mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v6 16/17] X86/KVM: Decrypt shared per-cpu variables when SEV is active
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:24:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171016222416.x26tp222x2ox3tkz@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171016153423.2980-17-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:34:22AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> When SEV is active, guest memory is encrypted with a guest-specific key, a
> guest memory region shared with the hypervisor must be mapped as decrypted
> before we can share it.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v5:
> early_set_memory_decrypt() takes care of decrypting the memory contents
> and changing the C bit hence there is no need to use explicit call
> (sme_early_decrypt) to decrypt the memory contents.
> 
> Boris,
> 
> I removed your R-b since I was not sure if you are okay with the above changes.
> please let me know if you are okay with the changes. thanks
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index 8bb9594d0761..ff0f04077925 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ static int parse_no_kvmclock_vsyscall(char *arg)
>  
>  early_param("no-kvmclock-vsyscall", parse_no_kvmclock_vsyscall);
>  
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, apf_reason) __aligned(64);
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time) __aligned(64);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, apf_reason) __aligned(64);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time) __aligned(64);
>  static int has_steal_clock = 0;
>  
>  /*
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static void kvm_register_steal_time(void)
>  		cpu, (unsigned long long) slow_virt_to_phys(st));
>  }
>  
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_apic_eoi) = KVM_PV_EOI_DISABLED;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED(unsigned long, kvm_apic_eoi) = KVM_PV_EOI_DISABLED;
>  
>  static notrace void kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write(u32 reg, u32 val)
>  {
> @@ -426,9 +426,37 @@ void kvm_disable_steal_time(void)
>  	wrmsr(MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME, 0, 0);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void __set_percpu_decrypted(void *ptr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	early_set_memory_decrypted(slow_virt_to_phys(ptr), size);
> +}

Ok, so this looks like useless conversion:

you pass in a virtual address, it gets converted to a physical address
with slow_virt_to_phys() and then in early_set_memory_enc_dec() gets
converted to a virtual address again.

Why? Why not pass the virtual address directly?

> +/*
> + * Iterate through all possible CPUs and map the memory region pointed
> + * by apf_reason, steal_time and kvm_apic_eoi as decrypted at once.
> + *
> + * Note: we iterate through all possible CPUs to ensure that CPUs
> + * hotplugged will have their per-cpu variable already mapped as
> + * decrypted.
> + */
> +static void __init sev_map_percpu_data(void)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (!sev_active())
> +		return;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		__set_percpu_decrypted(&per_cpu(apf_reason, cpu), sizeof(apf_reason));
> +		__set_percpu_decrypted(&per_cpu(steal_time, cpu), sizeof(steal_time));
> +		__set_percpu_decrypted(&per_cpu(kvm_apic_eoi, cpu), sizeof(kvm_apic_eoi));
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
>  {
> +	sev_map_percpu_data();
>  	kvm_guest_cpu_init();
>  	native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu();
>  	kvm_spinlock_init();
> @@ -496,6 +524,7 @@ void __init kvm_guest_init(void)
>  				      kvm_cpu_online, kvm_cpu_down_prepare) < 0)
>  		pr_err("kvm_guest: Failed to install cpu hotplug callbacks\n");
>  #else
> +	sev_map_percpu_data();
>  	kvm_guest_cpu_init();
>  #endif

Why isn't it enough to call

	sev_map_percpu_data()

at the end of kvm_guest_init() only but you have to call it in
kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu() too? I mean, once you map those things
decrypted, there's no need to do them again...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-16 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-16 15:34 [Part1 PATCH v6 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 02/17] x86/mm: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 16:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 17:46     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 18:18       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 19:51   ` [Part1 PATCH v6.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 03/17] x86/mm: Don't attempt to encrypt initrd under SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 04/17] x86/realmode: Don't decrypt trampoline area " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 05/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 06/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 07/17] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 08/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 09/17] resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 10/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 11/17] x86/mm: Add DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 12/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 14/17] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 18:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 19:56   ` [Part1 PATCH v6.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 21:25     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 15/17] percpu: Introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 16/17] X86/KVM: Decrypt shared per-cpu variables when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 22:24   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-10-17  1:43     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-17  8:20       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17 11:54         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-17 13:35           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17 15:42             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-17 16:23               ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-19 13:44   ` [Part1 PATCH v6.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-19 15:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-16 15:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 17/17] X86/KVM: Clear encryption attribute " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-19 13:47   ` [Part1 PATCH v6.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-10-16 15:42 ` [Part1 PATCH v6 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-10-20  9:24 ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171016222416.x26tp222x2ox3tkz@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®