From: Anisa Su <anisa.su887@gmail.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Anisa Su <anisa.su887@gmail.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
John Groves <John@groves.net>, Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 14/31] cxl/extent: Handle DC Add Capacity events
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 20:48:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aijefzv5pa40BIdB@AnisaLaptop.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7f665f7-7423-4279-92ad-e1f8f87b1e7e@intel.com>
On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 12:06:56PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 5/23/26 2:43 AM, Anisa Su wrote:
> > Replace the empty-response stub in handle_add_event() with the real
> > add pipeline.
> >
> > DC Event Records can be grouped together with the 'More' flag. The
> > previous commit completed the set up for holding onto extents in
> > the pending list until receiving the last event record of the group,
> > marked by 'More'=0.
> >
> > This commit fills in the logic for processing the pending list and
> > adds basic validation for extents before they are added to the
> > device model as a child of the cxlr_dax region. More complete
> > checks for tags/sequence numbers/alignment is added in subsequent commits.
> >
> > For each tag that appears in the pending list:
> > 1. Extract all extents in the pending list with that tag to a
> > local list.
> >
> > 2. The spec requires that shareable extents are ordered by
> > shared extent sequence number, which "instructs each host
> > on the relative order these extents must be placed in adjacent
> > virtual address space" (r4.0 Section 9.13.3 Figure 9-23
> > Shared Extent List Example). Otherwise, retain arrival order.
> >
> > Thus the tag group is stable-sorted by shared_extn_seq; for non-sharable
> > extents every key is 0 and the stable sort preserves arrival
> > order.
> >
> > Individual extents are checked for the following:
> > 1. The extent's DPA range fully resolves to an endpoint decoder.
> >
> > 2. Doesn't overlap with a previously accepted extent.
> >
> > 3. Sequence number doesn't collide with others in the same
> > tag group
> >
> > Upon passing these checks, extents are "onlined" together
> > as a tag group:
> > online_tag_group() registers a struct device per
> > dc_extent under cxlr_dax->dev so the dax layer can discover them
> > via device_for_each_child().
> >
> > Once the pending list has been fully processed, send the
> > DC_ADD_RESPONSE.
> >
> > Based on an original patch by Navneet Singh.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anisa Su <anisa.su@samsung.com>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes:
> > [anisa: restructured from the original "Process dynamic partition
> > events" monolith; this commit fills in the Add path on top of the
> > previous commit's stubs. Further validation lands in subsequent
> > commits.]
> > ---
> > drivers/cxl/core/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/cxl/core/core.h | 13 ++
> > drivers/cxl/core/extent.c | 372 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 123 ++++++++++-
> > drivers/cxl/core/region_dax.c | 3 +
> > drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 19 ++
> > tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild | 5 +-
> > 7 files changed, 528 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/core/extent.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile b/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> > index ce7213818d3c..208917ad8aac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ cxl_core-y += hdm.o
> > cxl_core-y += pmu.o
> > cxl_core-y += cdat.o
> > cxl_core-$(CONFIG_TRACING) += trace.o
> > -cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_REGION) += region.o region_pmem.o region_dax.o
> > +cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_REGION) += region.o region_pmem.o region_dax.o extent.o
> > cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_MCE) += mce.o
> > cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_FEATURES) += features.o
> > cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_EDAC_MEM_FEATURES) += edac.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> > index 14723cfd05f0..1bae80dbf991 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> > @@ -65,12 +65,24 @@ u64 cxl_dpa_to_hpa(struct cxl_region *cxlr, const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> > int devm_cxl_add_dax_region(struct cxl_region *cxlr);
> > int devm_cxl_add_pmem_region(struct cxl_region *cxlr);
> >
> > +int cxl_add_extent(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, struct cxl_extent *extent,
> > + u16 seq_num);
> > +int online_tag_group(struct cxl_dc_tag_group *group);
> > #else
> > static inline u64 cxl_dpa_to_hpa(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> > const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa)
> > {
> > return ULLONG_MAX;
> > }
> > +static inline int cxl_add_extent(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
> > + struct cxl_extent *extent, u16 seq_num)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static inline int online_tag_group(struct cxl_dc_tag_group *group)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > static inline
> > struct cxl_region *cxl_dpa_to_region(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa,
> > struct cxl_endpoint_decoder **cxled)
> > @@ -166,6 +178,7 @@ long cxl_pci_get_latency(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> > int cxl_pci_get_bandwidth(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct access_coordinate *c);
> > int cxl_port_get_switch_dport_bandwidth(struct cxl_port *port,
> > struct access_coordinate *c);
> > +void memdev_release_extent(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, struct range *range);
> >
> > static inline struct device *port_to_host(struct cxl_port *port)
> > {
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/extent.c b/drivers/cxl/core/extent.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..94128d06f4ed
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/extent.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/* Copyright(c) 2024 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <cxl.h>
> > +
> > +#include "core.h"
> > +
> > +
> > +static void cxled_release_extent(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
> > + struct dc_extent *dc_extent)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = cxled_to_mds(cxled);
> > + struct device *dev = &cxled->cxld.dev;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "Remove extent %pra (%pU)\n",
> > + &dc_extent->dpa_range, &dc_extent->uuid);
> > + memdev_release_extent(mds, &dc_extent->dpa_range);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void free_tag_group(struct cxl_dc_tag_group *group)
> > +{
> > + xa_destroy(&group->dc_extents);
> > + kfree(group);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dc_extent_release(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct dc_extent *dc_extent = to_dc_extent(dev);
>
> to_dc_extent() can return NULL. Need to check dc_extent before use.
>
done :)
> > + struct cxl_dc_tag_group *group = dc_extent->group;
> > +
> > + cxled_release_extent(dc_extent->cxled, dc_extent);
> > + xa_erase(&group->cxlr_dax->dc_extents, dc_extent->dev.id);
>
> This could potentially be a problem. See comments later with online_tag_group()
>
> > + xa_erase(&group->dc_extents, dc_extent->seq_num);
> > + group->nr_extents--;
> > + if (!group->nr_extents)
> > + free_tag_group(group);
> > + kfree(dc_extent);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct device_type dc_extent_type = {
> > + .name = "extent",
> > + .release = dc_extent_release,
> > +};
> > +
> > +bool is_dc_extent(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + return dev->type == &dc_extent_type;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(is_dc_extent, "CXL");
> > +
> > +static struct cxl_dc_tag_group *
> > +alloc_tag_group(struct cxl_dax_region *cxlr_dax, uuid_t *uuid)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_dc_tag_group *group __free(kfree) =
> > + kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!group)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + group->cxlr_dax = cxlr_dax;
> > + uuid_copy(&group->uuid, uuid);
> > + xa_init(&group->dc_extents);
> > + return no_free_ptr(group);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Stage 1 of the add pipeline: pure, no allocation. Resolve the extent
> > + * to its region/endpoint decoder and ext_range, and verify the range
> > + * fits in the resolved endpoint decoder's DPA resource. Further
> > + * per-extent invariants layer into this function in subsequent commits.
> > + *
> > + * Caller must hold cxl_rwsem.region for read (cxl_dpa_to_region()).
> > + * On success, @out_cxled / @out_cxlr_dax / @out_ext_range carry the
> > + * resolved handles consumed by the rest of the pipeline.
> > + */
> > +static int cxl_validate_extent(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
> > + struct cxl_extent *extent,
> > + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder **out_cxled,
> > + struct cxl_dax_region **out_cxlr_dax,
> > + struct range *out_ext_range)
> > +{
> > + u64 start_dpa = le64_to_cpu(extent->start_dpa);
> > + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = mds->cxlds.cxlmd;
> > + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled;
> > + struct cxl_region *cxlr;
> > + struct range ext_range = (struct range) {
> > + .start = start_dpa,
> > + .end = start_dpa + le64_to_cpu(extent->length) - 1,
> > + };
> > + struct range ed_range;
> > +
> > + cxlr = cxl_dpa_to_region(cxlmd, start_dpa, &cxled);
> > + if (!cxlr)
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > +
> > + ed_range = (struct range) {
> > + .start = cxled->dpa_res->start,
> > + .end = cxled->dpa_res->end,
> > + };
> > + if (!range_contains(&ed_range, &ext_range)) {
> > + dev_err_ratelimited(&cxled->cxld.dev,
> > + "DC extent DPA %pra (%pU) is not fully in ED %pra\n",
> > + &ext_range, extent->uuid, &ed_range);
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *out_cxled = cxled;
> > + *out_cxlr_dax = cxlr->cxlr_dax;
>
> Should there be check for cxled and cxlr->cxlr_dax to make sure they aren't NULL?
>
yes for cxlr->cxlr_dax. cxled should be fine because cxl_dpa_to_region
returns a non-null cxled when a non-null cxlr is returned. So null check
for cxled is encapsulated with null check for cxlr
> > + *out_ext_range = ext_range;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +enum cxl_extent_class {
> > + CXL_EXT_NEW,
> > + CXL_EXT_DUPLICATE,
> > + CXL_EXT_OVERLAP,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Stage 2: classify @ext_range against extents already accepted on this
> > + * cxlr_dax+cxled. Walks cxlr_dax->dc_extents once: a stored extent that
> > + * fully contains @ext_range means a duplicate accept (idempotent, fine);
> > + * a stored extent that only overlaps means an inconsistent offer.
> > + */
> > +static enum cxl_extent_class
> > +cxlr_dax_classify_extent(struct cxl_dax_region *cxlr_dax,
> > + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
> > + const struct range *ext_range)
> > +{
> > + struct dc_extent *entry;
> > + unsigned long i;
> > +
> > + xa_for_each(&cxlr_dax->dc_extents, i, entry) {
> > + if (entry->cxled != cxled)
> > + continue;
> > + if (range_contains(&entry->dpa_range, ext_range))
> > + return CXL_EXT_DUPLICATE;
> > + if (range_overlaps(&entry->dpa_range, ext_range))
> > + return CXL_EXT_OVERLAP;
> > + }
> > + return CXL_EXT_NEW;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Stage 3: allocate and populate a dc_extent for an already-validated,
> > + * already-classified-as-new @ext_range. Only -ENOMEM can fail here.
> > + */
> > +static struct dc_extent *
> > +dc_extent_build(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
> > + struct cxl_dax_region *cxlr_dax,
> > + struct cxl_extent *extent,
> > + const struct range *ext_range, u16 seq_num)
> > +{
> > + resource_size_t dpa_offset = ext_range->start - cxled->dpa_res->start;
> > + resource_size_t hpa = cxled->cxld.hpa_range.start + dpa_offset;
> > + struct dc_extent *dc_extent;
> > +
> > + dc_extent = kzalloc(sizeof(*dc_extent), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!dc_extent)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + dc_extent->cxled = cxled;
> > + dc_extent->dpa_range = *ext_range;
> > + dc_extent->hpa_range.start = hpa - cxlr_dax->hpa_range.start;
> > + dc_extent->hpa_range.end = dc_extent->hpa_range.start +
> > + range_len(ext_range) - 1;
> > + dc_extent->seq_num = seq_num;
> > + import_uuid(&dc_extent->uuid, extent->uuid);
> > + return dc_extent;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Stage 4: insert @dc_extent into the pending tag group. All extents in
> > + * one More-chain group share a UUID — enforced here as the group is
> > + * either being created (first extent) or appended to. On any failure
> > + * the dc_extent is freed.
> > + */
> > +static int cxlr_add_extent(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
> > + struct cxl_dax_region *cxlr_dax,
> > + struct dc_extent *dc_extent)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_dc_tag_group **group = &mds->add_ctx.group;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (*group && !uuid_equal(&(*group)->uuid, &dc_extent->uuid)) {
> > + kfree(dc_extent);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!*group) {
> > + dev_dbg(&cxlr_dax->dev, "Alloc new tag group\n");
> > + *group = alloc_tag_group(cxlr_dax, &dc_extent->uuid);
> > + if (IS_ERR(*group)) {
> > + rc = PTR_ERR(*group);
> > + *group = NULL;
> > + kfree(dc_extent);
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + dev_dbg(&cxlr_dax->dev, "Append dc_extent to tag group\n");
> > + }
> > +
> > + dc_extent->group = *group;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Key by @seq_num so iteration order equals assembly order, in both
> > + * the sharable case (device-stamped 1..n) and the non-sharable case
> > + * (host-assigned arrival-order 1..n). A collision here signals a
> > + * cxl-side validation gap.
> > + */
> > + rc = xa_insert(&(*group)->dc_extents, dc_extent->seq_num,
> > + dc_extent, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + dev_WARN_ONCE(&cxlr_dax->dev, rc == -EBUSY,
> > + "duplicate seq_num %u in tag %pUb\n",
> > + dc_extent->seq_num, &dc_extent->uuid);
> > + kfree(dc_extent);
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int cxl_add_extent(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, struct cxl_extent *extent,
> > + u16 seq_num)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled;
> > + struct cxl_dax_region *cxlr_dax;
> > + struct dc_extent *dc_extent;
> > + struct range ext_range;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + guard(rwsem_read)(&cxl_rwsem.region);
> > +
> > + rc = cxl_validate_extent(mds, extent, &cxled, &cxlr_dax, &ext_range);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + switch (cxlr_dax_classify_extent(cxlr_dax, cxled, &ext_range)) {
> > + case CXL_EXT_DUPLICATE:
> > + /*
> > + * Idempotent accept simplifies the dax-side scan for existing
> > + * extents on region creation; reply success without duplicating.
> > + */
> > + dev_warn_ratelimited(&cxled->cxld.dev,
> > + "Extent %pra exists; accept again\n",
> > + &ext_range);
> > + return 0;
>
> Does this cause issues with the accounting in cxl_add_pending()? At the end the total_accepted would include duplicates as well. I wonder if modify cxlr_add_extent() to return 1 if an extent is added and handle the returns approriately would make the accounting more accurate.
>
ur right. Modified cxlr_add_extent to return 1 on success
> > + case CXL_EXT_OVERLAP:
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > + case CXL_EXT_NEW:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dc_extent = dc_extent_build(cxled, cxlr_dax, extent, &ext_range,
> > + seq_num);
> > + if (IS_ERR(dc_extent))
> > + return PTR_ERR(dc_extent);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(&cxled->cxld.dev, "Add extent %pra (%pU)\n",
> > + &dc_extent->dpa_range, &dc_extent->uuid);
> > +
> > + return cxlr_add_extent(mds, cxlr_dax, dc_extent);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dc_extent_unregister(void *ext)
> > +{
> > + struct dc_extent *dc_extent = ext;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(&dc_extent->dev, "DAX region rm extent HPA %pra\n",
> > + &dc_extent->hpa_range);
> > + device_unregister(&dc_extent->dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void cleanup_pending_dc_extent(struct dc_extent *dc_extent)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_dc_tag_group *group = dc_extent->group;
> > +
> > + cxled_release_extent(dc_extent->cxled, dc_extent);
> > + xa_erase(&group->dc_extents, dc_extent->seq_num);
> > + group->nr_extents--;
> > + if (!group->nr_extents)
> > + free_tag_group(group);
> > + kfree(dc_extent);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int online_tag_group(struct cxl_dc_tag_group *group)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_dax_region *cxlr_dax = group->cxlr_dax;
> > + struct dc_extent *dc_extent;
> > + unsigned long index;
> > + int rc = 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Seed nr_extents with the full group size plus a +1 pin held by
> > + * this function. The size counts every dc_extent that might
> > + * decrement nr_extents on cleanup; the pin keeps @group alive
> > + * across the body even if every dc_extent release fires inside
> > + * the loop (e.g. devm_add_action_or_reset failure on the only
> > + * pending extent). The pin is dropped at the end of the function.
> > + */
> > + xa_for_each(&group->dc_extents, index, dc_extent)
> > + group->nr_extents++;
> > + group->nr_extents++;
> > +
> > + xa_for_each(&group->dc_extents, index, dc_extent) {
> > + struct device *dev = &dc_extent->dev;
> > + u32 id;
> > +
> > + device_initialize(dev);
> > + device_set_pm_not_required(dev);
> > + dev->parent = &cxlr_dax->dev;
> > + dev->type = &dc_extent_type;
> > +
> > + rc = xa_alloc(&cxlr_dax->dc_extents, &id, dc_extent,
> > + xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (rc < 0) {
> > + put_device(dev);
>
> Here xa_alloc() fails, so there no valid id. But the put_device() will trigger dc_extent_release(). And therefore dev->id of 0 is passed in and potentially erase the id 0 slot even if that's not the intended id. Can always define xarray with XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1 to start it at 1 and therefore slot 0 is not used.
>
good catch, thanks! Used the XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1 flag during xa_init_flags
>
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + dev->id = id;
> > +
> > + rc = dev_set_name(dev, "extent%d.%d", cxlr_dax->cxlr->id,
> > + dev->id);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + xa_erase(&cxlr_dax->dc_extents, dev->id);
> > + put_device(dev);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = device_add(dev);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + xa_erase(&cxlr_dax->dc_extents, dev->id);
> > + put_device(dev);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "dc_extent HPA %pra (%pU)\n",
> > + &dc_extent->hpa_range, &group->uuid);
> > +
> > + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(&cxlr_dax->dev,
> > + dc_extent_unregister, dc_extent);
> > + if (rc)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (rc) {
> > + /*
> > + * Unwind every remaining dc_extent in the group. The pin
> > + * above keeps @group alive across this walk. Distinguish
> > + * onlined dc_extents (have a devm action) from pending ones
> > + * via devm_remove_action_nowarn(): a 0 return means the
> > + * action was installed and is now consumed, so we run the
> > + * unregister ourselves; -ENOENT means pending.
> > + */
> > + xa_for_each(&group->dc_extents, index, dc_extent) {
> > + int r = devm_remove_action_nowarn(&cxlr_dax->dev,
> > + dc_extent_unregister,
> > + dc_extent);
> > + if (r == 0)
> > + dc_extent_unregister(dc_extent);
> > + else
> > + cleanup_pending_dc_extent(dc_extent);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Drop the pin; if nothing else still references @group, free it. */
> > + group->nr_extents--;
> > + if (!group->nr_extents)
> > + free_tag_group(group);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> > index c376492fa166..e5edc3975e8f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > #include <linux/unaligned.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/list_sort.h>
> > #include <cxlpci.h>
> > #include <cxlmem.h>
> > #include <cxl.h>
> > @@ -1181,7 +1182,7 @@ static void delete_extent_node(struct cxl_extent_list_node *node)
> > kfree(node);
> > }
> >
> > -static void memdev_release_extent(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, struct range *range)
> > +void memdev_release_extent(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, struct range *range)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = mds->cxlds.dev;
> > struct cxl_extent_list_node *node;
> > @@ -1280,11 +1281,120 @@ static int add_to_pending_list(struct list_head *pending_list,
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * Stub: stage extents on the pending list and reply with an empty
> > - * ADD_DC_RESPONSE on More=0 (refuse all). A later commit replaces
> > - * the no-op tail with the real Add pipeline that surfaces a dax
> > - * device per accepted extent.
> > + * Compare two extents by shared_extn_seq (ascending). list_sort is
> > + * stable so when shared_extn_seq is 0 for every entry (non-sharable
> > + * partition) ties fall back to arrival order via list_add_tail() in
> > + * add_to_pending_list().
> > */
> > +static int extent_seq_compare(void *priv,
> > + const struct list_head *a,
> > + const struct list_head *b)
> > +{
> > + const struct cxl_extent_list_node *ea =
> > + list_entry(a, struct cxl_extent_list_node, list);
> > + const struct cxl_extent_list_node *eb =
> > + list_entry(b, struct cxl_extent_list_node, list);
> > + u16 sa = le16_to_cpu(ea->extent->shared_extn_seq);
> > + u16 sb = le16_to_cpu(eb->extent->shared_extn_seq);
> > +
> > + if (sa < sb)
> > + return -1;
> > + if (sa > sb)
> > + return 1;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Move every pending extent whose tag matches @tag onto @group, preserving
> > + * the order they appear in @pending.
> > + */
> > +static void extract_tag_group(struct list_head *pending,
> > + const uuid_t *tag,
> > + struct list_head *group)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_extent_list_node *pos, *tmp;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, pending, list) {
> > + uuid_t t;
> > +
> > + import_uuid(&t, pos->extent->uuid);
> > + if (uuid_equal(&t, tag))
> > + list_move_tail(&pos->list, group);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Drive the pending Add-Capacity records through cxl_add_extent(),
> > + * grouped by tag. Per group: extract from pending, stable-sort by
> > + * shared_extn_seq, then attempt to add each extent. Online the tag
> > + * group via online_tag_group() once all of its extents have been
> > + * realized. Validation gates layer onto this loop in later commits.
> > + */
> > +static int cxl_add_pending(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = mds->cxlds.dev;
> > + struct list_head *pending = &mds->add_ctx.pending_extents;
> > + struct cxl_extent_list_node *pos, *tmp;
> > + LIST_HEAD(accepted);
> > + int total_accepted = 0;
> > +
> > + while (!list_empty(pending)) {
> > + LIST_HEAD(group);
> > + struct cxl_dc_tag_group *tag_group;
> > + int group_cnt = 0;
> > + uuid_t tag;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + import_uuid(&tag,
> > + list_first_entry(pending,
> > + struct cxl_extent_list_node,
> > + list)->extent->uuid);
> > + extract_tag_group(pending, &tag, &group);
> > + list_sort(NULL, &group, extent_seq_compare);
> > +
> > + u16 logical_seq = 1;
>
> declaring var in middle of code
>
Moved up to top of function
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &group, list) {
> > + u16 raw = le16_to_cpu(pos->extent->shared_extn_seq);
> > + u16 seq = raw ? raw : logical_seq;
> > +
> > + logical_seq++;
> > +
> > + if (cxl_add_extent(mds, pos->extent, seq)) {
> > + dev_dbg(dev,
> > + "Tag %pUb: failed to add extent DPA:%#llx LEN:%#llx\n",
> > + &tag,
> > + le64_to_cpu(pos->extent->start_dpa),
> > + le64_to_cpu(pos->extent->length));
> > + delete_extent_node(pos);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + group_cnt++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + tag_group = mds->add_ctx.group;
> > + if (!tag_group)
> > + continue;
>
> Does it need to add delete_extent_node() for the group before continue?
>
Yes, fixed!
> DJ
>
Thanks,
Anisa
> > +
> > + rc = online_tag_group(tag_group);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + dev_warn(dev,
> > + "Tag %pUb: failed to online tag group (%d)\n",
> > + &tag, rc);
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &group, list)
> > + delete_extent_node(pos);
> > + } else {
> > + list_splice_tail_init(&group, &accepted);
> > + total_accepted += group_cnt;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mds->add_ctx.group = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + list_splice(&accepted, pending);
> > + return cxl_send_dc_response(mds, CXL_MBOX_OP_ADD_DC_RESPONSE,
> > + pending, total_accepted);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int handle_add_event(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
> > struct cxl_event_dcd *event)
> > {
> > @@ -1316,8 +1426,7 @@ static int handle_add_event(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
> > ctx->armed = false;
> > cancel_delayed_work(&ctx->timeout_work);
> >
> > - rc = cxl_send_dc_response(mds, CXL_MBOX_OP_ADD_DC_RESPONSE,
> > - &mds->add_ctx.pending_extents, 0);
> > + rc = cxl_add_pending(mds);
> > clear_pending_extents(mds);
> > return rc;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region_dax.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region_dax.c
> > index d6bf69155827..519e203c486a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region_dax.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region_dax.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ static void cxl_dax_region_release(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct cxl_dax_region *cxlr_dax = to_cxl_dax_region(dev);
> >
> > + xa_destroy(&cxlr_dax->dc_extents);
> > kfree(cxlr_dax);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -57,11 +58,13 @@ static struct cxl_dax_region *cxl_dax_region_alloc(struct cxl_region *cxlr)
> > if (!cxlr_dax)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > + xa_init_flags(&cxlr_dax->dc_extents, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> > cxlr_dax->hpa_range.start = p->res->start;
> > cxlr_dax->hpa_range.end = p->res->end;
> >
> > dev = &cxlr_dax->dev;
> > cxlr_dax->cxlr = cxlr;
> > + cxlr->cxlr_dax = cxlr_dax;
> > device_initialize(dev);
> > lockdep_set_class(&dev->mutex, &cxl_dax_region_key);
> > device_set_pm_not_required(dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > index 5ef2cf4d005b..cbbfba92fea9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > @@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ struct cxl_region_params {
> > * @type: Endpoint decoder target type
> > * @cxl_nvb: nvdimm bridge for coordinating @cxlr_pmem setup / shutdown
> > * @cxlr_pmem: (for pmem regions) cached copy of the nvdimm bridge
> > + * @cxlr_dax: (for DC regions) cached copy of CXL DAX bridge
> > * @flags: Region state flags
> > * @params: active + config params for the region
> > * @coord: QoS access coordinates for the region
> > @@ -510,6 +511,7 @@ struct cxl_region {
> > enum cxl_decoder_type type;
> > struct cxl_nvdimm_bridge *cxl_nvb;
> > struct cxl_pmem_region *cxlr_pmem;
> > + struct cxl_dax_region *cxlr_dax;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > struct cxl_region_params params;
> > struct access_coordinate coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX];
> > @@ -568,6 +570,15 @@ struct cxl_dax_region {
> > struct device dev;
> > struct cxl_region *cxlr;
> > struct range hpa_range;
> > + /*
> > + * dc_extents is keyed by an allocator-assigned u32 (see
> > + * online_tag_group()). Tag groups have no first-class identity in
> > + * this xarray; siblings within a tag find each other via
> > + * dc_extent->group. Tag-uniqueness lookup is a linear xa_for_each
> > + * walk, adequate at the bounded per-region extent counts the
> > + * driver handles.
> > + */
> > + struct xarray dc_extents;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -595,6 +606,14 @@ struct cxl_dc_tag_group {
> > unsigned int nr_extents;
> > };
> >
> > +bool is_dc_extent(struct device *dev);
> > +static inline struct dc_extent *to_dc_extent(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (!is_dc_extent(dev))
> > + return NULL;
> > + return container_of(dev, struct dc_extent, dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * struct cxl_port - logical collection of upstream port devices and
> > * downstream port devices to construct a CXL memory
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild b/tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild
> > index 2be1df80fcc9..8941cf187462 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild
> > +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild
> > @@ -63,7 +63,10 @@ cxl_core-y += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/hdm.o
> > cxl_core-y += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/pmu.o
> > cxl_core-y += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/cdat.o
> > cxl_core-$(CONFIG_TRACING) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/trace.o
> > -cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_REGION) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/region.o $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/region_pmem.o $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/region_dax.o
> > +cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_REGION) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/region.o \
> > + $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/region_pmem.o \
> > + $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/region_dax.o \
> > + $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/extent.o
> > cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_MCE) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/mce.o
> > cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_FEATURES) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/features.o
> > cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_EDAC_MEM_FEATURES) += $(CXL_CORE_SRC)/edac.o
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-23 9:42 [PATCH v10 00/31] DCD: Add support for Dynamic Capacity Devices (DCD) Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:42 ` [PATCH v10 01/31] cxl/mbox: Flag " Anisa Su
2026-05-27 21:34 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-30 6:22 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:42 ` [PATCH v10 02/31] cxl/mem: Read dynamic capacity configuration from the device Anisa Su
2026-05-27 22:28 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-30 6:40 ` Anisa Su
2026-06-01 15:23 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-02 9:46 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:42 ` [PATCH v10 03/31] cxl/cdat: Gather DSMAS data for DCD partitions Anisa Su
2026-05-27 23:16 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-30 6:45 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:42 ` [PATCH v10 04/31] cxl/core: Enforce partition order/simplify partition calls Anisa Su
2026-05-27 23:37 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-30 6:57 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:42 ` [PATCH v10 05/31] cxl/mem: Expose dynamic ram A partition in sysfs Anisa Su
2026-05-27 23:54 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-27 23:56 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-30 7:04 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 06/31] cxl/port: Add 'dynamic_ram_a' to endpoint decoder mode Anisa Su
2026-05-28 0:01 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-30 7:07 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 07/31] cxl/region: Add DC DAX region support Anisa Su
2026-05-28 0:16 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-02 9:22 ` Anisa Su
2026-06-02 15:42 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-18 20:21 ` Alison Schofield
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 08/31] cxl/events: Split event msgnum configuration from irq setup Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 09/31] cxl/pci: Factor out interrupt policy check Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 10/31] cxl/mem: Configure dynamic capacity interrupts Anisa Su
2026-05-28 16:21 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-08 8:16 ` Anisa Su
2026-06-10 16:57 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-11 18:19 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 11/31] cxl/core: Return endpoint decoder information from region search Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 12/31] cxl/mem: Set up framework for handling DC Events Anisa Su
2026-05-28 16:40 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-09 17:34 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 13/31] cxl/mem: Add 20 second timeout for stalled DC_ADD_CAPACITY chains Anisa Su
2026-05-28 16:57 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-09 17:36 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 14/31] cxl/extent: Handle DC Add Capacity events Anisa Su
2026-05-28 19:06 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-10 3:48 ` Anisa Su [this message]
2026-06-24 9:16 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 15/31] cxl/mem: Drop misaligned DCD extent groups Anisa Su
2026-05-28 21:03 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-11 6:22 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 16/31] cxl/extent: Validate DC extent partition Anisa Su
2026-05-28 21:34 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-11 7:35 ` Anisa Su
2026-06-24 9:04 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 17/31] cxl/mem: Enforce tag-group semantics Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 18/31] cxl/extent: Handle DC Release Capacity events Anisa Su
2026-05-28 22:13 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-12 5:56 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 19/31] cxl/extent: Enforce cross-region tag uniqueness Anisa Su
2026-05-28 22:44 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 20/31] cxl/region/extent: Expose dc_extent information in sysfs Anisa Su
2026-05-28 22:54 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-12 5:58 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 21/31] cxl + dax: Surface dax_resources on DCD Add Capacity events Anisa Su
2026-05-28 23:41 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-16 8:44 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 22/31] cxl + dax: Release dax_resources on DCD Release " Anisa Su
2026-05-28 23:53 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-16 8:52 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 23/31] dax/bus: Factor out dev dax resize logic Anisa Su
2026-06-24 8:36 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 24/31] dax/bus: Add uuid sysfs attribute to dax devices Anisa Su
2026-05-29 17:07 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 25/31] dax/bus: Reject resize on DC dax devices and enforce 0-size creation Anisa Su
2026-05-29 17:16 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-16 8:54 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 26/31] dax/bus: Tag-aware uuid claim and show on DC dax devices Anisa Su
2026-05-29 17:53 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-16 9:01 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 27/31] cxl/region: Read existing extents on region creation Anisa Su
2026-05-29 21:30 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-16 9:39 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 28/31] cxl/mem: Trace Dynamic capacity Event Record Anisa Su
2026-05-29 22:41 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-16 9:59 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 29/31] tools/testing/cxl: Make event logs dynamic Anisa Su
2026-05-29 22:58 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-16 10:29 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 30/31] tools/testing/cxl: Add DC Regions to mock mem data Anisa Su
2026-05-29 23:42 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-25 11:22 ` Anisa Su
2026-05-23 9:43 ` [PATCH v10 31/31] Documentation/cxl: Document DCD extent handling and DC-backed DAX regions Anisa Su
2026-05-27 18:51 ` [PATCH v10 00/31] DCD: Add support for Dynamic Capacity Devices (DCD) Dave Jiang
2026-05-30 0:16 ` Anisa Su
2026-06-05 5:35 ` Alison Schofield
2026-06-08 7:54 ` Anisa Su
2026-06-24 7:49 ` Anisa Su
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aijefzv5pa40BIdB@AnisaLaptop.localdomain \
--to=anisa.su887@gmail.com \
--cc=John@groves.net \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®