the
> architecture make its trampolines Tasks Trace RCU readers. When an
> architecture selects HAVE_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS it promises that every
> trampoline whose lifetime Tasks RCU guards enters rcu_read_lock_trace()
> (or its assembly equivalent) before calling out and leaves it before
> returning, so a task anywhere inside such a call-out, preempted or not,
> is an ordinary Tasks Trace reader.
>
> That leaves the few instructions of trampoline text before the reader
> is entered and after it is left (plus, in a later patch, the bytes a
> kprobe jump optimization is about to overwrite). A task can only linger
> there by being interrupted there, and such text never calls anything
> that schedules, so instead of tracking tasks we track CPUs: every pass
> through __schedule() is a per-CPU quiescent event, except that the one
> context switch that can catch a task at an arbitrary instruction -- a
> preemption from irq exit -- first records the interrupted IP in the task
> and parks it on a per-CPU list for the duration (reusing the fields and
> lists the classic flavor keeps for its exit-path bookkeeping), and, if
> the IP is inside such "unmarked" text, puts the task on a short holdout
> list; the task takes itself off at its next context switch outside such
> a preemption or irq-exit check that finds it elsewhere. Usermode (the
> existing tick hook, or a nohz_full CPU in an RCU extended quiescent
> state) and idle count as well. rcu_tasks_trampoline_text() does the
> classification: anything outside core and module text, a new
> .text..rcu_tramp section for C glue that trampolines call before it has
> entered the reader (__rcu_trampoline), and an arch hook for things like
> static ftrace stubs and return thunks.
>
> The grace period, run by the existing rcu_tasks kthread so that
> call_rcu_tasks(), synchronize_rcu_tasks() and rcu_barrier_tasks() keep
> their names and callers, is: wait for every online non-idle CPU to
> context switch (nudging stragglers with resched_cpu() after a jiffy),
> drain the holdout list as it stood, synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace() for
> everything inside the readers, then one more CPU pass and drain for
> tasks that have since left the reader into the trailing instructions.
> That is bounded by a few jiffies, preempt-off latency and an SRCU grace
> period rather than by the longest stretch any task runs without
> sleeping, needs no per-task scan, and makes cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs()
> unnecessary on such architectures. As before, idle tasks are not
> waited for. rcu_tasks_wait_irq_preempted() walks the parked lists for
> the one caller (the kprobe jump optimizer, later in the series) that
> makes ordinary text unsafe to be parked in and so has to wait out tasks
> that were preempted there before it said so.
>
> The classic implementation is untouched and remains the default; the
> new one is built only as CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS when the
> architecture opts in and uses the generic irq entry code, whose
> reschedule check gains the rcu_tasks_irq_resched() call. Nothing
> selects it yet.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 11 +
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 32 ++-
> include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
> kernel/entry/common.c | 8 +-
> kernel/fork.c | 1 +
> kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 22 ++
> kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 460 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/rcu/update.c | 2 +
> 8 files changed, 528 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> index b2988aa12f66..86e58c4fe370 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> @@ -571,6 +571,16 @@
> __cpuidle_text_end = .; \
> __noinstr_text_end = .;
>
> +/*
> + * C glue called directly from Tasks-RCU-protected trampolines, bounded so
> + * that rcu_tasks_trampoline_text() can recognise it; see __rcu_trampoline.
> + */
> +#define RCU_TRAMP_TEXT \
> + ALIGN_FUNCTION(); \
> + __rcu_tramp_text_start = .; \
> + *(.text..rcu_tramp) \
> + __rcu_tramp_text_end = .;
> +
> #define TEXT_SPLIT \
> __split_text_start = .; \
> *(.text.split .text.split.[0-9a-zA-Z_]*) \
> @@ -607,6 +617,7 @@
> TEXT_HOT \
> *(TEXT_MAIN .text.fixup) \
> NOINSTR_TEXT \
> + RCU_TRAMP_TEXT \
> *(.ref.text)
>
> /* sched.text is aling to function alignment to secure we have same
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 44c07a66edff..fb2a3889a696 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,31 @@ token_context_lock_instance(RCU, RCU_BH);
> /* Exported common interfaces */
> void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
> void rcu_barrier_tasks(void);
> +
> +/*
> + * Trampoline-reader Tasks RCU (CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS), see
> + * kernel/rcu/tasks.h. rcu_tasks_irq_resched_enter()/_exit() bracket the
> + * irq-exit preemption; rcu_tasks_trampoline_text() and the arch_ override
> + * classify an interrupted IP; rcu_tasks_wait_irq_preempted() lets a caller
> + * wait out tasks already preempted somewhere it is about to make unsafe.
> + * __rcu_trampoline places C code that such trampolines call directly, before
> + * it has entered its Tasks Trace reader, where that classification can see it.
> + */
> +void rcu_tasks_irq_resched_enter(unsigned long ip);
> +void rcu_tasks_irq_resched_exit(void);
> +bool rcu_tasks_trampoline_text(unsigned long ip);
> +bool arch_rcu_tasks_trampoline_text(unsigned long ip);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS
> +void rcu_tasks_wait_irq_preempted(bool (*inside)(unsigned long ip));
> +#else
> +static inline void rcu_tasks_wait_irq_preempted(bool (*inside)(unsigned long ip)) { }
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS
> +/* Also keeps instrumentation calls out of the prologue, ahead of the reader. */
> +#define __rcu_trampoline __noinstr_section(".text..rcu_tramp")
> +#else
> +#define __rcu_trampoline
> +#endif
> void synchronize_rcu(void);
>
> /*
> @@ -180,11 +205,16 @@ static inline void rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup(void) { }
> #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC
>
> # ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> -# define rcu_tasks_classic_qs(t, preempt) \
> +# ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS
> +void rcu_tasks_note_qs(struct task_struct *t, bool preempt);
> +# define rcu_tasks_classic_qs(t, preempt) rcu_tasks_note_qs((t), (preempt))
> +# else
> +# define rcu_tasks_classic_qs(t, preempt) \
> do { \
> if (!(preempt) && READ_ONCE((t)->rcu_tasks_holdout)) \
> WRITE_ONCE((t)->rcu_tasks_holdout, false); \
> } while (0)
> +# endif
> void call_rcu_tasks(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
> void synchronize_rcu_tasks(void);
> void rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print(char *tt, char *tf);
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 8b3d47a325cc..15beb44caa2c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -957,6 +957,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> u8 rcu_tasks_holdout;
> u8 rcu_tasks_idx;
> int rcu_tasks_idle_cpu;
> + unsigned long rcu_tasks_irq_ip;
> struct list_head rcu_tasks_holdout_list;
> int rcu_tasks_exit_cpu;
> struct list_head rcu_tasks_exit_list;
> diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> index e4acd50bd81a..94318519998c 100644
> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> #include <linux/kmsan.h>
> #include <linux/livepatch.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> #include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
> #include <linux/tick.h>
>
> @@ -141,8 +142,13 @@ void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(struct pt_regs *regs)
> rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt();
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY))
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack());
> - if (need_resched() && arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched())
> + if (need_resched() && arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched()) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS))
> + rcu_tasks_irq_resched_enter(instruction_pointer(regs));
> preempt_schedule_irq();
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS))
> + rcu_tasks_irq_resched_exit();
> + }
> }
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 416758c8a3d4..8077336bb136 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1871,6 +1871,7 @@ static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
> p->rcu_tasks_holdout = false;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_tasks_holdout_list);
> p->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu = -1;
> + p->rcu_tasks_irq_ip = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_tasks_exit_list);
> #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
> #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> index 332df7a7a634..bbab14bc14c3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> @@ -107,6 +107,28 @@ config TASKS_RCU
> default NEED_TASKS_RCU && PREEMPTION
> select IRQ_WORK
>
> +config HAVE_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS
> + bool
> + help
> + Select this if the architecture uses the generic irq entry code and
> + every trampoline whose lifetime Tasks RCU guards on it (ftrace
> + trampolines, kprobe out-of-line and optimized-probe slots, BPF
> + trampolines, out-of-line ftrace direct-call trampolines) enters a
> + Tasks Trace RCU read-side critical section before calling out of
> + the trampoline and leaves it before returning, and any core text
> + that runs on behalf of such a trampoline outside that reader is
> + reported by arch_rcu_tasks_trampoline_text(). The assembly readers
> + use the this_cpu_inc() form of SRCU-fast, hence !NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE.
> +
> +config TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS
> + def_bool TASKS_RCU && HAVE_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS && GENERIC_IRQ_ENTRY && !NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
> + select TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> + help
> + Implement the Tasks RCU grace period as a per-CPU pass over
> + context switches and irq-exit reschedules outside trampoline text
> + plus a Tasks Trace RCU grace period, instead of waiting for every
> + task to voluntarily context switch. See kernel/rcu/tasks.h.
> +
> config FORCE_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> bool "Force selection of Tasks Rude RCU"
> depends on RCU_EXPERT
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index 627295396cd9..3a7c092361a6 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct rcu_tasks rt_name = \
> .kname = #rt_name, \
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && !defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS)
>
> /* Report delay of scan exiting tasklist in rcu_tasks_postscan(). */
> static void tasks_rcu_exit_stall(struct timer_list *unused);
> @@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ static void rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, char *t
>
> #endif // #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && !defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS)
>
> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> //
> @@ -897,10 +897,445 @@ static void rcu_tasks_wait_gp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> rtp->postgp_func(rtp);
> }
>
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) */
> +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && !defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS) */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
>
> +static int rcu_tasks_lazy_ms = -1;
> +module_param(rcu_tasks_lazy_ms, int, 0444);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS
> +
> +////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> +//
> +// Tasks RCU for architectures whose trampolines are Tasks Trace RCU
> +// readers (CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS).
> +//
> +// On these architectures every piece of text whose lifetime Tasks RCU
> +// guards -- ftrace trampolines, kprobe optinsn slots, BPF trampoline
> +// images, out-of-line ftrace direct-call trampolines -- enters a Tasks
> +// Trace RCU read-side critical section before calling out of itself and
> +// leaves it before returning, so a task anywhere inside such a call-out,
> +// preempted or not, is an ordinary rcu_read_lock_trace() reader and
> +// synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace() waits for it.
> +//
> +// What that cannot cover is the handful of instructions in the trampoline
> +// before the reader is entered and after it is left, and the one user that
> +// has no trampoline at all: the bytes after a kprobe that the jump
> +// optimizer is about to overwrite. A task can only linger in such
> +// "unmarked" text by being interrupted there; unmarked text never calls
> +// anything that could schedule. So a context switch on a CPU tells us that
> +// whatever that CPU was running is out of unmarked text, with one
> +// exception: a preemption from the irq-exit path, which can happen at any
> +// instruction boundary. That path has the interrupted pt_regs in hand, so
> +// just before it preempts it records the IP in the task and checks it
> +// (rcu_tasks_trampoline_text()); if it is inside unmarked text the task
> +// goes on a short holdout list first, and takes itself off again at its
> +// next context switch outside such a preemption or its next irq-exit
> +// check that finds it elsewhere. With that, every pass through
> +// __schedule() is a per-CPU quiescent event, as are usermode and idle.
> +//
> +// A grace period is then:
> +//
> +// 1. Wait for every online, non-idle CPU to context switch, nudging
> +// stragglers with resched_cpu(). Afterwards no task is in the leading
> +// unmarked instructions of a dying trampoline unless it is on the
> +// holdout list.
> +// 2. Wait for the holdout list (as it stood) to drain.
> +// 3. synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace(), for everything inside the readers.
> +// 4. Repeat 1 and 2 for tasks that have since left the reader and are in
> +// the trailing unmarked instructions.
Alternatively the approach could be generalized to vanilla RCU, it could be
possible to define a .text.rcu_no_qs section within which code running is
considered as an RCU reader (with a pause while on the explicit RCU tasks
section). It would be forbidden to voluntary sleep inside
and to put explicit preemption points (CONFIG_PROVE_RCU could report misuses).
Based on IP, RCU could consider those interrupted section as readers. This would
require PREEMPT_RCU though.
And then synchronize_rcu() would do the 1, 2, 4 jobs.
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 13:17 [PATCH RFC v3 00/13] rcu-tasks: build Tasks RCU on Tasks Trace readers in trampolines Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/13] entry: Pass pt_regs to irqentry_exit_cond_resched() Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/13] rcu-tasks-trace: Inline rcu_read_lock_trace() and annotate inside the reader Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/13] rcu-tasks: Add a Tasks RCU implementation for reader-marked trampolines Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 15:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2026-09-15 23:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-16 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-09-16 14:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-16 14:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-09-16 14:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-09-16 14:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-16 15:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-09-16 15:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/13] kprobes: Expose the optprobe jump window to Tasks RCU Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/13] ftrace: Mark modules hosting direct-call trampolines for " Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/13] bpf: Take a Tasks Trace reader in the trampoline glue Josef Bacik
2026-09-16 3:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/13] x86/ftrace: Take a Tasks Trace reader around ftrace_caller's call-out Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/13] x86/kprobes: Take a Tasks Trace reader in the optprobe template Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/13] arm64: ftrace: Take a Tasks Trace reader around ftrace_caller's call-out Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/13] samples: ftrace: Make the direct-call trampolines Tasks Trace readers Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/13] rcutorture: Make Tasks RCU readers Tasks Trace readers where required Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/13] rcu-tasks-trace: Assert no reader is held on return to userspace Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/13] x86, arm64: Build Tasks RCU on Tasks Trace readers in trampolines Josef Bacik
2026-09-15 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqlgxKGk_AEKls_1@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®