From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: "Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
"Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>, "Paul Jackson" <pj@sgi.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:53:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0807111653g85aecaeqcfbdb4dec153b3d4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4877EA9A.1070700@qualcomm.com>
2008/7/12 Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>:
> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>>
>> Does the patch below help?
>>
>> (non-white-space-damaged version is attached)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> index 9fceb97..ae61dc9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> @@ -1912,11 +1912,21 @@ static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(void)
>> static int cpuset_handle_cpuhp(struct notifier_block *unused_nb,
>> unsigned long phase, void *unused_cpu)
>> {
>> - if (phase == CPU_DYING || phase == CPU_DYING_FROZEN)
>> + swicth (phase) {
>> + case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
>> + case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
>> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
>> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
>> + case CPU_ONLINE:
>> + case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
>> + case CPU_DEAD:
>> + case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
>> + common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug();
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> I was always wondering why we're running that logic for every hotplug event.
> For example, do we care for UP_CANCELED* and DOWN_FAILED* ? Presumably
> nothing should've changed, no ?
I guess, it's to revert the effect of CPU_{DOWN | UP}_PREPARE.
e.g. CPU_DOWN_PREPARE detaches/destroys sched-domains... so if a
cpu-down op. fails, we restore them to their inital state.
> btw I'm just going by the name of the event. So UP_CANCELED to me sounds
> like CPU never got to the ONLINE stage and cpuset should not really care.
Yes, if it has not done anything for UP_PREPARE (and no one else on
behave of it).
>
> Max
>
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-11 19:07 Vegard Nossum
2008-07-11 19:36 ` Paul Menage
2008-07-11 19:43 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-11 20:07 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11 23:03 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-11 23:19 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11 23:53 ` Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-07-12 3:17 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-12 3:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 10:00 ` Miao Xie
2008-07-12 11:05 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 10:04 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 19:19 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-12 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 22:43 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-12 23:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:00 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-12 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:19 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 23:25 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 23:05 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 23:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 9:53 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 17:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-13 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 18:13 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-13 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:25 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-13 15:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-14 15:49 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-14 22:38 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-14 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 0:00 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-15 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 2:21 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-15 3:03 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15 4:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15 8:42 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15 9:12 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-16 6:35 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-16 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 17:01 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15 3:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 3:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 3:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 4:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 4:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-12 10:45 Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 11:14 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 0:10 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 8:50 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-13 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b647ffbd0807111653g85aecaeqcfbdb4dec153b3d4@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome