mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	David.Kaplan@amd.com, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com,
	jpoimboe@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 12/17] x86/cpu: Rename original retbleed return thunk
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:12:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230809072201.259675763@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230809071218.000335006@infradead.org>

Rename the original retbleed return thunk from __x86_return_thunk to
zen_return_thunk, matching zen_untrain_ret.

Pull the dummy __x86_return_thunk from the !CPU_UNRET_ENTRY case and
explicitly set zen_return_thunk in the retbleed=unret case.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c           |    1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S        |    2 +-
 arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S             |   25 +++++++++++--------------
 tools/objtool/check.c                |    9 +++++++--
 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -339,6 +339,8 @@ extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_
 extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_jump_thunk_array[];
 
 extern void __x86_return_thunk(void);
+
+extern void zen_return_thunk(void);
 extern void srso_return_thunk(void);
 extern void srso_alias_return_thunk(void);
 
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -953,6 +953,7 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitig
 
 	case RETBLEED_MITIGATION_UNRET:
 		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
+		x86_return_thunk = zen_return_thunk;
 do_rethunk:
 		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
 
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY
-. = ASSERT((__x86_return_thunk & 0x3f) == 0, "__x86_return_thunk not cacheline-aligned");
+. = ASSERT((zen_return_thunk & 0x3f) == 0, "zen_return_thunk not cacheline-aligned");
 . = ASSERT((srso_safe_ret & 0x3f) == 0, "srso_safe_ret not cacheline-aligned");
 /*
  * GNU ld cannot do XOR so do: (A | B) - (A & B) in order to compute the XOR
--- a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ __EXPORT_THUNK(srso_untrain_ret_alias)
 
 	.section .text.__x86.rethunk_safe
 
-/* Needs a definition for the __x86_return_thunk alternative below. */
+/* Needs a definition for the zen_return_thunk alternative below. */
 SYM_START(srso_safe_ret_alias, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
 	add $8, %_ASM_SP
 	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(srso_safe_ret_alias)
 
 /*
  * Safety details here pertain to the AMD Zen{1,2} microarchitecture:
- * 1) The RET at __x86_return_thunk must be on a 64 byte boundary, for
+ * 1) The RET at zen_return_thunk must be on a 64 byte boundary, for
  *    alignment within the BTB.
  * 2) The instruction at zen_untrain_ret must contain, and not
  *    end with, the 0xc3 byte of the RET.
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(srso_safe_ret_alias)
  *    from re-poisioning the BTB prediction.
  */
 	.align 64
-	.skip 64 - (__x86_return_thunk - zen_untrain_ret), 0xcc
+	.skip 64 - (zen_return_thunk - zen_untrain_ret), 0xcc
 SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
 	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
 	/*
@@ -190,16 +190,16 @@ SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL,
 	 *
 	 *   TEST $0xcc, %bl
 	 *   LFENCE
-	 *   JMP __x86_return_thunk
+	 *   JMP zen_return_thunk
 	 *
 	 * Executing the TEST instruction has a side effect of evicting any BTB
 	 * prediction (potentially attacker controlled) attached to the RET, as
-	 * __x86_return_thunk + 1 isn't an instruction boundary at the moment.
+	 * zen_return_thunk + 1 isn't an instruction boundary at the moment.
 	 */
 	.byte	0xf6
 
 	/*
-	 * As executed from __x86_return_thunk, this is a plain RET.
+	 * As executed from zen_return_thunk, this is a plain RET.
 	 *
 	 * As part of the TEST above, RET is the ModRM byte, and INT3 the imm8.
 	 *
@@ -211,13 +211,13 @@ SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL,
 	 * With SMT enabled and STIBP active, a sibling thread cannot poison
 	 * RET's prediction to a type of its choice, but can evict the
 	 * prediction due to competitive sharing. If the prediction is
-	 * evicted, __x86_return_thunk will suffer Straight Line Speculation
+	 * evicted, zen_return_thunk will suffer Straight Line Speculation
 	 * which will be contained safely by the INT3.
 	 */
-SYM_INNER_LABEL(__x86_return_thunk, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
+SYM_INNER_LABEL(zen_return_thunk, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
 	ret
 	int3
-SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
+SYM_CODE_END(zen_return_thunk)
 
 	/*
 	 * Ensure the TEST decoding / BTB invalidation is complete.
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
 	 * Jump back and execute the RET in the middle of the TEST instruction.
 	 * INT3 is for SLS protection.
 	 */
-	jmp __x86_return_thunk
+	jmp zen_return_thunk
 	int3
 SYM_FUNC_END(zen_untrain_ret)
 __EXPORT_THUNK(zen_untrain_ret)
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(srso_alias_return_thunk)
 	ud2
 SYM_CODE_END(srso_alias_return_thunk)
 
-#else /* CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY */
+#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY */
 
 	.section .text.__x86.return_thunk
 
@@ -299,9 +299,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START(__x86_return_thunk)
 	ret
 	int3
 SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY */
-
 __EXPORT_THUNK(__x86_return_thunk)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_RETHUNK */
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -455,7 +455,12 @@ static int decode_instructions(struct ob
 				return -1;
 			}
 
-			if (func->return_thunk || !strcmp(func->name, "srso_safe_ret") || func->alias != func)
+			/*
+			 * Both zen_return_thunk() and srso_safe_ret() are embedded inside
+			 * another instruction and objtool doesn't grok that. Skip validating them.
+			 */
+			if (!strcmp(func->name, "zen_return_thunk") ||
+			    !strcmp(func->name, "srso_safe_ret") || func->alias != func)
 				continue;
 
 			if (!find_insn(file, sec, func->offset)) {
@@ -1583,7 +1588,7 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
 			 * middle of another instruction.  Objtool only
 			 * knows about the outer instruction.
 			 */
-			if (sym && sym->return_thunk) {
+			if (sym && !strcmp(sym->name, "zen_return_thunk")) {
 				add_return_call(file, insn, false);
 				continue;
 			}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-09  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-09  7:12 [RFC][PATCH 00/17] Fix up the recent SRSO patches Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/17] x86/alternative: Unconditional custom return thunk Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  9:31   ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-10 11:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/17] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 15:45   ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-10 11:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 12:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 12:56       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 13:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-11  7:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-11 17:00         ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-08-12 11:20           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/17] x86/cpu: Make srso_untrain_ret consistent Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 12:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/17] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 12:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 12:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 12:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 15:02         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 15:22           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/17] x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 12:51   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 13:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-12 18:30         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/17] x86/cpu: Add SRSO untrain to retbleed= Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:42   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:28       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 15:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 15:43           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:31     ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-09 14:39       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-10 15:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 16:10     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-11 10:27       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-12 11:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-12 12:12           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 15:45           ` David Laight
2023-08-12 11:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-12 12:10         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 10:56           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/17] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:50   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:30       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 15:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-13 10:36   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 10:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/17] x86/cpu: Add IBPB on VMEXIT to retbleed= Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/17] x86: Remove CONFIG_CPU_SRSO Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:57   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/17] x86: Remove CPU_IBPB_ENTRY Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/17] x86/cpu: Remove all SRSO interface nonsense Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 13:10   ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-09 13:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:05   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09 14:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 15:34   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09  7:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-08-09 14:20   ` [RFC][PATCH 12/17] x86/cpu: Rename original retbleed return thunk Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09 14:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 11:06       ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-10 13:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-13 15:23           ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-14 10:34             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:31               ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-14 12:06                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/17] objtool/x86: Add arch_is_offset_insn() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  9:56   ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-09 14:34   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/17] objtool: Add comments to the arch_is_$foo() magic symbols Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/17] x86/cpu: Rename srso_(.*)_alias to srso_alias_\1 Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/17] x86/alternatives: Simplify ALTERNATIVE_n() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  7:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/17] x86/cpu: Use fancy alternatives to get rid of entry_untrain_ret() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-09  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/17] Fix up the recent SRSO patches Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-09 10:04 ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-09 11:58   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230809072201.259675763@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=David.Kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome