mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: bp@alien8.de, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: [Part1 PATCH v6 08/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:34:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171016153423.2980-9-brijesh.singh@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171016153423.2980-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

The walk_iomem_res_desc(), walk_system_ram_res() and walk_system_ram_range()
functions each have much of the same code.  Create a new function that
consolidates the common code from these functions in one place to reduce
the amount of duplicated code.

Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
 kernel/resource.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 9b5f04404152..7323c1b636cd 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -400,6 +400,26 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
+				 bool first_level_children_only,
+				 void *arg, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
+{
+	u64 orig_end = res->end;
+	int ret = -1;
+
+	while ((res->start < res->end) &&
+	       !find_next_iomem_res(res, desc, first_level_children_only)) {
+		ret = (*func)(res->start, res->end, arg);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+
+		res->start = res->end + 1;
+		res->end = orig_end;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Walks through iomem resources and calls func() with matching resource
  * ranges. This walks through whole tree and not just first level children.
@@ -418,26 +438,12 @@ int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
 		u64 end, void *arg, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
 {
 	struct resource res;
-	u64 orig_end;
-	int ret = -1;
 
 	res.start = start;
 	res.end = end;
 	res.flags = flags;
-	orig_end = res.end;
-
-	while ((res.start < res.end) &&
-		(!find_next_iomem_res(&res, desc, false))) {
-
-		ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
-		if (ret)
-			break;
-
-		res.start = res.end + 1;
-		res.end = orig_end;
-	}
 
-	return ret;
+	return __walk_iomem_res_desc(&res, desc, false, arg, func);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -451,22 +457,13 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
 				int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
 {
 	struct resource res;
-	u64 orig_end;
-	int ret = -1;
 
 	res.start = start;
 	res.end = end;
 	res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
-	orig_end = res.end;
-	while ((res.start < res.end) &&
-		(!find_next_iomem_res(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true))) {
-		ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
-		if (ret)
-			break;
-		res.start = res.end + 1;
-		res.end = orig_end;
-	}
-	return ret;
+
+	return __walk_iomem_res_desc(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true,
+				     arg, func);
 }
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY)
@@ -508,6 +505,7 @@ static int __is_ram(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, void *arg)
 {
 	return 1;
 }
+
 /*
  * This generic page_is_ram() returns true if specified address is
  * registered as System RAM in iomem_resource list.
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-16 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-16 15:34 [Part1 PATCH v6 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 02/17] x86/mm: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 16:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 17:46     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 18:18       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 19:51   ` [Part1 PATCH v6.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 03/17] x86/mm: Don't attempt to encrypt initrd under SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 04/17] x86/realmode: Don't decrypt trampoline area " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 05/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 06/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 07/17] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 09/17] resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 10/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 11/17] x86/mm: Add DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 12/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 14/17] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 18:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 19:56   ` [Part1 PATCH v6.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 21:25     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 15/17] percpu: Introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 16/17] X86/KVM: Decrypt shared per-cpu variables when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 22:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17  1:43     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-17  8:20       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17 11:54         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-17 13:35           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17 15:42             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-17 16:23               ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-19 13:44   ` [Part1 PATCH v6.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-19 15:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 17/17] X86/KVM: Clear encryption attribute " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-19 13:47   ` [Part1 PATCH v6.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:42 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-10-20  9:24 ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171016153423.2980-9-brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®