mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
	Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
	Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
	Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
	Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
	Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 11:24:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00da49fd590b95baad0525660bda4c0ba178243d.1760206683.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1760206683.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>

Prateek and Tingyin reported that memory-intensive workloads (such as
stream) can saturate memory bandwidth and caches on the preferred LLC
when sched_cache aggregates too many threads.

To mitigate this, estimate a process's memory footprint by comparing
its RSS (anonymous and shared pages) to the size of the LLC. If RSS
exceeds the LLC size, skip cache-aware scheduling.

Note that RSS is only an approximation of the memory footprint.
By default, the comparison is strict, but a later patch will allow
users to provide a hint to adjust this threshold.

According to the test from Adam, some systems do not have shared L3
but with shared L2 as clusters. In this case, the L2 becomes the LLC[1].

Link[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3cb6ebc7-a2fd-42b3-8739-b00e28a09cb6@os.amperecomputing.com/

Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 21 ++++++++++------
 kernel/sched/fair.c       | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
index c8f4f0a0b874..82d0d59ca0e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
+++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
@@ -113,18 +113,11 @@ int acpi_get_cache_info(unsigned int cpu,
 
 const struct attribute_group *cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf);
 
-/*
- * Get the cacheinfo structure for the cache associated with @cpu at
- * level @level.
- * cpuhp lock must be held.
- */
-static inline struct cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(int cpu, int level)
+static inline struct cacheinfo *_get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(int cpu, int level)
 {
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
 	int i;
 
-	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
-
 	for (i = 0; i < ci->num_leaves; i++) {
 		if (ci->info_list[i].level == level) {
 			if (ci->info_list[i].attributes & CACHE_ID)
@@ -136,6 +129,18 @@ static inline struct cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(int cpu, int level)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Get the cacheinfo structure for the cache associated with @cpu at
+ * level @level.
+ * cpuhp lock must be held.
+ */
+static inline struct cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(int cpu, int level)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
+	return _get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(cpu, level);
+}
+
 /*
  * Get the id of the cache associated with @cpu at level @level.
  * cpuhp lock must be held.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6b8eace79eee..46dfcd2a01b3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1240,6 +1240,38 @@ static inline int pref_llc_idx(struct task_struct *p)
 	return llc_idx(p->preferred_llc);
 }
 
+static bool exceed_llc_capacity(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu)
+{
+	struct cacheinfo *ci;
+	unsigned long rss;
+	unsigned int llc;
+
+	/*
+	 * get_cpu_cacheinfo_level() can not be used
+	 * because it requires the cpu_hotplug_lock
+	 * to be held. Use _get_cpu_cacheinfo_level()
+	 * directly because the 'cpu' can not be
+	 * offlined at the moment.
+	 */
+	ci = _get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(cpu, 3);
+	if (!ci) {
+		/*
+		 * On system without L3 but with shared L2,
+		 * L2 becomes the LLC.
+		 */
+		ci = _get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(cpu, 2);
+		if (!ci)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	llc = ci->size;
+
+	rss = get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES) +
+		get_mm_counter(mm, MM_SHMEMPAGES);
+
+	return (llc <= (rss * PAGE_SIZE));
+}
+
 static bool exceed_llc_nr(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu)
 {
 	int smt_nr = 1;
@@ -1402,7 +1434,8 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
 	 */
 	if (epoch - READ_ONCE(mm->mm_sched_epoch) > EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT ||
 	    get_nr_threads(p) <= 1 ||
-	    exceed_llc_nr(mm, cpu_of(rq))) {
+	    exceed_llc_nr(mm, cpu_of(rq)) ||
+	    exceed_llc_capacity(mm, cpu_of(rq))) {
 		if (mm->mm_sched_cpu != -1)
 			mm->mm_sched_cpu = -1;
 	}
@@ -1486,6 +1519,14 @@ static void __no_profile task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Do not check exceed_llc_nr() because
+	 * the active number of threads needs to
+	 * been updated anyway.
+	 */
+	if (exceed_llc_capacity(mm, curr_cpu))
+		return;
+
 	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
 		return;
 
@@ -9845,8 +9886,12 @@ static enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc_task(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
 	if (cpu < 0 || cpus_share_cache(src_cpu, dst_cpu))
 		return mig_unrestricted;
 
-	 /* skip cache aware load balance for single/too many threads */
-	if (get_nr_threads(p) <= 1 || exceed_llc_nr(mm, dst_cpu))
+	/*
+	 * skip cache aware load balance for single/too many threads
+	 * or large footprint.
+	 */
+	if (get_nr_threads(p) <= 1 || exceed_llc_nr(mm, dst_cpu) ||
+	    exceed_llc_capacity(mm, dst_cpu))
 		return mig_unrestricted;
 
 	if (cpus_share_cache(dst_cpu, cpu))
-- 
2.32.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-11 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-11 18:24 [PATCH 00/19] Cache Aware Scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched/fair: Add infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-14 19:12   ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-15  4:54     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 19:32       ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16  3:11         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 11:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:07       ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-23  7:26   ` kernel test robot
2025-10-27  4:47   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 13:35     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 02/19] sched/fair: Record per-LLC utilization to guide cache-aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2025-10-15 10:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:27     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27  5:01   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 14:07     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28  2:50       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 03/19] sched/fair: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 04/19] sched/fair: Introduce a static key to enable cache aware only for multi LLCs Tim Chen
2025-10-15 11:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:25     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 16:36       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-10-15 17:01         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-16  7:42           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-17  2:08             ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-16  7:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-27  5:42   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 12:56     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27 23:36       ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29 12:36         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28  2:46       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 05/19] sched/fair: Add LLC index mapping for CPUs Tim Chen
2025-10-15 11:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 11:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:12     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 06/19] sched/fair: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2025-10-14  5:16   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 11:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-16  3:13       ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-17  4:50       ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-20  9:41         ` Vern Hao
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 07/19] sched/fair: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:03     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16  7:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-16 20:06         ` Tim Chen
2025-10-27  6:04   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 15:15     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 15:46       ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29  4:32         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29 12:48           ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29  4:00       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 17:06     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 08/19] sched/fair: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:41     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16  7:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-21  8:28       ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-23  6:07         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 09/19] sched/fair: Count tasks prefering each LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:42     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:43     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-27  8:33   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 23:19     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 10/19] sched/fair: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-15  7:23   ` kernel test robot
2025-10-15 15:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 21:28     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15 15:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:03     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-24  9:32   ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-27  2:00     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29  9:51       ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-29 13:19         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27  6:29   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 12:11     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 11/19] sched/fair: Identify busiest sched_group for LLC-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-15 15:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 21:18     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 12/19] sched/fair: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-27  9:04   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 22:59     ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 13/19] sched/fair: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 14/19] sched/fair: Consider LLC preference when selecting tasks for load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 15/19] sched/fair: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2025-10-28  6:02   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 11:58     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 15:30       ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29  4:15         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29  3:54       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29 14:23         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29 21:09         ` Tim Chen
2025-10-30  4:19           ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-30 20:07             ` Tim Chen
2025-10-31  3:32               ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-31 15:17                 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-11-03 21:41                   ` Tim Chen
2025-11-03 22:07                 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Exclude processes with many threads from cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-23  7:22   ` kernel test robot
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 17/19] sched/fair: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2025-10-22 17:21   ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-23  6:55     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2025-10-15  6:57   ` [PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes kernel test robot
2025-10-16  4:44     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 19/19] sched/fair: Add user control to adjust the tolerance of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-29  8:07   ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-29 12:54     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-14 12:13 ` [PATCH 00/19] Cache Aware Scheduling Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-14 21:48   ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15  5:38     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 18:26       ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-16  4:57         ` Chen, Yu C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00da49fd590b95baad0525660bda4c0ba178243d.1760206683.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
    --cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®