From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
David.Kaplan@amd.com, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 02/17] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:12:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230809072200.543939260@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230809071218.000335006@infradead.org>
Use the existing configurable return thunk. There is absolute no
justification for having created this __x86_return_thunk alternative.
To clarify, the whole thing looks like:
Zen3/4 does:
srso_alias_untrain_ret:
nop2
lfence
jmp srso_alias_return_thunk
int3
srso_alias_safe_ret: // aliasses srso_alias_untrain_ret just so
add $8, %rsp
ret
int3
srso_alias_return_thunk:
call srso_alias_safe_ret
ud2
While Zen1/2 does:
srso_untrain_ret:
movabs $foo, %rax
lfence
call srso_safe_ret (jmp srso_return_thunk ?)
int3
srso_safe_ret: // embedded in movabs immediate
add $8,%rsp
ret
int3
srso_return_thunk:
call srso_safe_ret
ud2
While retbleed does:
zen_untrain_ret:
test $0xcc, %bl
lfence
jmp zen_return_thunk
int3
zen_return_thunk: // embedded in the test instruction
ret
int3
Where Zen1/2 flush the BTB using the instruction decoder trick
(test,movabs) Zen3/4 use instruction aliasing. SRSO adds RSB (RAP in
AMD speak) stuffing to force a return mis-predict.
That is; the AMD retbleed is a form of Speculative-Type-Confusion
where the branch predictor is trained to use the BTB to predict the
RET address, while AMD inception/SRSO is a form of
Speculative-Type-Confusion where another instruction is trained to be
treated like a CALL instruction and poison the RSB (RAP).
Pick one of three options at boot.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 4 +++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 7 ++++--
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 2 -
arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -342,9 +342,13 @@ extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_
extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_jump_thunk_array[];
extern void __x86_return_thunk(void);
+extern void srso_return_thunk(void);
+extern void srso_alias_return_thunk(void);
+
extern void zen_untrain_ret(void);
extern void srso_untrain_ret(void);
extern void srso_untrain_ret_alias(void);
+
extern void entry_ibpb(void);
extern void (*x86_return_thunk)(void);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -2305,10 +2305,13 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigatio
*/
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
- if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19)
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19) {
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_ALIAS);
- else
+ x86_return_thunk = srso_alias_return_thunk;
+ } else {
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO);
+ x86_return_thunk = srso_return_thunk;
+ }
srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET;
} else {
pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with CPU_SRSO.\n");
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RETHUNK
-. = ASSERT((__ret & 0x3f) == 0, "__ret not cacheline-aligned");
+. = ASSERT((__x86_return_thunk & 0x3f) == 0, "__x86_return_thunk not cacheline-aligned");
. = ASSERT((srso_safe_ret & 0x3f) == 0, "srso_safe_ret not cacheline-aligned");
#endif
--- a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
@@ -151,10 +151,11 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__x86_indirect_jump_thunk_a
.section .text.__x86.rethunk_untrain
SYM_START(srso_untrain_ret_alias, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
+ UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
ASM_NOP2
lfence
- jmp __x86_return_thunk
+ jmp srso_alias_return_thunk
SYM_FUNC_END(srso_untrain_ret_alias)
__EXPORT_THUNK(srso_untrain_ret_alias)
@@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(srso_safe_ret_alias)
* from re-poisioning the BTB prediction.
*/
.align 64
- .skip 64 - (__ret - zen_untrain_ret), 0xcc
+ .skip 64 - (__x86_return_thunk - zen_untrain_ret), 0xcc
SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
/*
@@ -216,10 +217,10 @@ SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL,
* evicted, __x86_return_thunk will suffer Straight Line Speculation
* which will be contained safely by the INT3.
*/
-SYM_INNER_LABEL(__ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
+SYM_INNER_LABEL(__x86_return_thunk, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
ret
int3
-SYM_CODE_END(__ret)
+SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
/*
* Ensure the TEST decoding / BTB invalidation is complete.
@@ -230,11 +231,13 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__ret)
* Jump back and execute the RET in the middle of the TEST instruction.
* INT3 is for SLS protection.
*/
- jmp __ret
+ jmp __x86_return_thunk
int3
SYM_FUNC_END(zen_untrain_ret)
__EXPORT_THUNK(zen_untrain_ret)
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__x86_return_thunk)
+
/*
* SRSO untraining sequence for Zen1/2, similar to zen_untrain_ret()
* above. On kernel entry, srso_untrain_ret() is executed which is a
@@ -257,6 +260,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(srso_safe_ret, SYM_L_GLO
int3
int3
int3
+ /* end of movabs */
lfence
call srso_safe_ret
int3
@@ -264,12 +268,23 @@ SYM_CODE_END(srso_safe_ret)
SYM_FUNC_END(srso_untrain_ret)
__EXPORT_THUNK(srso_untrain_ret)
-SYM_FUNC_START(__x86_return_thunk)
- ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp __ret", "call srso_safe_ret", X86_FEATURE_SRSO, \
- "call srso_safe_ret_alias", X86_FEATURE_SRSO_ALIAS
- int3
-SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__x86_return_thunk)
+/*
+ * Both these do an unbalanced CALL to mess up the RSB, terminate with UD2
+ * to indicate noreturn.
+ */
+SYM_CODE_START(srso_return_thunk)
+ UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
+ ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
+ call srso_safe_ret
+ ud2
+SYM_CODE_END(srso_return_thunk)
+
+SYM_CODE_START(srso_alias_return_thunk)
+ UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
+ ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
+ call srso_safe_ret_alias
+ ud2
+SYM_CODE_END(srso_alias_return_thunk)
#endif /* CONFIG_RETHUNK */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-09 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 7:12 [RFC][PATCH 00/17] Fix up the recent SRSO patches Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/17] x86/alternative: Unconditional custom return thunk Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 9:31 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-10 11:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-09 7:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-08-09 15:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/17] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-10 11:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 12:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-11 7:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-11 17:00 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-08-12 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/17] x86/cpu: Make srso_untrain_ret consistent Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 12:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/17] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 12:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 15:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/17] x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 12:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-12 18:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/17] x86/cpu: Add SRSO untrain to retbleed= Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 15:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:31 ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-09 14:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-10 15:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 16:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-11 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-12 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-12 12:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 15:45 ` David Laight
2023-08-12 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-12 12:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/17] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-13 10:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/17] x86/cpu: Add IBPB on VMEXIT to retbleed= Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/17] x86: Remove CONFIG_CPU_SRSO Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/17] x86: Remove CPU_IBPB_ENTRY Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/17] x86/cpu: Remove all SRSO interface nonsense Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:10 ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-09 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 15:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/17] x86/cpu: Rename original retbleed return thunk Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 11:06 ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-10 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-13 15:23 ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-14 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:31 ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-14 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/17] objtool/x86: Add arch_is_offset_insn() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 9:56 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-09 14:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/17] objtool: Add comments to the arch_is_$foo() magic symbols Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/17] x86/cpu: Rename srso_(.*)_alias to srso_alias_\1 Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/17] x86/alternatives: Simplify ALTERNATIVE_n() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/17] x86/cpu: Use fancy alternatives to get rid of entry_untrain_ret() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/17] Fix up the recent SRSO patches Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-09 10:04 ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-09 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230809072200.543939260@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=David.Kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome