From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/21] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 16:11:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3f1bb12c24785ab28ab897a9368a5a2b017bd08.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3de1e4ff-2da5-4a58-a4ea-03accf4b7572@amd.com>
On Thu, 2026-02-19 at 11:42 +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On 2/19/2026 4:51 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
> > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > index 9848de949afa..4ddf54ab9cf7 100644
> > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > @@ -987,6 +987,7 @@ config SCHED_CACHE
> > bool "Cache aware load balance"
> > default y
> > depends on SMP
> > + depends on SCHED_MC
> > help
> > When enabled, the scheduler will attempt to aggregate tasks from
> > the same process onto a single Last Level Cache (LLC) domain when
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 48626c81ba8e..75ba4e0bfcd3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -8474,6 +8474,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
> > */
> > synchronize_rcu();
> >
> > + sched_domains_free_llc_id(cpu);
> > +
> > sched_set_rq_offline(rq, cpu);
> >
> > scx_rq_deactivate(rq);
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > index 6cbc56e9adfc..04f42526e6f0 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > @@ -3862,6 +3862,7 @@ static inline bool sched_cache_enabled(void)
> > extern void sched_cache_active_set_unlocked(void);
> > #endif
> > extern void init_sched_mm(struct task_struct *p);
> > +void sched_domains_free_llc_id(int cpu);
> >
> > extern u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
> > extern int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se);
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > index 580fb2fbc900..5e59340ad9a9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void)
> > }
> >
> > /* Protected by sched_domains_mutex: */
> > +static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask;
> > static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_tmpmask;
> > static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_tmpmask2;
> > static int tl_max_llcs;
> > @@ -2590,6 +2591,57 @@ static bool topology_span_sane(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static int __sched_domains_alloc_llc_id(void)
> > +{
> > + int lid;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&sched_domains_mutex);
> > +
> > + lid = cpumask_first_zero(sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask);
> > + if (lid >= tl_max_llcs)
> > + tl_max_llcs = lid + 1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * llc_id space should never grow larger than the
> > + * possible number of CPUs in the system.
> > + */
> > + if (!unlikely(WARN_ON_ONCE(lid >= nr_cpumask_bits)))
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(lid, sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask);
> > + return lid;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __sched_domains_free_llc_id(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i, lid;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&sched_domains_mutex);
> > +
> > + lid = per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu);
> > + if (lid == -1)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu) = -1;
> > +
> > + for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> > + /* An online CPU owns the llc_id. */
> > + if (per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) == lid)
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> We should perhaps warn and skip clearing lid from cpumask if lid was
> found to be larger than "nr_cpumask_bits". Shouldn't happen but just
> as a precaution.
Will do
>
> > +
> > + cpumask_clear_cpu(lid, sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask);
> > +
> > + /* shrink max LLC size to save memory */
> > + if (lid == tl_max_llcs - 1)
> > + lid = tl_max_llcs--;
>
> No need to assign the local "lid" variable here; Simple decrement
> should do.
Good point
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +void sched_domains_free_llc_id(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + sched_domains_mutex_lock();
> > + __sched_domains_free_llc_id(cpu);
> > + sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Build sched domains for a given set of CPUs and attach the sched domains
> > * to the individual CPUs
> > @@ -2615,18 +2667,11 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
> >
> > /* Set up domains for CPUs specified by the cpu_map: */
> > for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> > - struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, *tl_llc = NULL;
> > + struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl;
> > int lid;
> >
> > sd = NULL;
> > for_each_sd_topology(tl) {
> > - int flags = 0;
> > -
> > - if (tl->sd_flags)
> > - flags = (*tl->sd_flags)();
> > -
> > - if (flags & SD_SHARE_LLC)
> > - tl_llc = tl;
> >
> > sd = build_sched_domain(tl, cpu_map, attr, sd, i);
> >
> > @@ -2642,18 +2687,19 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
> > if (lid == -1) {
> > int j;
> >
> > + j = cpumask_first(cpu_coregroup_mask(i));
> > /*
> > * Assign the llc_id to the CPUs that do not
> > * have an LLC.
> > */
> > - if (!tl_llc) {
> > - per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) = tl_max_llcs++;
> > + if (j >= nr_cpu_ids) {
> > + per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) = __sched_domains_alloc_llc_id();
> >
> > continue;
> > }
>
> I don't think we need to special case this out since:
>
> for_each_cpu(j, cpu_coregroup_mask(i)) {
> ...
> }
>
> would bail out if no CPU is set (also CPU "i" would definitely be
> set on it since it must be online) and the "if" after the loop will
> see "lid" as "-1" and DTRT.
That's right. Will take out the non-needed code.
Also found out that cpu_coregroup_mask() is not defined for config
without CONFIG_SMP. So will put the llc id assignment code under
CONFIG_SMP.
Thanks for the code reviews and suggestions.
Tim
>
> >
> > /* try to reuse the llc_id of its siblings */
> > - for_each_cpu(j, tl_llc->mask(tl_llc, i)) {
> > + for (; j < nr_cpu_ids; j = cpumask_next(j, cpu_coregroup_mask(i))) {
> > if (i == j)
> > continue;
> >
> > @@ -2668,7 +2714,7 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
> >
> > /* a new LLC is detected */
> > if (lid == -1)
> > - per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) = tl_max_llcs++;
> > + per_cpu(sd_llc_id, i) = __sched_domains_alloc_llc_id();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2869,6 +2915,7 @@ int __init sched_init_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
> > {
> > int err;
> >
> > + zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_llc_id_allocmask, GFP_KERNEL);
> > zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask, GFP_KERNEL);
> > zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask2, GFP_KERNEL);
> > zalloc_cpumask_var(&fallback_doms, GFP_KERNEL);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-20 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 22:18 [PATCH v3 00/21] Cache Aware Scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-14 12:26 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-14 15:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 18:51 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] sched/cache: Record per LLC utilization to guide cache aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2026-02-14 16:12 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-15 12:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 14:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous Tim Chen
2026-02-14 17:53 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-15 14:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 10:05 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 21:20 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-16 7:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-17 6:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 8:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-17 23:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 15:22 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-18 17:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 23:21 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 6:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-19 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 0:11 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-02-19 11:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 16:10 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 18:45 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 21:33 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 15:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 15:22 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 15:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 16:10 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 19:24 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 19:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 19:35 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 18:17 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 19:20 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 21:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 17:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] sched/cache: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2026-02-14 18:36 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-16 6:58 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] sched/cache: Introduce per CPU's tasks LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2026-02-20 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 16:57 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] sched/cache: Calculate the percpu sd task LLC preference Tim Chen
2026-02-20 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 17:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] sched/cache: Count tasks prefering destination LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2026-02-20 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-21 2:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] sched/cache: Check local_group only once in update_sg_lb_stats() Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-17 18:33 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 21:45 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] sched/cache: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2026-02-17 19:00 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 22:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 18:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2026-02-18 9:14 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-18 15:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-02-18 17:54 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-18 21:44 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 2:28 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 14:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 21:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 7:02 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 6:40 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-20 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 9:42 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 21:06 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for multi LLCs NUMA node Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] sched/cache: Allow the user space to turn on and off cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-20 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 18:18 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Display the per LLC occupancy for each process via proc fs Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Add ftrace to track the load balance statistics Tim Chen
2026-02-19 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] Cache Aware Scheduling Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 18:11 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 3:29 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 2:49 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 18:14 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-24 3:02 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 3:25 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-21 2:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-24 3:11 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 19:48 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 21:47 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 3:41 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 3:31 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3f1bb12c24785ab28ab897a9368a5a2b017bd08.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox