From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/21] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 15:21:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acc7a5c96e8235bf11af640798ce1b60bcaa8196.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be8d4efa-e29a-4463-a7fc-50320aebf1cd@amd.com>
On Wed, 2026-02-18 at 23:16 +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Chenyu,
>
> On 2/18/2026 8:52 PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> > > On a separate note, if we add a dependency on SCHED_MC for SCHED_CACHE,
> > > we can simply look at cpu_coregroup_mask() and either allocate a new
> > > llc_id / borrow llc id in sched_cpu_activate() when CPU is onlined or
> > > reassign them in sched_cpu_deactivate() if an entire LLC is offlined.
> > >
> >
> > Prateek, may I know if you are thinking of updating every CPU's LLC id
> > during its hotplug and not update all percpu LLC id in build_sched_domains()?
>
> I was still thinking of build_sched_domains() (or somewhere in the
> online and offline path) where we can first simply look at
> cpu_coregroup_mask() and decide if we need to traverse all CPUs and
> shuffle the IDs.
Pratek,
How about modifying the patch like the following, stealing
a lot of your code. Also added change to shrink max LLCs when
the LLC with max id lost its last CPU.
Thanks.
Tim
---
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 9848de949afa..4ddf54ab9cf7 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -987,6 +987,7 @@ config SCHED_CACHE
bool "Cache aware load balance"
default y
depends on SMP
+ depends on SCHED_MC
help
When enabled, the scheduler will attempt to aggregate tasks from
the same process onto a single Last Level Cache (LLC) domain when
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 48626c81ba8e..75ba4e0bfcd3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8474,6 +8474,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
*/
synchronize_rcu();
+ sched_domains_free_llc_id(cpu);
+
sched_set_rq_offline(rq, cpu);
scx_rq_deactivate(rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 6cbc56e9adfc..04f42526e6f0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -3862,6 +3862,7 @@ static inline bool sched_cache_enabled(void)
extern void sched_cache_active_set_unlocked(void);
#endif
extern void init_sched_mm(struct task_struct *p);
+void sched_domains_free_llc_id(int cpu);
extern u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
extern int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 580fb2fbc900..5e59340ad9a9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void)
}
/* Protected by sched_domains_mutex: */
+static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask;
static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_tmpmask;
static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_tmpmask2;
static int tl_max_llcs;
@@ -2590,6 +2591,57 @@ static bool topology_span_sane(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
return true;
}
+static int __sched_domains_alloc_llc_id(void)
+{
+ int lid;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sched_domains_mutex);
+
+ lid = cpumask_first_zero(sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask);
+ if (lid >= tl_max_llcs)
+ tl_max_llcs = lid + 1;
+
+ /*
+ * llc_id space should never grow larger than the
+ * possible number of CPUs in the system.
+ */
+ if (!unlikely(WARN_ON_ONCE(lid >= nr_cpumask_bits)))
+ cpumask_set_cpu(lid, sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask);
+ return lid;
+}
+
+static void __sched_domains_free_llc_id(int cpu)
+{
+ int i, lid;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sched_domains_mutex);
+
+ lid = per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu);
+ if (lid == -1)
+ return;
+
+ per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu) = -1;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+ /* An online CPU owns the llc_id. */
+ if (per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) == lid)
+ return;
+ }
+
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(lid, sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask);
+
+ /* shrink max LLC size to save memory */
+ if (lid == tl_max_llcs - 1)
+ lid = tl_max_llcs--;
+}
+
+void sched_domains_free_llc_id(int cpu)
+{
+ sched_domains_mutex_lock();
+ __sched_domains_free_llc_id(cpu);
+ sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
+}
+
/*
* Build sched domains for a given set of CPUs and attach the sched domains
* to the individual CPUs
@@ -2615,18 +2667,11 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
/* Set up domains for CPUs specified by the cpu_map: */
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
- struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, *tl_llc = NULL;
+ struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl;
int lid;
sd = NULL;
for_each_sd_topology(tl) {
- int flags = 0;
-
- if (tl->sd_flags)
- flags = (*tl->sd_flags)();
-
- if (flags & SD_SHARE_LLC)
- tl_llc = tl;
sd = build_sched_domain(tl, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
@@ -2642,18 +2687,19 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
if (lid == -1) {
int j;
+ j = cpumask_first(cpu_coregroup_mask(i));
/*
* Assign the llc_id to the CPUs that do not
* have an LLC.
*/
- if (!tl_llc) {
- per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) = tl_max_llcs++;
+ if (j >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+ per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) = __sched_domains_alloc_llc_id();
continue;
}
/* try to reuse the llc_id of its siblings */
- for_each_cpu(j, tl_llc->mask(tl_llc, i)) {
+ for (; j < nr_cpu_ids; j = cpumask_next(j, cpu_coregroup_mask(i))) {
if (i == j)
continue;
@@ -2668,7 +2714,7 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
/* a new LLC is detected */
if (lid == -1)
- per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) = tl_max_llcs++;
+ per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) = __sched_domains_alloc_llc_id();
}
}
@@ -2869,6 +2915,7 @@ int __init sched_init_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
{
int err;
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask, GFP_KERNEL);
zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask, GFP_KERNEL);
zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask2, GFP_KERNEL);
zalloc_cpumask_var(&fallback_doms, GFP_KERNEL);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 22:18 [PATCH v3 00/21] Cache Aware Scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-14 12:26 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-14 15:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 18:51 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] sched/cache: Record per LLC utilization to guide cache aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2026-02-14 16:12 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-15 12:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 14:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous Tim Chen
2026-02-14 17:53 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-15 14:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 10:05 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 21:20 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-16 7:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-17 6:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 8:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-17 23:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 15:22 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-18 17:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 23:21 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-02-19 6:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-19 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 0:11 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 11:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 16:10 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 18:45 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 21:33 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 15:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 15:22 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 15:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 16:10 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 19:24 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 19:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 19:35 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 18:17 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 19:20 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 21:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 17:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] sched/cache: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2026-02-14 18:36 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-16 6:58 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] sched/cache: Introduce per CPU's tasks LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2026-02-20 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 16:57 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] sched/cache: Calculate the percpu sd task LLC preference Tim Chen
2026-02-20 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 17:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] sched/cache: Count tasks prefering destination LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2026-02-20 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-21 2:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] sched/cache: Check local_group only once in update_sg_lb_stats() Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-17 18:33 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 21:45 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] sched/cache: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2026-02-17 19:00 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 22:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 18:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2026-02-18 9:14 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-18 15:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-02-18 17:54 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-18 21:44 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 2:28 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 14:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 21:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 7:02 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 6:40 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-20 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 9:42 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 21:06 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for multi LLCs NUMA node Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] sched/cache: Allow the user space to turn on and off cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-20 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 18:18 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Display the per LLC occupancy for each process via proc fs Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Add ftrace to track the load balance statistics Tim Chen
2026-02-19 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] Cache Aware Scheduling Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 18:11 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 3:29 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 2:49 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 18:14 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-24 3:02 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 3:25 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-21 2:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-24 3:11 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 19:48 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 21:47 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 3:41 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 3:31 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acc7a5c96e8235bf11af640798ce1b60bcaa8196.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome