From: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/21] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 14:44:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be3c2d70-d589-43d0-8eb5-e4b02c3ee4d8@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82aeb78bbfb80cb6861b85e4db9d398f6c8e331b.1770760558.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
On 11/02/26 03:48, Tim Chen wrote:
> During the final step of load balancing, can_migrate_task() now
> considers a task's LLC preference before moving it out of its
> preferred LLC.
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Co-developed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2->v3:
> Use the similar mechanism as NUMA balancing, which skips over
> the tasks that would degrade locality in can_migrate_task();
> and only if nr_balanced_failed is high enough do we ignore that.
> (Peter Zijlstra)
>
> Let migrate_degrade_locality() take precedence over
> migrate_degrades_llc(), which aims to migrate towards the preferred
> NUMA node. (Peter Zijlstra)
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 13 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 03959a701514..d1145997b88d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9973,8 +9973,8 @@ static enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
> * Check if task p can migrate from source LLC to
> * destination LLC in terms of cache aware load balance.
> */
> -static __maybe_unused enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc_task(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
> - struct task_struct *p)
> +static enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc_task(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
> + struct task_struct *p)
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> bool to_pref;
> @@ -10041,6 +10041,47 @@ alb_break_llc(struct lb_env *env)
>
> return false;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if migrating task p from env->src_cpu to
> + * env->dst_cpu breaks LLC localiy.
> + */
> +static bool migrate_degrades_llc(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
> +{
> + if (!sched_cache_enabled())
> + return false;
> +
> + if (task_has_sched_core(p))
> + return false;
> + /*
> + * Skip over tasks that would degrade LLC locality;
> + * only when nr_balanced_failed is sufficiently high do we
> + * ignore this constraint.
> + *
> + * Threshold of cache_nice_tries is set to 1 higher
> + * than nr_balance_failed to avoid excessive task
> + * migration at the same time. Refer to comments around
> + * llc_balance().
> + */
> + if (env->sd->nr_balance_failed >= env->sd->cache_nice_tries + 1)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * We know the env->src_cpu has some tasks prefer to
> + * run on env->dst_cpu, skip the tasks do not prefer
> + * env->dst_cpu, and find the one that prefers.
> + */
> + if (env->migration_type == migrate_llc_task &&
> + task_llc(p) != llc_id(env->dst_cpu))
> + return true;
`task_llc(p)` returns the LLC id of the CPU the task is currently running on, right?
Wouldn’t we need to check the task’s *preferred* LLC instead?
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Vineeth
> +
> + if (can_migrate_llc_task(env->src_cpu,
> + env->dst_cpu, p) != mig_forbid)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> #else
> static inline bool get_llc_stats(int cpu, unsigned long *util,
> unsigned long *cap)
> @@ -10053,6 +10094,12 @@ alb_break_llc(struct lb_env *env)
> {
> return false;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool
> +migrate_degrades_llc(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif
> /*
> * can_migrate_task - may task p from runqueue rq be migrated to this_cpu?
> @@ -10150,10 +10197,19 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
> return 1;
>
> degrades = migrate_degrades_locality(p, env);
> - if (!degrades)
> + if (!degrades) {
> + /*
> + * If the NUMA locality is not broken,
> + * further check if migration would hurt
> + * LLC locality.
> + */
> + if (migrate_degrades_llc(p, env))
> + return 0;
> +
> hot = task_hot(p, env);
> - else
> + } else {
> hot = degrades > 0;
> + }
>
> if (!hot || env->sd->nr_balance_failed > env->sd->cache_nice_tries) {
> if (hot)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index ac8c7ac1ac0d..c18e59f320a6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1495,6 +1495,14 @@ extern void sched_core_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
> extern void sched_core_get(void);
> extern void sched_core_put(void);
>
> +static inline bool task_has_sched_core(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + if (sched_core_disabled())
> + return false;
> +
> + return !!p->core_cookie;
> +}
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE: */
>
> static inline bool sched_core_enabled(struct rq *rq)
> @@ -1534,6 +1542,11 @@ static inline bool sched_group_cookie_match(struct rq *rq,
> return true;
> }
>
> +static inline bool task_has_sched_core(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 22:18 [PATCH v3 00/21] Cache Aware Scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-14 12:26 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-14 15:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 18:51 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] sched/cache: Record per LLC utilization to guide cache aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2026-02-14 16:12 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-15 12:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 14:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous Tim Chen
2026-02-14 17:53 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-15 14:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 10:05 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 21:20 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-16 7:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-17 6:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-17 8:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-17 23:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 15:22 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-18 17:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 23:21 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 6:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-19 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 0:11 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 11:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 16:10 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-02-18 18:45 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 21:33 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-18 15:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 15:22 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 15:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 16:10 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 19:24 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 19:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 19:35 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 18:17 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 19:20 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 21:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 17:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] sched/cache: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2026-02-14 18:36 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-16 6:58 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] sched/cache: Introduce per CPU's tasks LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2026-02-20 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 16:57 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-20 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] sched/cache: Calculate the percpu sd task LLC preference Tim Chen
2026-02-20 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 17:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] sched/cache: Count tasks prefering destination LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2026-02-20 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-21 2:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] sched/cache: Check local_group only once in update_sg_lb_stats() Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-17 18:33 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 21:45 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] sched/cache: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2026-02-17 19:00 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-17 22:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 18:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2026-02-18 9:14 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy [this message]
2026-02-18 15:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-02-18 17:54 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-18 21:44 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 2:28 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 14:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 21:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-19 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 7:02 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 6:40 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-20 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 9:42 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2026-02-19 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 21:06 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for multi LLCs NUMA node Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] sched/cache: Allow the user space to turn on and off cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-02-20 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-20 18:18 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Display the per LLC occupancy for each process via proc fs Tim Chen
2026-02-10 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Add ftrace to track the load balance statistics Tim Chen
2026-02-19 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] Cache Aware Scheduling Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-19 15:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-19 18:11 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 3:29 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 2:49 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 18:14 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-24 3:02 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 3:25 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-21 2:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-02-24 3:11 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 19:48 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-19 21:47 ` Tim Chen
2026-02-20 3:41 ` Qais Yousef
2026-02-20 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 3:31 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be3c2d70-d589-43d0-8eb5-e4b02c3ee4d8@linux.ibm.com \
--to=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox