From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
"Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>,
"Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
"Paul Jackson" <pj@sgi.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:25:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0807121625n2a9ffc16rd17d2b393ef8506e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b647ffbd0807121619r15c2864fw5b0ff592ba8edbd2@mail.gmail.com>
2008/7/13 Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>:
> 2008/7/13 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>:
>>
>>> (A little pet horse for the occasion: Testing can show the presence of
>>> errors, but not their absence. But that's a different story.)
>>
>> Absolutely. Which is actually why I prefer my patch. I think it fixes - in
>> general - the issue of CPU migration migrating tasks back to the CPU that
>> we're taking down.
>>
>> The other patches seem to work around just the problem that _triggers_ the
>> bug. They don't actually make it impossible to migrate to a CPU that is
>> getting shut down - they just try to avoid the particular sequence that
>> made it happen for you.
>
> Well, they try to make sched-domains consistent for all possible
> cases, not just any particular case. So no, they don't allow a
> possibility to leave tasks on a dead CPU (unless there is another
> bug).
>
> With your patch (and a cpusets :: hotplug handler from the current
> -git) sched-domains are still broken and they are used in a number of
> places. So why keep them at all?
>
> I'm really surprised that Vegard says this "cpu_active_map" patch
> alone fixes the problem.
>
> With your modifications of common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug() - yes
No, not even with your modifications of common_mem_hotplug_unplug().
- if (phase == CPU_DYING || phase == CPU_DYING_FROZEN)
+ if (phase == CPU_DYING || phase == CPU_DYING_FROZEN ||
+ phase == CPU_UP_PREPARE || phase == CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
You should have added "phase == CPU_DOWN_PREPARE || phase ==
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN" additionally. So I'm really surprised by
Vegard's assertion :-)
but
> then it will work even without "cpu_active_map".
>
> (ok, unless I'm really blind at this late hour so please direct me to
> the right way :-)
>
>
>>
>> Linus
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Dmitry Adamushko
>
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-12 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-11 19:07 Vegard Nossum
2008-07-11 19:36 ` Paul Menage
2008-07-11 19:43 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-11 20:07 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11 23:03 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-11 23:19 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11 23:53 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 3:17 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-12 3:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 10:00 ` Miao Xie
2008-07-12 11:05 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 10:04 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 19:19 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-12 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 22:43 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-12 23:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:00 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-12 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:19 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 23:25 ` Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-07-12 23:05 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 23:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 9:53 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 17:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-13 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 18:13 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-13 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:25 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-13 15:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-14 15:49 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-14 22:38 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-14 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 0:00 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-15 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 2:21 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-15 3:03 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15 4:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15 8:42 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15 9:12 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-16 6:35 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-16 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 17:01 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15 3:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 3:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 3:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 4:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 4:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-12 10:45 Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 11:14 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 0:10 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 8:50 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-13 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b647ffbd0807121625n2a9ffc16rd17d2b393ef8506e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome