From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:47:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424170021.5749.22.camel@tkhai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150217104516.12144.85911.stgit@tkhai>
We migrate a task using TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state of on_rq:
raw_spin_lock(&old_rq->lock);
deactivate_task(old_rq, p, 0);
p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING;
set_task_cpu(p, new_cpu);
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
I.e.:
write TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING
smp_wmb() (in __set_task_cpu)
write new_cpu
But {,__}task_rq_lock() don't use smp_rmb(), and they may see
the cpu and TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING in opposite order. In this case
{,__}task_rq_lock() lock new_rq before the task is actually queued
on it.
Fix that using ordered reading.
Fixes: cca26e8009d1 "sched: Teach scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state"
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 8 ++++++--
kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 ++++++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index fc12a1d..a42fb88 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -319,8 +319,12 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
rq = task_rq(p);
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
- if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
- return rq;
+ if (likely(rq == task_rq(p))) {
+ /* Pairs with smp_wmb() in __set_task_cpu() */
+ smp_rmb();
+ if (likely(!task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+ return rq;
+ }
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index f65f57c..4d7b03c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1031,8 +1031,12 @@ static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p)
for (;;) {
rq = task_rq(p);
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
- if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
- return rq;
+ if (likely(rq == task_rq(p))) {
+ /* Pairs with smp_wmb() in __set_task_cpu() */
+ smp_rmb();
+ if (likely(!task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+ return rq;
+ }
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
next parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-17 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150217104516.12144.85911.stgit@tkhai>
2015-02-17 10:47 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2015-02-17 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 12:36 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-17 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-17 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 18:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 15:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 16:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 19:14 ` Manfred Spraul
2015-02-18 22:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 14:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-20 18:28 ` Manfred Spraul
2015-02-20 18:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-20 20:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-21 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-25 19:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-26 10:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-28 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 15:53 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:44 ` [PATCH] spinlock: clarify doc for raw_spin_unlock_wait() Chris Metcalf
2015-04-29 17:34 ` Manfred Spraul
2015-04-28 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] tile: modify arch_spin_unlock_wait() semantics Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] tile: use READ_ONCE() in arch_spin_is_locked() Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:58 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 18:00 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 18:38 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 20:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-21 3:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-23 18:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 17:05 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Clarify ordering between task_rq_lock() and move_queued_task() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1424170021.5749.22.camel@tkhai \
--to=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®