From: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/21] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 21:42:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd428d4b-6720-45c0-ba95-3f663fe39899@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7475922f6020abe5d458a136b0c88fe24e823091.1770760558.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
On 11/02/26 03:48, Tim Chen wrote:
> From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
>
> Cache-aware scheduling aggregates threads onto their preferred LLC,
> mainly through load balancing. When the preferred LLC becomes
> saturated, more threads are still placed there, increasing latency.
> A mechanism is needed to limit aggregation so that the preferred LLC
> does not become overloaded.
>
> Introduce helper functions can_migrate_llc() and
> can_migrate_llc_task() to enforce the LLC migration policy:
>
> 1. Aggregate a task to its preferred LLC if both source and
> destination LLCs are not too busy, or if doing so will not
> leave the preferred LLC much more imbalanced than the
> non-preferred one (>20% utilization difference, a little
> higher than imbalance_pct(17%) of the LLC domain as hysteresis).
> 2. Allow moving a task from overloaded preferred LLC to a non
> preferred LLC if this will not cause the non preferred LLC
> to become too imbalanced to cause a later migration back.
> 3. If both LLCs are too busy, let the generic load balance to
> spread the tasks.
>
> Further (hysteresis)action could be taken in the future to prevent tasks
> from being migrated into and out of the preferred LLC frequently (back and
> forth): the threshold for migrating a task out of its preferred LLC should
> be higher than that for migrating it into the LLC.
>
> Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2->v3:
> No change.
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index dfeb107f2cfd..bf5f39a01017 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9689,6 +9689,27 @@ static inline int task_is_ineligible_on_dst_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int dest_
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> +/*
> + * The margin used when comparing LLC utilization with CPU capacity.
> + * It determines the LLC load level where active LLC aggregation is
> + * done.
> + * Derived from fits_capacity().
> + *
> + * (default: ~50%)
> + */
> +#define fits_llc_capacity(util, max) \
> + ((util) * 2 < (max))
> +
> +/*
> + * The margin used when comparing utilization.
> + * is 'util1' noticeably greater than 'util2'
> + * Derived from capacity_greater().
> + * Bias is in perentage.
> + */
> +/* Allows dst util to be bigger than src util by up to bias percent */
> +#define util_greater(util1, util2) \
> + ((util1) * 100 > (util2) * 120)
> +
> /* Called from load balancing paths with rcu_read_lock held */
> static __maybe_unused bool get_llc_stats(int cpu, unsigned long *util,
> unsigned long *cap)
> @@ -9704,6 +9725,138 @@ static __maybe_unused bool get_llc_stats(int cpu, unsigned long *util,
>
> return true;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Decision matrix according to the LLC utilization. To
> + * decide whether we can do task aggregation across LLC.
> + *
> + * By default, 50% is the threshold for treating the LLC
> + * as busy. The reason for choosing 50% is to avoid saturation
> + * of SMT-2, and it is also a safe cutoff for other SMT-n
> + * platforms.
> + *
> + * 20% is the utilization imbalance percentage to decide
> + * if the preferred LLC is busier than the non-preferred LLC.
> + * 20 is a little higher than the LLC domain's imbalance_pct
> + * 17. The hysteresis is used to avoid task bouncing between the
> + * preferred LLC and the non-preferred LLC.
> + *
> + * 1. moving towards the preferred LLC, dst is the preferred
> + * LLC, src is not.
> + *
> + * src \ dst 30% 40% 50% 60%
> + * 30% Y Y Y N
> + * 40% Y Y Y Y
> + * 50% Y Y G G
> + * 60% Y Y G G
> + *
According to this matrix (which I assume shows utilization after migration),
G is expected for src=50% and dst=50%. However, the code performs the "both
busy" check before adjusting src_util and dst_util:
if (!fits_llc_capacity(dst_util, dst_cap) &&
!fits_llc_capacity(src_util, src_cap))
return mig_unrestricted;
src_util = src_util - tsk_util;
dst_util = dst_util + tsk_util;
For example, with a 10% task migrating from src_util=60% to dst_util=40%:
The check evaluates: !fits(40) && !fits(60) = false && true = false
- Doesn't return mig_unrestricted
- After adjustment: src=50%, dst=50%
- Falls through to return mig_llc (Y)
But the matrix indicates 50%/50% should be G, not Y.
Moving this check after the utilization adjustment would make it consistent
with the documented matrix.
Thanks,
Vineeth
> + * 2. moving out of the preferred LLC, src is the preferred
> + * LLC, dst is not:
> + *
> + * src \ dst 30% 40% 50% 60%
> + * 30% N N N N
> + * 40% N N N N
> + * 50% N N G G
> + * 60% Y N G G
> + *
> + * src : src_util
> + * dst : dst_util
> + * Y : Yes, migrate
> + * N : No, do not migrate
> + * G : let the Generic load balance to even the load.
> + *
> + * The intention is that if both LLCs are quite busy, cache aware
> + * load balance should not be performed, and generic load balance
> + * should take effect. However, if one is busy and the other is not,
> + * the preferred LLC capacity(50%) and imbalance criteria(20%) should
> + * be considered to determine whether LLC aggregation should be
> + * performed to bias the load towards the preferred LLC.
> + */
> +
> +/* migration decision, 3 states are orthogonal. */
> +enum llc_mig {
> + mig_forbid = 0, /* N: Don't migrate task, respect LLC preference */
> + mig_llc, /* Y: Do LLC preference based migration */
> + mig_unrestricted /* G: Don't restrict generic load balance migration */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if task can be moved from the source LLC to the
> + * destination LLC without breaking cache aware preferrence.
> + * src_cpu and dst_cpu are arbitrary CPUs within the source
> + * and destination LLCs, respectively.
> + */
> +static enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
> + unsigned long tsk_util,
> + bool to_pref)
> +{
> + unsigned long src_util, dst_util, src_cap, dst_cap;
> +
> + if (!get_llc_stats(src_cpu, &src_util, &src_cap) ||
> + !get_llc_stats(dst_cpu, &dst_util, &dst_cap))
> + return mig_unrestricted;
> +
> + if (!fits_llc_capacity(dst_util, dst_cap) &&
> + !fits_llc_capacity(src_util, src_cap))
> + return mig_unrestricted;
> +
> + src_util = src_util < tsk_util ? 0 : src_util - tsk_util;
> + dst_util = dst_util + tsk_util;
> + if (to_pref) {
> + /*
> + * Don't migrate if we will get preferred LLC too
> + * heavily loaded and if the dest is much busier
> + * than the src, in which case migration will
> + * increase the imbalance too much.
> + */
> + if (!fits_llc_capacity(dst_util, dst_cap) &&
> + util_greater(dst_util, src_util))
> + return mig_forbid;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Don't migrate if we will leave preferred LLC
> + * too idle, or if this migration leads to the
> + * non-preferred LLC falls within sysctl_aggr_imb percent
> + * of preferred LLC, leading to migration again
> + * back to preferred LLC.
> + */
> + if (fits_llc_capacity(src_util, src_cap) ||
> + !util_greater(src_util, dst_util))
> + return mig_forbid;
> + }
> + return mig_llc;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if task p can migrate from source LLC to
> + * destination LLC in terms of cache aware load balance.
> + */
> +static __maybe_unused enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc_task(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
> + struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + bool to_pref;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + mm = p->mm;
> + if (!mm)
> + return mig_unrestricted;
> +
> + cpu = mm->sc_stat.cpu;
> + if (cpu < 0 || cpus_share_cache(src_cpu, dst_cpu))
> + return mig_unrestricted;
> +
> + if (cpus_share_cache(dst_cpu, cpu))
> + to_pref = true;
> + else if (cpus_share_cache(src_cpu, cpu))
> + to_pref = false;
> + else
> + return mig_unrestricted;
> +
> + return can_migrate_llc(src_cpu, dst_cpu,
> + task_util(p), to_pref);
> +}
> +
> #else
> static inline bool get_llc_stats(int cpu, unsigned long *util,
> unsigned long *cap)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-14 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 22:18 [PATCH v3 00/21] Cache Aware Scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-14 12:26 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-14 15:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 18:51 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] sched/cache: Record per LLC utilization to guide cache aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2026-02-14 16:12 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy [this message]
2026-02-15 12:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 14:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous Tim Chen
2026-02-14 17:53 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-15 14:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 10:05 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 21:20 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-16 7:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-17 6:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 8:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-17 23:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 15:22 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-18 17:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 23:21 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 6:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-19 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 0:11 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 11:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 16:10 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 18:45 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 21:33 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 15:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 15:22 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 15:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 16:10 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 19:24 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 19:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 19:35 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 18:17 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 19:20 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 21:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 17:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] sched/cache: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2026-02-14 18:36 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-16 6:58 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] sched/cache: Introduce per CPU's tasks LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2026-02-20 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 16:57 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] sched/cache: Calculate the percpu sd task LLC preference Tim Chen
2026-02-20 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 17:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] sched/cache: Count tasks prefering destination LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2026-02-20 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-21 2:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] sched/cache: Check local_group only once in update_sg_lb_stats() Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-17 18:33 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 21:45 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] sched/cache: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2026-02-17 19:00 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 22:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 18:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2026-02-18 9:14 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-18 15:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-02-18 17:54 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-18 21:44 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 2:28 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 14:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 21:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 7:02 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 6:40 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-20 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 9:42 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 21:06 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for multi LLCs NUMA node Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] sched/cache: Allow the user space to turn on and off cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-20 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 18:18 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Display the per LLC occupancy for each process via proc fs Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Add ftrace to track the load balance statistics Tim Chen
2026-02-19 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] Cache Aware Scheduling Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 18:11 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 3:29 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 2:49 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 18:14 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-24 3:02 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 3:25 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-21 2:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-24 3:11 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 19:48 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 21:47 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 3:41 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 3:31 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd428d4b-6720-45c0-ba95-3f663fe39899@linux.ibm.com \
--to=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome