From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ktkhai@parallels.com,
mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, oleg@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Clarify ordering between task_rq_lock() and move_queued_task()
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:05:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-74b8a4cb6ce3685049ee124243a52238c5cabe55@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150217121258.GM5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Commit-ID: 74b8a4cb6ce3685049ee124243a52238c5cabe55
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/74b8a4cb6ce3685049ee124243a52238c5cabe55
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:07:38 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:27:28 +0100
sched: Clarify ordering between task_rq_lock() and move_queued_task()
There was a wee bit of confusion around the exact ordering here;
clarify things.
Reported-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150217121258.GM5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 1f37fe7..fd0a6ed 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -341,6 +341,22 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
rq = task_rq(p);
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+ /*
+ * move_queued_task() task_rq_lock()
+ *
+ * ACQUIRE (rq->lock)
+ * [S] ->on_rq = MIGRATING [L] rq = task_rq()
+ * WMB (__set_task_cpu()) ACQUIRE (rq->lock);
+ * [S] ->cpu = new_cpu [L] task_rq()
+ * [L] ->on_rq
+ * RELEASE (rq->lock)
+ *
+ * If we observe the old cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire of
+ * the old rq->lock will fully serialize against the stores.
+ *
+ * If we observe the new cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire will
+ * pair with the WMB to ensure we must then also see migrating.
+ */
if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
return rq;
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-18 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150217104516.12144.85911.stgit@tkhai>
2015-02-17 10:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 12:36 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-17 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-17 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 18:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 15:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 16:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 19:14 ` Manfred Spraul
2015-02-18 22:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 14:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-20 18:28 ` Manfred Spraul
2015-02-20 18:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-20 20:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-21 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-25 19:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-26 10:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-28 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 15:53 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:44 ` [PATCH] spinlock: clarify doc for raw_spin_unlock_wait() Chris Metcalf
2015-04-29 17:34 ` Manfred Spraul
2015-04-28 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] tile: modify arch_spin_unlock_wait() semantics Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] tile: use READ_ONCE() in arch_spin_is_locked() Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:58 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 18:00 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 18:38 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 20:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-21 3:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-23 18:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 17:05 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-74b8a4cb6ce3685049ee124243a52238c5cabe55@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome