mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:43:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150428174323.GL5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <553FBC4F.3070104@ezchip.com>

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:58:55PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 12:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:53:21AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> >
> >>The reason we use two 32-bit fields on tilepro is that the only available
> >>atomic instruction is tns (test and set), which sets a 32-bit "1" value
> >>into the target memory and returns the old 32-bit value.
> >And you want a ticket lock as opposed to the test-and-set lock because
> >with 64 tiles starvation under contention is a real worry?
> 
> We see substantial unfairness under load with a plain spinlock,
> basically because nearer cores on the mesh network can exponentially
> crowd out further cores.  The ticket lock avoids that, though we
> have to be careful to do backoff when checking the lock to avoid
> DDoS in the mesh network.

Does your arch have 16bit atomic load/stores ? If so, would something
like the below not make sense?

typedef struct {
	union {
		struct {
			unsigned short head;
			unsigned short tail;
		};
		unsigned int tickets;
	};
	unsigned int lock;
} arch_spinlock_t;

static inline void ___tns_lock(unsigned int *lock)
{
	while (tns(lock))
		cpu_relax();
}

static inline void ___tns_unlock(unsigned int *lock)
{
	WRITE_ONCE(*lock, 0);
}

static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
	unsigned short head, tail;

	___tns_lock(&lock->lock); /* XXX does the TNS imply a ___sync?  */
	head = lock->head;
	lock->head++;
	___tns_unlock(&lock->lock);

	while (READ_ONCE(lock->tail) != head)
		cpu_relax();
}

static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
	/*
	 * can do with regular load/store because the lock owner
	 * is the only one going to do stores to the tail
	 */
	unsigned short tail = READ_ONCE(lock->tail);
	smp_mb(); /* MB is stronger than RELEASE */
	WRITE_ONCE(lock->tail, tail + 1);
}

static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
	union {
		struct {
			unsigned short head;
			unsigned short tail;
		};
		unsigned int tickets;
	} x;

	for (;;) {
		x.tickets = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
		if (x.head == x.tail)
			break;
		cpu_relax();
	}
}

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-28 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20150217104516.12144.85911.stgit@tkhai>
2015-02-17 10:47 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 12:36     ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 12:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 13:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 16:05       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-17 18:01         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-17 18:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:45             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 13:41               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 18:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:52           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 13:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 18:43               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 15:53             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 16:11               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 16:32                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 19:23                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 15:59             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 19:14               ` Manfred Spraul
2015-02-18 22:43                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 14:19                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-20 18:28                     ` Manfred Spraul
2015-02-20 18:45                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-20 20:23                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-21 12:54                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-25 19:56                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-26 10:52                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-28 14:33                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 15:53                               ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 16:24                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:44                                   ` [PATCH] spinlock: clarify doc for raw_spin_unlock_wait() Chris Metcalf
2015-04-29 17:34                                     ` Manfred Spraul
2015-04-28 17:33                                   ` [PATCH 1/2] tile: modify arch_spin_unlock_wait() semantics Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 17:33                                     ` [PATCH 2/2] tile: use READ_ONCE() in arch_spin_is_locked() Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 16:40                                 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:58                                   ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 17:43                                     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-04-28 18:00                                       ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 18:24                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 18:38                                           ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 14:32                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 20:33                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-21  3:26                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-23 18:29                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 17:05     ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Clarify ordering between task_rq_lock() and move_queued_task() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150428174323.GL5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome